Page 30 of 524 FirstFirst ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... LastLast
Results 726 to 750 of 13097

Thread: Ask the experts

  1. #726
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,318
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    Moved from SRAM to Shimano to now Magura. All different flavors of struggle
    Simple pretty much nails the cause, but having accepted toast's door number 3 I've finally figured one thing out: Magura (MT4/MT5) needs more volume in reserve. This can be addressed by adding a few drops of fluid periodically as the pads wear. Annoying, but not too bad if you remember not to go tight on the bleed screw.

  2. #727
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    I think he needs to ask himself 5 questions:
    1) do I want a brake that has a history of failure that might be fixed (or maybe not), or
    2) do I want a brake that has a 60% chance of occasionally, and without warning, pulling all the way to the bar, or
    3) do I want a brake with bleed fittings that'll strip out and with pads that aren't super common, or
    4) do I want brakes that are unproven and are built by a company that seems to be perpetually on the verge of bankruptcy, or
    5) do I want to spend way more money on something that's fancy and may or may not work well, but no one really knows because only like 17 people on the planet actually own them?

    Pick your poison.
    1 and 2 is obviously SRAM and Shimano, and I seem to recall the bleed port issue Magura. 4 is...Hayes? Hope? TRP? 5 is...Trickstuff?

  3. #728
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    13,985
    4 is Hayes. They are nice.

    Re Magura. Don't gorilla the bleed port. And keep stock of pads.

  4. #729
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    1 and 2 is obviously SRAM and Shimano, and I seem to recall the bleed port issue Magura. 4 is...Hayes? Hope? TRP? 5 is...Trickstuff?
    Yeah, 4 is Hayes. 5 I was thinking of Trickstuff, although it could probably apply to others. I think HAB covered Hope. Kinda forgot about TRP, but I'm sure there's something wrong with them (pads hard to find, etc.).

  5. #730
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,453
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    All this brake talk has me pondering the old question...

    Why do mountain bike brakes suck?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Current brakes suck?!
    You're obviously a lot younger than many of us.
    You didn't ride mountain bikes with canti-brakes.
    After living with cantis, we fell in love with vee-brakes.
    After living with vees, we loved cable discs.
    After living with cable discs, we loved the first gen hydro discs.
    After living with the first gen hydro discs, we loved the better, 2nd gen, hydro discs.
    And now?...
    Current disc brakes are amazing. Take XTs, for instance; reliable, cheap, blind monkey easy to bleed, and will stop a train.
    You have no idea how good you have it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  6. #731
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hyperspace!
    Posts
    1,370
    ^^^^ truth

  7. #732
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    6,686
    Nail on head. For fucks sake, even Shimano Deore bakes work shockingly well. Better than anything available 10 years ago.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    However many are in a shit ton.

  8. #733
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Yeah, 4 is Hayes. 5 I was thinking of Trickstuff, although it could probably apply to others. I think HAB covered Hope. Kinda forgot about TRP, but I'm sure there's something wrong with them (pads hard to find, etc.).
    TRP was smart enough to just use Shimano pads, so there's that.


    I'm not quite old enough to have done much mountain biking on cantis, but was around for v brakes. Yes, brakes now are vastly better than they used to be, but I 100% agree with Toast that most stuff out there has some significant downside still. Just because things are better than they once were doesn't mean that there isn't still a ton of room for improvement.

  9. #734
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    TRP was smart enough to just use Shimano pads, so there's that.
    Ah, right. I forgot about that.

    I guess that settles it. TRP wins.

    At least until they sell a million units and it turns out they have inherent problems that just passed by unnoticed when they were only moving (relatively) tiny volumes of product.

  10. #735
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,761

    Ask the experts

    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Current brakes suck?!
    You're obviously a lot younger than many of us.
    You didn't ride mountain bikes with canti-brakes.
    After living with cantis, we fell in love with vee-brakes.
    After living with vees, we loved cable discs.
    After living with cable discs, we loved the first gen hydro discs.
    After living with the first gen hydro discs, we loved the better, 2nd gen, hydro discs.
    And now?...
    Current disc brakes are amazing. Take XTs, for instance; reliable, cheap, blind monkey easy to bleed, and will stop a train.
    You have no idea how good you have it.
    I started riding in the cable disc era... so sure you have a point... hydro disc brakes are amazing when they are working solid.. but you know what always worked, my old cable discs on my $500 Kona Cindercone...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  11. #736
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,126
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Current brakes suck?!
    You're obviously a lot younger than many of us.
    You didn't ride mountain bikes with canti-brakes.
    After living with cantis, we fell in love with vee-brakes.
    After living with vees, we loved cable discs.
    After living with cable discs, we loved the first gen hydro discs.
    After living with the first gen hydro discs, we loved the better, 2nd gen, hydro discs.
    And now?...
    Current disc brakes are amazing. Take XTs, for instance; reliable, cheap, blind monkey easy to bleed, and will stop a train.
    You have no idea how good you have it.
    This.

    Some of that old stuff was truly terrible and a PITA to work on. U-brakes under the chain stays.... Canti cable hangers that were integrated into quill stems... roller brakes...
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  12. #737
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    Sorry but XT brakes are not "amazing"

    They are cheap and break easily. Strong feeling sure but not amazing. Respect to the old heads (I am one) but it is just an above average brake for average riders.

  13. #738
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,885
    I think everyone might have a different tak, the oldest stlyle brakes sucked, canti were better, u brake under the bottm bracket was a dumb spot but worked ok, V brakes were pretty good, hayes hydros broke lots, BB7's were just as powerful as hayes but no modulation but also no breakdowns, juicy meh and lately the shimano seem awesume
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  14. #739
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by simple View Post
    Sorry but XT brakes are not "amazing"

    They are cheap and break easily. Strong feeling sure but not amazing. Respect to the old heads (I am one) but it is just an above average brake for average riders.
    Yup.

    Since the canti era, most of the brakes I've been on were decent for their time. But they all had problems. The current crop of brakes are the best yet, but particularly in the "trail" category, there's still a lot of room for improvement. There is no option currently on the market that is clearly superior.

  15. #740
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    4,867
    Quote Originally Posted by simple View Post
    Sorry but XT brakes are not "amazing"
    They are cheap and break easily. Strong feeling sure but not amazing. Respect to the old heads (I am one) but it is just an above average brake for average riders.
    Pretty hard to group all "XT" brakes in the same boat. Which ones are the cheap ones that break easily:
    XT 8120 ?
    XT 8100 ?
    XT 8020 ?
    XT 8000 ?
    XT 785 ?
    Or do we need to go back to before 2011?

  16. #741
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee Hubbs View Post
    Pretty hard to group all "XT" brakes in the same boat. Which ones are the cheap ones that break easily:
    XT 8120 ?
    XT 8100 ?
    XT 8020 ?
    XT 8000 ?
    XT 785 ?
    Or do we need to go back to before 2011?
    Pretty sure he was talking about the '96 v-brakes.

    Edit: I also think it's funny how militant the defenders of XT brakes are, despite those things having well documented, significant problems.

  17. #742
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,126
    I will accept all XT hydraulic brakes that are unwanted, and give them a good home.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  18. #743
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,453
    Quote Originally Posted by simple View Post
    Sorry but XT brakes are not "amazing"

    They are cheap and break easily. Strong feeling sure but not amazing. Respect to the old heads (I am one) but it is just an above average brake for average riders.
    What exactly breaks so easily on XTs?
    I owned a shop for 5 years and the amount of XT brake issues could fit on one hand with several fingers left. Can't say that about lots of others mentioned here.
    Perfect? No.
    Neither is a Toyota Tacoma but it's still a pretty damn good truck.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  19. #744
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    Well yeah it isn't like an Elixer or Guide with massive warranty returns.

    You may not have seen many because they are so cheap to replace and Shimano warranty is no where near as easy as SRAM.

    I had constant issues with roasted pistons and the lever seals leaking. Nothing a bleed could fix. Always had to throw them away. Nice to be able to buy individual levers and calipers I guess.

  20. #745
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    6,686

    Ask the experts

    To clarify, modern brakes are like modern tubeless systems. Pretty damn awesome if you started riding more than 5 years ago. Vastly better performing and more reliable than their predecessors.
    Sometimes challenging. Usually not. Room for improvement? Sure, but we’re talking about gaining small fractions of progression.
    Unfortunately, like with dropper posts, the industry thinks we want something just a little “better” when we really want something more reliable.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    However many are in a shit ton.

  21. #746
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    The bike industry doesn't want reliable. They want you to buy new shit constantly if you love the sport.

    Engineered to last only if you use it lightly. Once you ride the shit out of them bicycles and their parts wear and break.


    So yeah you could be on a bike from 1996 still. You are a casual user and likely can't ride like you did in 1996 anymore. All good.

  22. #747
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,857
    I am trying to find an xt 9 speed rt shifter and striking out. Antony know if a sram index shifter is compatible? Seems like all of the 9 speed shifters are I back order. Is this a covid thing, or just the bike is too old thing?

    Thanks

  23. #748
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Sram 9 speed won't work, unless you can find the non-series version that is designed to work with Shimano. Those were called Attack or something like that.

    There are some low end Shimano 9 speed shifters still being made but looking for XT level is a "your bike is too old" thing.

  24. #749
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Yeah, 4 is Hayes.
    n=1 and you're well aware of my biases, but I totaled up my Strava stats from last year and it looks like I did about 60,000 feet of descending between the time I installed my Dominions in July and when I scrambled my brain in late October. No fade, no squeal, no wandering bite, no need for a bleed, nada. That was all on one set of semi-metallic pads that still had some life left (I weigh about 165 geared up), though I replaced them this spring with a set of the sintered pads anyway (that I already had because the brakes come with both sets). The flippable levers are also a nice touch.

    There's a big thread on MTBR where people do report some problems. The most commonly reported problem, which isn't all that common, is sticky pistons not retracting fully. Some piston exercising seems to fix it, and it's easy to do with their bleed block. Hayes going out of business seems unlikely: https://hayesperformance.com/markets/
    Last edited by Dantheman; 06-04-2020 at 03:39 PM.

  25. #750
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,845
    ^^^ yeah, I'm hearing a lot of good things about the new hayes stuff. Definitely curious to try them.

    And yeah, in fairness, they probably won't go bankrupt. They could pull out of the bicycle game though (which they've done in the past).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •