Page 23 of 26 FirstFirst ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LastLast
Results 551 to 575 of 634
  1. #551
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Curious what length you are on for both skis?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    184 Katana and 181 QST. I hesitated with the 181 thinking no way, too short, but it feels right.

  2. #552
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Quote Originally Posted by Beder View Post
    I hesitated with the 181 thinking no way, too short, but it feels right.
    Ha, exactly. I may have to try some, I’m curious now.

  3. #553
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,178
    Can anyone compare K108 and MPro 105? Have been enjoying my Katana but snagged a pair of new MP105 and now have some remorse to mount them if no one buys it.

    Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

  4. #554
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    668
    You should enjoy having both. You would grab the LP105 less but when you skied it it would put a huge smile on your face. Once you nail the tune to your spec to offset the camber, you can't beat that build and shape IMO

    Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

  5. #555
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    554
    Well if I had a pair of K108's, I would definitely mount on the rec line. I just did a remount to my M102's back to the rec line after being about 12mm forward of rec. That was the way to go for me. Maybe my reason for liking the back line is that I am a bigfoot in a 28.5 boot. Pretty sure both Bandit and Shorty J have small feet which could explain why they like +1.

  6. #556
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,691
    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Pabst View Post
    Well if I had a pair of K108's, I would definitely mount on the rec line. I just did a remount to my M102's back to the rec line after being about 12mm forward of rec. That was the way to go for me. Maybe my reason for liking the back line is that I am a bigfoot in a 28.5 boot. Pretty sure both Bandit and Shorty J have small feet which could explain why they like +1.
    You are 100% right about me, but I think Bandit is on the line.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  7. #557
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #558
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    5,867
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??
    Definitely not the skill of the rider.

    I think you’re mounted forward on a flat camber ski that likes to wander anyways. You lean back and widen your stance and there you go. But without watching it who knows.

    I got rid of mine because at speed in variable snow I had to spend too much time minding the tips.
    focus.

  9. #559
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,189

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    You are 100% right about me, but I think Bandit is on the line.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    295-mm BSL and I’m on the rear line. Couldn’t imagine needing to go forward (for my style), but I also have 200-lbs working for me with this ski.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  10. #560
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,189
    Just spent Friday up at Blackcomb on my 184’s. OMG…I almost forgot how much I enjoy these on a Big mountain with Big terrain. Spent lots of time well north of 50-mph on soft groomers. I love how easy they are to back off the edges, slide the tails around, and shut down speed. Then, jump off trail in the 6-8” of Pow and wind-affected crud and they float and push through everything. With the 3D sidecut, they are like a fat race ski, with just enough give in that tail to feel forgiving in crappy snow.

    I think I need a backup pair of 184’s.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  11. #561
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    Definitely not the skill of the rider.
    Heh, my skill is def in question.

    But seriously, cant tell if you’re being snarky and saying it’s me (it’s likely me, I just don’t know why), or you’re saying that you had some similar drama with them?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  12. #562
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Also, I am mounted forward, but would 1.5 cm cause that problem? If I don’t click with these I likely won’t risk the value loss in a remount to find out, I think I’ll move on.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

  13. #563
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,189
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    If you can ski the OG Cochise and Vwerks, you’re no slouch. So, I’m going with stance/style or tune. Both the OG Cochise and Vwerks have a much larger, single radius sidecut, which may also be a factor. Also, if you are a skis close together kind of skier, those fat tips and 3D sidecut can work against you.

    I cannot quite put my finger on it, but after spending so much time on my 184 M102/K108 (and perhaps adjusting my technique to suit those skis), I have really fallen out of love with my 185 OG Cochise. Like in a “what did I ever like about these?” kind of way.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  14. #564
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    5,867

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Little snark… old TGR habits die hard.

    But also, I found them to be twitchy and you had to think about both skis to keep them in line at speed on any snow that wasn’t smooth. For me, this meant thinking about how much rotational force I was applying to each ski, especially when they were flat or in variable conditions.

    Forward mount exacerbated this. If your skill/experience level isn’t up to it or you have bad habits, that will be magnified too. I bet they’re great at low speeds on groomers or in 6” of fresh snow. I bet longer sidecut skis you leave the outside ski behind frequently, but with the weird 3d+ tight sidecut you see the opposite with these.
    focus.

  15. #565
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    . I bet longer sidecut skis you leave the outside ski behind frequently, but with the weird 3d+ tight sidecut you see the opposite with these.
    Ah, now were getting somewhere. Leaving the outside ski behind is something that I have had to focus on not doing with other skis in the past, but it seemed like I could overcome it/get past it.

    I’m sure I have loads of bad habits engrained at this point but I’ve never really had a ski that I thought much about after a handful of runs on it.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #566
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    342
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    I'm 160 lbs, and the skis are 177, mounted on the most forward if the three lines. My last skis were 184 metal katanas 112. I felt today that if i load the tips like on the 112s, the tips were diving. Any comments?
    Likely not the answer you're looking for, but based on your previous ski, I bet you'd be happier on the 184. Tip dive isn't something I've personally experienced on these.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Just spent Friday up at Blackcomb on my 184’s. OMG…I almost forgot how much I enjoy these on a Big mountain with Big terrain. Spent lots of time well north of 50-mph on soft groomers. I love how easy they are to back off the edges, slide the tails around, and shut down speed. Then, jump off trail in the 6-8” of Pow and wind-affected crud and they float and push through everything. With the 3D sidecut, they are like a fat race ski, with just enough give in that tail to feel forgiving in crappy snow.
    Yah, ^ this all sounds right; they're a pretty unreal Blackcomb DD for traditional folks like us. I have 50 some days on my pair and have hardly grabbed anything else this year.

    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    I skied mine for the first time. I’m 5’11”, 165 pounds mounted at +1.5 on the 184. They skied great on groomers and anywhere without moguls that I could let them run but I’m not sure they are the daily driver I’m looking for. In moguls, I found them to be a handful.
    The other area that I had some trouble was in steep, tight trees with lightly tracked to untracked, settled snow of about 12 inches. They felt a little too locked into turns for this condition. Like I would commit to a turn but then see the spacing in the trees differently and it didn’t feel like I could easily release and change the turn shape, which would put me off of my preferred line.
    Sorry you're not getting along with em. As Bandit said above though, none of this ^ is super surprising. They definitely fall into the metal lam charger camp with similar characteristics to that class, the rocker profile and sidecut just make em more accessible IME. Great DD for a place like Blackcomb (mostly open spaces), and while I like em in steeps (I just like steeps), in 2 and 3D, I also generally ski a turn or two ahead and try not to stop in sketchy places, which lines up well with the K108s attributes (min speed but no max kinda ski). And if I'm skiing moguls, I fucked up. Hope you find the unicorn you're looking for! 6'2/195#, on the 191 at plus 1.

  17. #567
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,691
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Not trying to be snarky when I ask if you have a true bar? Edge high could cause this but that can't be diagnosed over the internet.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  18. #568
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,667
    Btw, on my k108, I've been crossing tips too. I'm going to check the tune, did are 3 days from new

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  19. #569
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    Not trying to be snarky when I ask if you have a true bar? Edge high could cause this but that can't be diagnosed over the internet.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    I do not, but I could probably have a shop check? If this were the case and it was a tune problem, wouldn’t it show up on groomers as well? As far as I know, this has only happened off trail, which leads me to believe its my (lack of) technique not clicking with the ski.

    Edit: looks like Rod has had this happen too?

  20. #570
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,880
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Powerful traditional skis are particularly sensitive to the tune. A good friend was just complaining about her M102s being “hooky” and demanding, but a basic hand tune (2 degree side, 1 degree base, and light gummy 12” back from the tip and tail) and she’s loving them. I wouldn’t expect Volkls to be railed, but worth checking.

  21. #571
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    55
    I got a few days on my new (to me) K108's 184's that I got off another member here. The first few runs I tried them I took them right off and went back to my M102's. The tips were everywhere when trying to get them on edge and go through bumpy stuff on the groomers and in the trees. Thought these weren't going to be my skis.

    The group I was staying with in SLC had a set of these same skis and feeling the edges back to back, these were like a razor blade compared to the others that had a bunch of days on them (which the owner was getting along with). A round of de-tuning from the local shop, and they were still quite a bit sharper than the other guys skis, but MUCH improved on the slope. I could actually move these things around and get the tails to release when I needed them to. These things are rippers now.

  22. #572
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,667
    I had to detune the tips on mine. I was crossing the tips, which i can't remember the last time this happened with all my other skis.

    Fixed the problem

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  23. #573
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,158
    Quote Originally Posted by GHILL28 View Post
    I got a few days on my new (to me) K108's 184's that I got off another member here. The first few runs I tried them I took them right off and went back to my M102's. The tips were everywhere when trying to get them on edge and go through bumpy stuff on the groomers and in the trees. Thought these weren't going to be my skis.

    The group I was staying with in SLC had a set of these same skis and feeling the edges back to back, these were like a razor blade compared to the others that had a bunch of days on them (which the owner was getting along with). A round of de-tuning from the local shop, and they were still quite a bit sharper than the other guys skis, but MUCH improved on the slope. I could actually move these things around and get the tails to release when I needed them to. These things are rippers now.
    Ha,I guess I should’ve (de)tuned them before deciding they weren’t for me? Glad they are working for you now.

  24. #574
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    If you can ski the OG Cochise and Vwerks, you’re no slouch. So, I’m going with stance/style or tune. Both the OG Cochise and Vwerks have a much larger, single radius sidecut, which may also be a factor. Also, if you are a skis close together kind of skier, those fat tips and 3D sidecut can work against you.

    I cannot quite put my finger on it, but after spending so much time on my 184 M102/K108 (and perhaps adjusting my technique to suit those skis), I have really fallen out of love with my 185 OG Cochise. Like in a “what did I ever like about these?” kind of way.
    Bandit man - where do you have yours mounted. I love my 102s so much thinking about picking these up (184 as well) but would probably want to mount a cm or two forward.

  25. #575
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,667
    I initially mounted my 177 k108s on the more forward line and the tips were diving too much in powder, so i remounted on the back line, recommended, and problem solved

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •