Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
12-16-2019, 11:17 PM #1
Sickle 186cm Recommended Mount Point
Anyone happen to remember what the recommended mount point was on the old 186 Sickles?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-17-2019, 06:02 AM #2
IIRC, there’s a mfr mark on the skis - I mounted mine there (boot sole center) and they were good.
The old Blister reviewer (Ellsworth?) might have mounted +2, but that would’ve been too forward for my taste.
-
12-17-2019, 06:03 AM #3
Yep, I’m trying to find out where from true center that mark was.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-17-2019, 09:33 AM #4
IIRC, it was around -6.5 from center.
-
12-17-2019, 10:16 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 610
Still have a pair. Recommended is -6cm from TC.
When I switched from the metal Katana 184 to the Sickle 186 as my daily driver, I initially mounted the Sickle at +2cm (-4cm from TC) per Blister’s recommendation. It felt waaaay too far forward at the time. Remounted at - 6cm on the Sickle and skied it that way for 250-300 days.
But I think the reason it felt too far forward is because I was used to the Katana, mounted around -12cm from TC.
If you are used to progressive mounts of around -3 cm from TC (like the Black Ops 118 or Bentchetler 120 or the Kartel series), then mounting the Sickle +2cm of rec will probably feel better than the rec’d line.
-
12-17-2019, 10:30 AM #6
It skis pretty well anywhere -4 to 7. It was ahead of its time.
-
12-17-2019, 04:11 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Posts
- 15
-3 cm
-
12-17-2019, 05:48 PM #8
Thanks for the responses, guys!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-17-2019, 08:42 PM #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Golden B.C.
- Posts
- 626
I own 4 pairs. -7cm from true centre is the 0 mark.
-
12-17-2019, 08:47 PM #10
Hah! You guys trolling or was their manufacturing quality really that bad?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-17-2019, 08:58 PM #11
Such a great ski. I miss them so much.
-
12-17-2019, 09:02 PM #12
Same here. About to try the Folsom Primary SRC as a replacement. Was on +2 on the Sickles and I think the equivalent on the Primary comes to -4.5.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-18-2019, 03:25 PM #13
I went -1.5 on mine and wouldn't change a thing. Still a daily driver on anything softer, and will miss 'em when they're gone. Word on the street is that 4frnt Devastators may be a good replacement, looking for thoughts...?
"if you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind..."
-
12-18-2019, 04:24 PM #14
Really depends on how much you love the reverse camber. It‘s more exaggerated on the Devs and the platform felt a lot shorter unless on edge, whereas Sickles were more flat camber.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-18-2019, 05:25 PM #15
Thanks for the info- guess I'm still looking---------------------
That takes them out for me"if you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind..."
Bookmarks