Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 33 of 33
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,488
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    Insulated ski pants are bulkier, they are heavier, they are usually not as well made, they are usually not as well designed, they are good for skiing only, i'm betting you can't take them off without 1st taking off your ski boots

    seperate shell with full side zips + insulation are not that ^^
    Other than needing to take them off and on over your boots for some reason, they are not really the rest of what you said. Maybe years and years ago, but like anything else, there are differences at different price points.
    I also don't see how I'm saving bulk if I have to wear fleece sweats under my pants.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,089
    well there is a page of people who disagree with you and buy shell pants

    So are you a Ditrani or a Bogner kind of skier?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,274
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    Insulated ski pants are bulkier, they are heavier, they are usually not as well made, they are usually not as well designed, they are good for skiing only, i'm betting you can't take them off without 1st taking off your ski boots

    seperate shell with full side zips + insulation are not that ^^
    And they make you look fat.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,089
    a ski bud told the wife he thot the washing machine was fucking up his jeans cuz they weren't fitting so well, she told him the washing machine was not the appliance making his jeans fit poorly ... it was the refrigerator

    SO, its probably not the pants making skiers look fat ... its usually a fork
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by swissiphic View Post
    What's the weight of these?
    14oz-ish for the Medium-Short/Regular size. I'm 6' 190#. Packs down to small melon size. Full side buttons for removal w/ boots.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,593
    Quote Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark View Post
    I have a set of those, use them for snow biking and back up ski kit. Not bad for the price.
    watch out for snakes

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Lahar View Post
    14oz-ish for the Medium-Short/Regular size. I'm 6' 190#. Packs down to small melon size. Full side buttons for removal w/ boots.
    Pretty light. Price at the canuck amazon including shipping: $46.29 CAD.
    Master of mediocrity.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    407

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •