Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 33 of 33
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,404
    Name:  ballz.jpg
Views: 598
Size:  27.4 KB

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,001
    What foggy said. Ability and preference is the answer. Ability=strength and skill. Preference=where you are skiing and how you want to ski it. Height may play a role but you need some pretty long levers vs someone whose really strong. Heavy dudes can bend a ski more but only as speed increases. Do they have the ability to control it? Now build in sidecut and how a ski flexes. I’ll leave that topic to the gynecologists. Pretty easy formula for deciding on length huh? Go ski. You’ll figure it out.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,695
    5'9" 165. Fairly advanced skier. Rule of thumb has always been one size down from the longest offering by the manufacturer. 186 is my standard, but I've been told now that I'm old I should be sizing down to 177ish. I've never skied anything that short. Will I hate it? Considering one of the new mantras or some other frontside/crud/non-deep pow ski.

    It'll definitely be more maneuverable and likely fine... but I tend to decide after a few turns that I need to haul ass for the rest of the day. Genuinely scared of sizing down for the first time in my life.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,948
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    5'9" 165. Fairly advanced skier. Rule of thumb has always been one size down from the longest offering by the manufacturer. 186 is my standard, but I've been told now that I'm old I should be sizing down to 177ish. I've never skied anything that short. Will I hate it? Considering one of the new mantras or some other frontside/crud/non-deep pow ski.

    It'll definitely be more maneuverable and likely fine... but I tend to decide after a few turns that I need to haul ass for the rest of the day. Genuinely scared of sizing down for the first time in my life.
    Dont let people tell you you're old. Get a 192 and change it up

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    As so many others have stipulated, there is so much more to this than height and weight of skier. Ski shape (philosophy), rocker profile, flex, intended use, terrain of most frequent use, preferred turn shape, ability and preferences of the rider...

    I'm 6'0 and 220lbs and stay away from anything under 190cm. My resort crushers are 196 and I'd like to get a hold of something over 200cm. The only ski in my quiver under 190 is a 184 pair of race stock gs skis. I have not even considered bd skis for this reason. Both my touring skis (pow and low tide) are 192 and any claim of this being an uphill impediment are patently absurd unless I one day contemplate a ski strictly devoted to multi-day traverses. Even then it would have to be 185 minimum. My balance does not suck.

    No one can truly answer this for you unless you have a regular ski partner who is a consumate gear nerd and also able to remove all personal biases to give you accurate feedback. Given these factors, get the longest red ones you can find.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,939
    Speed > weight > height. Back in the day I had a custom detuned billy goat made for my nuts to ride on, but looks like i'm mellowing out in my TGR sunset years. quiv is currently in motion

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,273
    Generally speaking the manufacturer takes into consideration terrain, expected snow condition, construction and shape of the ski in setting the range of lengths of a given model. So for the same skier piste skis < powder skis. Take the ski you love best, figure out where in the available range of lengths for that ski your ski is and usually you'll be happy with skis in the same relative length in other makes and models. Example--if your favorite ski is the second longest length for that model (me), you'll most likely be happy with the second longest ski in another make and model, at least until you get into the downward part of life (me again). (Please don't ask me what to do if your favorite ski comes in 3 lengths and the new ski comes in 4. Flip a coin I guess.)

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    Generally speaking the manufacturer takes into consideration terrain, expected snow condition, construction and shape of the ski in setting the range of lengths of a given model. So for the same skier piste skis < powder skis. Take the ski you love best, figure out where in the available range of lengths for that ski your ski is and usually you'll be happy with skis in the same relative length in other makes and models. Example--if your favorite ski is the second longest length for that model (me), you'll most likely be happy with the second longest ski in another make and model, at least until you get into the downward part of life (me again). (Please don't ask me what to do if your favorite ski comes in 3 lengths and the new ski comes in 4. Flip a coin I guess.)
    and then get the red ones man
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •