Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    take a guess
    Posts
    2,213

    Any reviews on the Full Tilt Ascendant

    Just wondering if anyone has had any time on the Full Tilt Ascendant? I know it's a new boot, but there is only one video online about it (from one of their athletes), and couldn't find much info on here. Thanks in advance!
    Magic Mountain Freeride Team...bringing your grom's game to the next level.

    The only ski you'll ever need...http://worthskis.com/skis/the-magic/

    "Errare Humanum Est"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    8,515
    Quote Originally Posted by njfreeskier View Post
    Just wondering if anyone has had any time on the Full Tilt Ascendant? I know it's a new boot, but there is only one video online about it (from one of their athletes), and couldn't find much info on here. Thanks in advance!
    that athlete in the video is my husband, who occasionally posts here too
    He's been skiing the ascendant as his main set of boots now for the 2nd season (and obviously we have a shelf full of FT's to choose from)

    The boot itself is a little shorter than our alpine FT's, which lends itself to be a little softer overall.
    He added boosters and for in bounds skiing (JH) he switches out the stock liner and uses his intuitions from his 1st chairs bc they are a little taller and adds a little stiffness.
    He's 6' and not too heavy- like 170lbs and he kept the stock tongue. (he rolls an oversized 10 tongue on his 1st chairs which equates to maybe an 11 flex)
    but I have been surprised that he always chooses the ascendants over his alpine boots this yr
    I dig the ascendant buckles too vs my 1st chairs. They don't get the snow build up issues I sometimes have with 1st chairs
    The boot is slightly wider in the forefoot than 1st chairs, which is well documented as well as their being slightly heavier than other touring boots.
    what else do you want to know about and I'll ask him his thoughts
    skid luxury

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Interesting. The Tour Wrap from intuition is definitely different than this wrap:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot 2019-01-23 11.19.01.png 
Views:	237 
Size:	886.9 KB 
ID:	266037  
    Attached Images Attached Images  


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Has anyone here skied this liner?


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,163
    @njfreeskier. I got to try on the prototype side by side with my lupo TI last year.

    Cuff is noticeably shorter on the Ascendent, Which is why I have kept my lupo.

    12 tongue sounds cool though.
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    56
    I havent been able to find an ascendant to try on, but having been in full tilts before and having wide feet im sure itd be a good fit. I have tried on the lupo ax120, it was a great fit, but wasnt a fan of the liner and it felt soft for a 120.
    Whats the negative/positive of a short cuff? im wondering if being used to park boots/skiing, if i'd like the short cuff more possibly? Cuff height isnt something i've really factored in before.

    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    @njfreeskier. I got to try on the prototype side by side with my lupo TI last year.

    Cuff is noticeably shorter on the Ascendent, Which is why I have kept my lupo.

    12 tongue sounds cool though.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    I prefer a tall cuff. Especially if you are tall. More control over the ski, more support.

    Imagine extremes to visualize it: a ski boot only as tall as a hiking boot.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    511
    How’s the heel pocket and instep? I’ve got a huuuuge instep and a baby ankle.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    8,515
    somewhere in another thread about this boot I posted side by side picks of it's height next to my lupos
    I'll try to find and post here

    it's a touch shorter but doesn't seem to hold andrew back :P
    skid luxury

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    612

    Any reviews on the Full Tilt Ascendant

    Quote Originally Posted by b-bear View Post
    somewhere in another thread about this boot I posted side by side picks of it's height next to my lupos
    I'll try to find and post here

    it's a touch shorter but doesn't seem to hold andrew back :P
    It’s funny how little difference there is in measured cuff heights and how big of a difference there is in feeling between the Ascendant/Descendant shell and the original FT/Raichle shell. I’ve been squarely in the camp of taller cuffs since riding the original Kryptons back in the day, so it only took a quick side-by-side fitting to switch from my beat to hell FTs back to Dalbello and the Lupos.

    Side note: What ever happened to knee-height cuffs?
    Name:  IMG_3673.JPG
Views: 5479
Size:  32.2 KB

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    38
    I really want to like this boot because I have been looking for a hybrid boot like this, and I have a little bit of a wider foot, and these fit in the fore foot, but after trying them on I wasn't a huge fan of the shorter cuff. I'm sure they ski just fine however, and if you're a Full Tilt guy and are looking for a "freeride/touring" hybrid boot, this maybe just what you're looking for. YMMV, but I think after trying on both the ascendant and the Nordica strider, the strider still has my heart.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    56
    I tried on last years lupo ti id today, which i think is a 130 flex, and wasnt a fan, didnt get that pre flexed sensation i've gotten from other dalbello's/ FT's. Which is 90% of the reason I like them so much, being able to have a pretty stiff boot but really flex through the initial flex of the boot without too much resistance, I think i've just really gotten used to skiing with a boot that allows that much movement. the Ti id kept your legs pretty locked in position unless you really forced it, which i really dont like.
    Was trying to think of how a shorter cuff with that same flex would feel, if that would create more of a "flexing from the ankle" sensation, where a taller cuff has that feeling of driving the ski from your shin/upper part of the cuff?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,880
    For the love of fucking God, all I want is tech inserts and a walk mode in the original FT/Raichle shell.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    For the love of fucking God, all I want is tech inserts and a walk mode in the original FT/Raichle shell.
    The Ascendant is very much not that, FT kinda missed the boat on that one. It wouldn't have been the boot for me, but I think it would have been a better route to go with a hybrid "tour-able" boot than the one they chose. Always next year though...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Portlandia
    Posts
    2,724
    The Descendent/Ascendant shell is a fucking bucket.
    Training for Alpental

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    For the love of fucking God, all I want is tech inserts and a walk mode in the original FT/Raichle shell.
    Add buckles that don't fuck up multiple times a year and take my money.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by Reformed View Post
    Add buckles that don't fuck up multiple times a year and take my money.
    I had good luck with their metal buckles after breaking a couple of the original plastic ones.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,364
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    For the love of fucking God, all I want is tech inserts and a walk mode in the original FT/Raichle shell.
    You and a few thousand others . . .

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by burrito View Post
    I had good luck with their metal buckles after breaking a couple of the original plastic ones.
    I'm pretty aware/careful with my stuff and am running metal buckles but have still had to replace 3 of 6 over the last few years. Lower cables break reasonably frequently as well. The good news is that they're easy to work on and FT usually has parts, but there's something to say about the basic buckles and ladders on most other boots...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Do you guys just toss your boots around after taking them off without buckling them?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Driggs
    Posts
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    For the love of fucking God, all I want is tech inserts and a walk mode in the original FT/Raichle shell.
    Next year's Roxa R3 130 is damn close to this. I love mine, didn't jive with the Ascendant, but used to only rock Konflicts. R3 is like a heat moldable Konflict with a walk mode and tech fittings. And it weighs way less than the Ascendant.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by cydwhit View Post
    Next year's Roxa R3 130 is damn close to this. I love mine, didn't jive with the Ascendant, but used to only rock Konflicts. R3 is like a heat moldable Konflict with a walk mode and tech fittings. And it weighs way less than the Ascendant.
    Tried the R3 130s on at SIA this year and talked with a rep for a while. They seemed to use a really weird last shape. I have a narrow foot, medium instep, and low volume ankle, so I expect most boots to feel a little too big at first (and consequently why I love the narrow fit of the original FT/Raichle shell.) The Roxa boots were just strange - really snug in some areas, roomy in others. I suppose molding would take care of some of that, but they’re definitely not a boot I would recommend as a blind buy for anyone. That said, their walk mode and flex seemed pretty great.

    I have been rocking the current-gen Dalbello Lupo 130C all season and been extremely happy with them. They fit very similar to the original FT/Raichle shell. Unless we get a non-Descendant shell FT with a walk mode, I plan on sticking with the Lupos.
    Last edited by burrito; 04-03-2019 at 02:50 PM.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    1

    durability question?

    What's your experience with durability? Some of the reviews I've read say the area around the tech inserts got chewed up to the point of being unusable pretty quickly, I've also heard complaints about the buckles breaking. Thanks.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    8,515
    skied the ascendant a couple times now and I love how it skis almost exactly like my FT First chairs.
    I had Dalbello lupos & maestrales in the past and always hated how they skied- just really having to totally adjust my skiing style for them, whereas if you ski Full Tilts or Dalbellos for alpine these are the easiest cross over I've found.

    Have only done 1 tour up snow king but I was basically looking for a boot that has touring mode but still skied downhill well too and these are the answer.
    I mean, they are only 10% lighter than my alpine boots but considering that I hated my old touring boots so much that I would literally tour in my 1st chairs for anything under 2 hours, I'm psyched
    I switched over my alpine liners for inbounds on recommendation from andrew and that made them feel just like home as well as raising the height a bit and firming them up
    will add a booster strap and call it good. Feels like they have a hair more fwd lean than my first chairs but I also don't roll with any of the fwd lean inserts in my First chairs
    some scoff at these bc they are not that much lighter but I was tired of mediocre touring boots on the dh which is the reason I drag my keister uphill in the first place

    Quote Originally Posted by bearasaur9000 View Post
    What's your experience with durability? Some of the reviews I've read say the area around the tech inserts got chewed up to the point of being unusable pretty quickly, I've also heard complaints about the buckles breaking. Thanks.
    husband has been skiing these as his everyday- even at the resort and the buckles are holding up well- they are more standard hook style vs other FT's which have the ratchet.
    I'm skiing his pair from last yr- actually he got them 2 seasons ago mid- yr so he skied them a season and a half. the toes are a bit more chewed up than my alpines but more the general plastic being banged up vs around the tech inserts. maybe the plastic is a hair softer
    skid luxury

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •