Results 76 to 100 of 135
Thread: Better Schools Won’t Fix America
-
06-12-2019, 08:57 AM #76Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- In Your Wife
- Posts
- 8,291
-
06-12-2019, 09:02 AM #77
-
06-12-2019, 09:19 AM #78Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 304
-
06-12-2019, 09:29 AM #79
Term limits move the nexus of power from elected politicians towards lobbyists and ex-politicians. What is needed are voters effecting term limits and so whats necessary is more competitive districts. Reduce gerrymandering, and get your local opposition party(s) to put good candidates on the ballot.
-
06-12-2019, 09:39 AM #80Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 304
Is there any way to make lobbying a crime punishable by death? Of all things wrong with this country, lobbying seems to be one of the most insidious. By undermining the voice of the electorate you suppress participation & it spirals from there. Elections are pointless if some clown can step in and drive the agenda.
-
06-12-2019, 10:00 AM #81
-
06-12-2019, 10:33 AM #82Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
.375 or .5 or .75
The problem with gerrymandering is the same people who would have to vote for a law against it are in congress because of it. We need a constitutional amendment.
-
06-12-2019, 10:35 AM #83
-
06-12-2019, 10:38 AM #84Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 304
Do you...have any eights
-
06-12-2019, 10:39 AM #85
Personally, I love the idea. And I like Warren.
But this:
Michael Bennet and Elizabeth Warren want members of Congress to ban themselves from ever lobbying after they leave office. Here’s why it’ll never happen.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...n-2020/590182/Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
-
06-12-2019, 10:55 AM #86
My friend phrased it as three eighths, and they seemed to like that answer, but he didn't get the job.
-
06-12-2019, 11:26 AM #87
How do you ban lobbying without banning all constituents from communicating with their elected reps?
Example - I consult for a company that makes equipment for indoor plant cultivation. I just sent Rep Blumenauer an email asking he seek a minor amendment to proposed SAFE Banking Act that would allow my client to be protected just like our cannabis-producing customers. Would also apply to landlords that rent to cannabis grows, and a lot of other businesses.
Is that lobbying?
-
06-12-2019, 11:39 AM #88
You would have to regulate the channels of access these constituents have to the lawmakers. Every citizen and company gets equal time/access to pre set meeting times, town halls, etc. No more private meetings set aside for large donors. That would probably mean lotteries and other methods to divvy up the times available on the law maker's schedule. It would also probably be tied to campaign finance reform to eliminate the large donations altogether.
Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!
-
06-12-2019, 11:42 AM #89Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 304
I don't know. The exchange of value is where the influence seems to be problematic. So campaign finance on the front end and post-office appointments to boards, favors that help family, etc on the back end. In general, the concept of someone being paid specifically to influence the action of a legislator seems odious. In practice your example is innocuous but if it opens the door to those things above it's destructive overall. I see the influence of an individual as legitimate - you writing to Rep. B personally - whereas the "on behalf of company X, who stands to benefit if you would simply do Y" seems to be where the ethics fall apart. Where do you think the slippery slope starts?
-
06-12-2019, 11:48 AM #90
I wrote on behalf of my client, so looks like I’m already sliding down at least a green circle slope.
Agreed that much of lobbying is odious, but finding where to draw the line is tough
And getting a Congress critter to vote to make it harder to finance a campaign just ain’t gonna happen. McCain and Feingold tried for years and failed. The current crop of Congress has way less spine
-
06-12-2019, 12:02 PM #91
As long as the vast majority of citizens refuse to look beyond what their team tells them and call things that disagree with their beliefs Fake News we are fucked.
-
06-12-2019, 12:39 PM #92
Back to the nationwide dumbing down of the general public thanks to 20 plus years of horrible public education and exponential cost increase of private and college educational opportunities. Unless that changes, it's not just fucked, it will keep getting worse and worse..
Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!
-
06-12-2019, 12:58 PM #93
One of the most brilliant political maneuvers in centuries was to start covering the same news events differently to convince people there is no such thing as factual information...and that their gut feelings are more important than difficult, challenging, uncomfortable processes of discovery.
Telling poor uncomfortable pissed-off people their enemy is other poor pissed-off people so they fight each other. The awful douchebags pull the strings and the fucking idiots march into battle. It’s grim.
-
06-12-2019, 01:04 PM #94Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
^^which is why it circles back around to education, and why you keep hearing spending money on it it doesn't work - because it does and that fact threatens the douchebags' ability to keep controlling people, and those people control the media.
-
06-12-2019, 01:17 PM #95Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
-
06-12-2019, 01:33 PM #96
Bromontane - have you ever volunteered or done gov work? Building palatable solutions for all is largely thankless and unprofitable.
Are there problems with many of the candidates and people out there in government? Sure, but don't let perfect be the enemy of good or better.
Throwing your hands up and saying they're all bad is willful ignorance.
-
06-12-2019, 01:50 PM #97
-
06-12-2019, 02:10 PM #98Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 304
Volunteer work yes but no direct govt work (though my s.o. is in govt service). A brother works in policy for the federal govt & he just visited earlier this year. So I have an idea of how it's more complex than prior posts might suggest. My brother spends much of his time running policy proposals through political, economic & outcome filters. When that's done there's usually very little leftover. Maybe most concerning is watching someone I know to have good character, intentions, education & power fall into the same, tired pattern of accepting things like political unpopularity as a proposal-killer rather than taking risks (gotta mind the career). Even with failure, there're lessons. But, at least on a Federal level, things are too dysfunctional to allow the healthy dynamic of experimentation and learning to take root. If there is no room for a virtuous cycle like goal setting, executing, evaluating & improving then the solution seems to be disengagement & hedging wherever possible. Support the AOCs of the world but keep expectations anchored to the floor.
-
06-12-2019, 02:40 PM #99
-
06-12-2019, 02:48 PM #100
"Truthiness," as explained 14 years ago:
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/63ite2...d---truthiness
Bookmarks