Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 57
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,839
    Quote Originally Posted by MegaStoke View Post
    This makes me sad. Those were my favorite skis for hauling ass on shitty low tide conditions. Any similar replacements to look at?
    New Dynastar M-Pro 105, 99, 90.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    I'd blame pro skiers who have found they don't need huge heavy skis to do most of their skiing, thanks to new design and tech. And we are the goofballs to them.
    We'd second this...with a solid shape and a full-length wood core, it's really difficult to see how a heavier ski would blast through crud better.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by MegaStoke View Post
    This makes me sad. Those were my favorite skis for hauling ass on shitty low tide conditions. Any similar replacements to look at?
    Woah...bummer...the Head Monster 88 has been by every day go to out east for a few years now. Love that ski.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,901
    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Nobody else wants fucking cutting boards on their skis. Jesus Christ.
    Resistance is futile. It's a bigger picture, long game thing. U don't need eyes to see, you need vision. Cutting board tail and tip xtendrz are the first steps to the eventual target. A ski fully modifiable to suit preferences and snow conditions of the day with re and re able differently shaped and preferred length tip and tail component pieces. A Lego ski, if u will. 10 year target to turn the ski manufacturing industry on its head.



    In other news; for a true heavy old school kinda skinny ski that dominates everything crud related, still can't beat the good old circa year 2000ish Volant Ti Chubb 190's. The love affair continues to this day. They get the nod on cruddy hill days and for spring refreeze supportive and/or breakable crust and corn on April heli ski days. Heavy metal rocks on.
    Name:  download.jpg
Views: 1483
Size:  5.0 KB
    Last edited by swissiphic; 03-04-2020 at 10:44 AM.
    Master of mediocrity.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    I'd blame pro skiers who have found they don't need huge heavy skis to do most of their skiing, thanks to getting paid to chase powder. And we are the goofballs to them.
    FIFY

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,481
    Seriously, Wren 108ti.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14

    Blizzard Bodacious

    The Blizzard bodacious quite a heavy charging ski. But is sad to see skis like the Faction 13 and hte Original Dynastar legends disappear. Less straight line skis are available to buy.
    I have a pair of the Arne Backstrom Edition of the Blizzard bodacious skis for sale. New in Plastic 186cm length for $500

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    FIFY
    When have they not been paid to chase powder?

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    THOR-Foothills
    Posts
    5,994
    The AB Bodacious is the ski you’re looking for. It’s a lot easier to ski than you think.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0887.JPG 
Views:	247 
Size:	266.4 KB 
ID:	319609

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0888.JPG 
Views:	264 
Size:	535.1 KB 
ID:	319610


    Sent from inside the house
    It doesn't matter if you're a king or a little street sweeper...
    ...sooner or later you'll dance with the reaper
    -Death

    Quote Originally Posted by St. Jerry View Post
    The other morning I was awoken to "Daddy, my fart fell on the floor"
    Kaz is my co-pilot

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    People's Republic of MN
    Posts
    5,761
    What's the story on the Rossi Black Ops? Heavy? Does Volkl offer anything these days? The Mantra of old was a TANK. Atomic had some heavyweights too. Is this in part that there are so many "boutique" makers in the powder-chaser space, and that they are great skis with lotsa buzz, but a lot of those smaller makers don't have the technical capability to make metal chargers?
    Gravity. It's the law.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,370
    I have a pair of 192 bro blems that are a lot of ski.
    kinda swiss cheesy
    Drivers @335
    Pivots at 335ish (I think) and 1/2 a mount (a heel mismount at ginourmous bsl sasquatch)

    I’ve only been using these occasionally to coach myself when my technique is getting sloppy.
    Would rather have skins for my 185 qst118s, or money for skins.
    Lemme know.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    360
    I had (still have!) those Line Influences and moved last year to the Nordica Enforcer. I felt right at home.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    DownEast
    Posts
    3,265
    Quote Originally Posted by axebiker View Post
    What's the story on the Rossi Black Ops? Heavy? Does Volkl offer anything these days? The Mantra of old was a TANK. Atomic had some heavyweights too. Is this in part that there are so many "boutique" makers in the powder-chaser space, and that they are great skis with lotsa buzz, but a lot of those smaller makers don't have the technical capability to make metal chargers?
    The Volkl Mantra 102 has been delivering for me of late.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    3,081
    Quote Originally Posted by axebiker View Post
    What's the story on the Rossi Black Ops? Heavy? Does Volkl offer anything these days? The Mantra of old was a TANK. Atomic had some heavyweights too. Is this in part that there are so many "boutique" makers in the powder-chaser space, and that they are great skis with lotsa buzz, but a lot of those smaller makers don't have the technical capability to make metal chargers?
    Black Ops 118 is about 2450g at 184cm, among the heaviest in its class.

    There are options from smaller brands, but I do think it’s more of a challenge for them to work with laminates and whatnot at a smaller production level. More often you can customize core woods to achieve heavier/more damp options from them.

    Boutique growth also paralleled with the marketization of touring and their push for lighter gear over the last decade. I think that helped skew offerings that direction.

    Folsom, Praxis, Parlor, Fatypus, have been known for burliest builds, along with post-boutiques ON3P, Moment, and the $$$ Igneous, Bomber types


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy View Post
    I have a pair of 192 bro blems that are a lot of ski.
    kinda swiss cheesy
    Drivers @335
    Pivots at 335ish (I think) and 1/2 a mount (a heel mismount at ginourmous bsl sasquatch)

    I’ve only been using these occasionally to coach myself when my technique is getting sloppy.
    Would rather have skins for my 185 qst118s, or money for skins.
    Lemme know.
    So there's your answer. Where did they go? They're right here and nobody wants them. That's why nobody is making new ones.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down on Electric Avenue
    Posts
    4,447
    I likes the heavyweights. I'm 5'9" and move between 195-215 lbs. depending.
    And skiing JH allows for a lotta room to roll them.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	heavy.jpg 
Views:	229 
Size:	1,015.7 KB 
ID:	319709

    So heavy they gotta lay sideways.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    J Skis the metal is heavy. 2350g for the 186. It is not burly tho.


  18. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    35
    Got the Black Ops 118 in mail! Can't wait to steamroll through everything.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    People's Republic of MN
    Posts
    5,761
    Just thought about another - the older Liberty Variant. While I haven’t been on their new V series skis, they are racking up the accolades, and now they have the one that is a cross between the Origin and the V series - 90 & 100 waist with a new width in the works for next season.
    Gravity. It's the law.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    388
    Can't believe I didn't think of this sooner...my Kastle FX104...took the dynafits off (it's just been sitting around since I got my new touring setup..black crowes)...threw a pair of extra pivots on there...boom! How you like that for a traditional mount point!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	the skis.jpg 
Views:	144 
Size:	1.15 MB 
ID:	319886

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy View Post
    So there's your answer. Where did they go? They're right here and nobody wants them. That's why nobody is making new ones.
    So true...

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    277
    My wife and I both have the first generation Cochise. Same construction as the first Bodacious but 108 under foot. Two sheets of metal, 28 m radius, limited rise and no camber. The skis are chargers but pivot and slarve easily.Earlier this week I was skiing 6 to 10 inches of windsift over grabby old snow and they just rip through with no deflection. Blizzard had to make it more 'accessible' (easier) so they lightened it and put in camber. Still a strong ski but not the same.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    939
    Quote Originally Posted by apex dave View Post
    My wife and I both have the first generation Cochise. Same construction as the first Bodacious but 108 under foot. Two sheets of metal, 28 m radius, limited rise and no camber. The skis are chargers but pivot and slarve easily.Earlier this week I was skiing 6 to 10 inches of windsift over grabby old snow and they just rip through with no deflection. Blizzard had to make it more 'accessible' (easier) so they lightened it and put in camber. Still a strong ski but not the same.
    The second generation Cochise was heavier than the first... Actually the very first year was the lightest they ever were. They got heavier and heavier over the years.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    I’ve been skiing the Rustler 9 for the past two weeks, and yesterday got out my MX98s. Took me a run or two to get used to the weight on my feet, but driving then came right back. Felt like a pair of comfy old shoes.

    Heavy and light skis have their place. I’m really enjoying both.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Caucasian Asian View Post
    The AB Bodacious is the ski you’re looking for. It’s a lot easier to ski than you think.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0887.JPG 
Views:	247 
Size:	266.4 KB 
ID:	319609

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0888.JPG 
Views:	264 
Size:	535.1 KB 
ID:	319610


    Sent from inside the house
    What length are you skiing? 196cm is too much ski for me at the resort with moguls, and the actual length of the 186 seems slightly short

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •