Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    340

    FS: Boots (Rx130 LV, 27.5)(TLT7, 27) Shoes (Lowa Innox GTx, 45) (Dyna Feline, 11)

    - Lange RX 130 LV, Mens 27.5. From a few years ago but in great condtion. Probably about 20 days of use. Includes spoilers and all screws (stiffness adjustment). Note that I gilled the area around my 6th toe on the left liner. In other words, made some thin slits on the *outside* of the liner to allow it to flex a bit. I doubt you'd be able to tell and has negligible effect on warmth. Note that boots are actually 27.5, not 26.5 as listed originally (thanks, Poacher) $150 (free shipping to CONUS)

    - Dynafit TLT7 Expedition, Mens 27. Only used a handful of times before I admitted the last was too roomy for my narrow feet. Shells have a few scuffs but are in otherwise great shape (same for soles). Liners are almost new and haven't been cooked yet. I did have the 6th toe area punch on the left boot which is obvious on the shell but didn't actually seem to make much difference in fit for me. Price discounted accordingly. Expedition model has a warmer liner and is slightly heavier than Peformance version. $200 (free shipping to CONUS)

    - Lowa Innox GTX Lo, 45. NEW. I'm usually an US Mens 11 and these fit me well (I have another pair), despite the box saying US 11.5. Moderately narrow fit but these things are super durable hikers and the waterproofing has held up better than another other GTX shoe I've owned. $75+ship

    - Dynafit Feline, Mens US 11. NEW I had another pair of these in the past and liked them but these are for narrow feet only. Super light and fast on the trails with excellent tread. $50+ship

    Let me know if you have questions or want more pics. As I noted in a companion thread, free pick up in Jackson or I can drop them off when I pass through SLC on Fri, Nov 1.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215742.jpg 
Views:	129 
Size:	779.8 KB 
ID:	298979
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215753.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	904.5 KB 
ID:	298980
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215803.jpg 
Views:	130 
Size:	788.0 KB 
ID:	298981
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215822.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	794.2 KB 
ID:	298982
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215846.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	950.2 KB 
ID:	298983

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215432.jpg 
Views:	122 
Size:	851.8 KB 
ID:	298984
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215447.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	807.3 KB 
ID:	298985
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215507.jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	913.0 KB 
ID:	298986
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215523.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	872.9 KB 
ID:	298987
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215559.jpg 
Views:	111 
Size:	787.5 KB 
ID:	298988
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_215657.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	706.2 KB 
ID:	298989

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222347.jpg 
Views:	107 
Size:	955.8 KB 
ID:	298990
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222403.jpg 
Views:	107 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	298991
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222410.jpg 
Views:	107 
Size:	1,000.2 KB 
ID:	298992
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222419.jpg 
Views:	99 
Size:	911.0 KB 
ID:	298993

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222455.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	764.0 KB 
ID:	298994
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222519.jpg 
Views:	103 
Size:	930.6 KB 
ID:	298995
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222526.jpg 
Views:	103 
Size:	830.9 KB 
ID:	298996
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20191020_222539.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	993.2 KB 
ID:	298997
    Last edited by phattypowpow; 10-31-2019 at 10:19 PM. Reason: mistakenly said RX130 were 26.5, not 27.5

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    538
    You wear a size 8.5 ski boot and size 11 running shoes? Talk about sizing down.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    340
    Quote Originally Posted by KillerMonkey View Post
    You wear a size 8.5 ski boot and size 11 running shoes? Talk about sizing down.
    I know! I've actually always thought there was a disconnect between ski boot and shoe sizes. I'm normally a 27 ski boot which is plenty of space for my mostly low volume feet but I definitely an US11 in street shoes. I absolutely swim in 28 ski boots. The Rx130 is an anomaly, I think - the 26.5s feel as big as my other 27/27.5 boots.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    340
    Shipping now included in price for ski boots. Open to non-lowball offers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    156
    PM sent

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,845
    Quote Originally Posted by KillerMonkey View Post
    You wear a size 8.5 ski boot and size 11 running shoes? Talk about sizing down.
    I'm the same -- but I think its because running shoes run "small" for their label, and ski boots run "big."

    Typically I'm 11.5 in any running shoe. I can wear either 26 (typically with work) or 27 (always LV) ski boots depending on the last. Most of my dress shoes are 10US.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    214
    Hey - I also trail run in Dynafits and wear a size 11 in the Feline Vertical Pro (Dynafit sizing is absurd). And I'm also a size 26.5/27 in ski boots.

    Wondering if these Dynafits are more narrow than past iterations?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    340
    I'm guessing they are probably similar. I've found Dynafit shoes (like many Euro brands) to be somewhat narrow but not extreme. I am a 27/27.5 and they felt snug (I owned another pair) but not uncomfortable for my narrowish feet with modest 6th toes.

    Quote Originally Posted by TWODIEFOUR View Post
    Hey - I also trail run in Dynafits and wear a size 11 in the Feline Vertical Pro (Dynafit sizing is absurd). And I'm

    also a size 26.5/27 in ski boots.

    Wondering if these Dynafits are more narrow than past iterations?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    an old saloon
    Posts
    205
    Quote Originally Posted by phattypowpow View Post
    - Lange RX 130 LV, Mens 26.5. From a few years ago but in great condtion. Probably about 20 days of use. I'm usually a 27 but these are a pretty roomy for a 26.5. Includes spoilers and all screws (stiffness adjustment).
    Not an expert, but this might explain why they felt so roomy for a 26.5.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	27.5 Lange.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	181.2 KB 
ID:	300406
    Crippled but free, I was blind all the time, I was learning to 'ski'.

    The best backcountry advice ever given on the TGR forums:

    Quote Originally Posted by skibee View Post
    Tits are a good thing, if making a good decision so you can live to see tits again is all that motivates you then so be it!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    340
    Oh, this is embarrassing! Thanks for the keen eye, Poacher - and letting me off relatively easy. I would have bet good money that they were 26.5. Fixing title description now...

    Quote Originally Posted by Teh Poacher View Post
    Not an expert, but this might explain why they felt so roomy for a 26.5.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	27.5 Lange.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	181.2 KB 
ID:	300406

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    8
    PM'd about the Langes

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    been looking for this exact boot. pm'd on langes if brett denison doesn't want them or can't pm you due to post count...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •