Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
12-03-2019, 07:51 PM #1
Shumanitutonka Ob' Wachi
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- With the Plebes...
- Posts
- 1,188
FS in Bozeman: Faction "Thirteen's", 194cm, mounted once for Pivots, good condition
Located in Bozangeles. I'm pulling a pair of bindings off this pair of skis--mounted once for FKS/Look Pivot's with a 316 BSL. Normal wear and tear... some scratching on the bases but no core shorts, compressed edges, etc.
Profile: 135 / 112 / 132
194cm, 46m turning radius, sandwich construction, Poplar and Ash cores... Early-rise tip and flat camber. Pretty damned stiff ski for all of you hard-charging maggot tgr badasses.
Thinking $175 shipped or $125 local sale. Price police?
Click here to increase your vocabulary.
-
12-03-2019, 08:19 PM #2
Grave Robber
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 1,219
I got all excited for a minute, but I think that 46m turning radius is a typo. With that sidecut the effective edge would have to be longer than the ski.
-
12-03-2019, 08:20 PM #3
Registered Lurker
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Bellevue
- Posts
- 7,449
It's not. Pretty sure those were really 46m. I wanted a pair when I lived in Utah. Still kind of do, but I don't think I need them
-
12-03-2019, 08:27 PM #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Driving2VT
- Posts
- 4,598
Not following the EE>ski length logic
Uno mas
-
12-04-2019, 02:18 AM #5
one-track mind
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- NorCal
- Posts
- 2,285
The error is in the published tail width number. Most websites publish the erroneous “135-112-132”, but the manufacturer likely intended “135-112-122”, which is printed on the graphics of my 2010 version of this model, which I measured as actual widths are 135-112-120.
Originally Posted by lucknau
.- TRADE your heavy PROTESTS for my lightweight version at this thread
"My biggest goal in life has always been to pursue passion and to make dreams a reality. I love my daughter, but if I had to quit my passions for her, then I would be setting the wrong example for her, and I would not be myself anymore. " -Shane
"I'm gonna go SO OFF that NO ONE's ever gonna see what I'm gonna do!" -Saucerboy
-
12-04-2019, 03:02 AM #6
Grave Robber
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 1,219
Every photo I can find shows 135-112-132, including a photo of the 2013 model topsheet. 122 tail width seems more typical compared to other skis. Originally Posted by Vitamin I
Maybe the dimensions changed after 2010. Either 46m is wrong or 29m is wrong for the shorter ski. For the 2014 model, Evo says the 194 has a 36m turn radius. That works out mathematically for both lengths.
Anyway, they look like some bad mutha uckas.
-
12-04-2019, 03:13 AM #7
Grave Robber
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 1,219
Hmm. Here’s a photo of the 2011 model topsheet 135-112-122, 46m
-
12-09-2019, 12:58 PM #8
Shumanitutonka Ob' Wachi
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- With the Plebes...
- Posts
- 1,188
Bump for Manly Man Skis.
Click here to increase your vocabulary.
-
01-14-2020, 12:42 PM #9
Shumanitutonka Ob' Wachi
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- With the Plebes...
- Posts
- 1,188
Sold to bclive2ski... a local mountain of a man. Hope to see some pictures of your straightlining headwaters lines in those bad hombres. Nice meeting you today.
Click here to increase your vocabulary.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks