PSA: Bruce’s Tremper webinar on avy terrain, 1/23/19

[MakersTeleMark]

https://avalanche.state.co.us/caic/a...=518&accfm=inv

[hafjell]

He briefly touched on it when he mentioned those who ski on slopes on the other side of the angle curve. Come down from 50 to 39, which is inevitable, and bam.

Good reminder that when you're done with the steep stuff, you're not done with the avalanche danger. In fact, the avy concerns may just be starting in earnest. Especially worth noting as lots of folks will post up in unsafe spots on lower angle terrain to take photos of their tracks on steeper terrain.
This is why, even though I skin and boot up every line I ski, I hire a pro photographer in a helicopter to record my lines. Expensive but worth it from a safety perspective.

[happytimefunbox]

This is why, even though I skin and boot up every line I ski, I hire a pro photographer in a helicopter to record my lines. Expensive but worth it from a safety perspective.

It's good to be king ehhhh?

[hafjell]

It's good to be king ehhhh?

Yep. Apparently a drone, or even just taking the photos from a safe stance would be much cheaper and better for the environment, but then I wouldn't feel as cool. Helos for the egos!

[MakersTeleMark]

Me too. I hate it when people do that.

[mall walker]

just got the recording emailed to me and watched it, thanks again for sharing that

[summit]

I registered but ended up not being able to watch!

EDIT: THANKS MEADOW!

[muted]

I registered but ended up not being able to watch!

EDIT: THANKS MEADOW!

Tonight I went to a terrain management class here in SLC thinking it was going to be similar to Bruce’s.....I don’t think it was, it was super basic info for first timers. Anyone got a link to Bruce’s presentation please?

[MakersTeleMark]

Maybe you could e-mail Marissa and ask for a link to it.

I signed up and watched it, but they never sent me one.

https://www.mountaineers.org/books/a...alanche-safety

[mall walker]

I have my link but it's coded to my email / registrant key so I doubt it'll work for anyone else. Search your email for customercare@gotowebinar.com that was the sender. Subject "We missed you at Terrain Choice - The Secret to Avalanche Safety"

edit: possibly they only sent this to folks who registered but did not attend...

[jono]

I signed up after it was over and the website went straight to the replay; looks like Meadowskipper's link is still live and probably still works.

Click. Give email. Watch. Never got an email from anyone, though.

[hafjell]

Bruce's answers to the questions he did not address during the talk.

Here are answers to the questions we did not get to during the avalanche webinar. Sorry for the late response. I’ve been booked up since the webinar and I just returned from Durango Colorado where I gave my last book tour talk of the winter with over 100 eager people crammed into a small venue.


First I should say that I address all of these questions in much more detail in the book. As I said at the beginning of the webinar, I was talking about only a very small portion of what was in the book. I first started answering the questions individually to the person who asked them and it occurred to me that everyone would probably be interested in all the questions, so I’m putting them all together here. So I apologize to those who are getting a second email from me.


Q: What's new in the 3rd edition?


A: I changed about 40 percent of the book. Here’s a summary of the most important changes:


•Reorganized around the Conceptual Model of Avalanche Hazard
•Terrain Shape – turns out there is no correlation
•Simplified way to teach terrain
•New Human Factors thinking
•Strategic Mindset ideas
•Updated model of avalanche failure and fracture
Q: Do you think there is a feasible way to bring down the cost of Avy 1 training to reach more people beyond avy awareness courses? The training required of instructors is, of course, a factor


A: There are many providers of avalanche classes who compete with each other and I don’t think you can get the costs down below what they are. Having taught many avalanche courses through the years, it’s a really hard job and I just don’t do it anymore because I got so burnt out.


But if you want just basic avalanche information online, there are many sources. Here are a few that I helped to produce:


•Search for Know Before You Go avalanche video on Vimeo
•Search for Off Piste on Vimeo
•Tutorials on the Utah Avalanche Information website: https://kbyg.org/learn/
Q: What about phone and transceiver interference when using a smartphone app for terrain evaluation?


A: You are supposed to power down your phone while using your transceiver to search but phones are fine otherwise. They don’t interfere with transmitting a signal unless you store the phone very close to your transceiver.


Q: When skiing in the woods, how can we best make an assessment whether the slope is safe? Tree skiing often becomes a second option, but how do we know that's any safer? What do we evaluate, tree spacing, etc?


A: There’s no hard-and-fast rule on the anchoring effect and snow stabilizing effect of trees. What has been taught for many years is that if the trees are thick enough that it’s hard to ski through, they probably provide enough anchoring to hold the slab in place. A better answer is that it’s a bit more nuanced. Evergreen trees such as spruce or fir that have branches frozen into the snow provide a lot more anchoring than trees without branches such as aspen or lodgepole pine. Trees also serve to stabilize the snow because they intercept outgoing heat radiation and shine it back on the snow, making the snow surface warmer. They also shed snowballs, which also help to stabilize the snow. So it’s a bit of an art. The bottom line is that if the trees are relatively sparse or if there is an open starting zone above the trees, they are probably obstacles instead of anchors.


Q: Do you have an opinion on the European exposure scale (E1, E2, & E3) as reliably measuring exposure or consequence?


A: Actually, this is the first time I’ve heard of the European exposure scale and I just spent 3 ½ months in Europe last summer. So I suspect it’s their name for the Canadian Avalanche Terrain Exposure Scale (ATES), which has become quite accepted and popular throughout the world. The ATES has three ratings, Simple, Challenging and Complex. It’s meant to be used as a general trip-planning tool. The terrain is rated using about a dozen parameters but here is a simplified description of it from the Canadians: https://www.avalanche.ca/tutorial/av...simple-terrain


I discuss ATES in the book, which works very well as a trip-planning tool, especially in Canada where they have already rated much of their popular terrain. In the US, which is much more poorly funded, we don’t have as many places that have been rated. The only downside of the ATES scale is that it’s meant to be used on a larger scale for trip planning and not necessarily designed for specific slopes. That’s why in the book, I present a simplified way to evaluate avalanche terrain mostly using steepness and consequences.


Q: Burial/Rescue question: It should be common knowledge by now that electronics (especially smart phones and other touch screen devices) can significantly impair transceiver transmission and search range. In the event of a burial, do you immediately power electronics down before searching? Call for a rescue first? what are your criteria?


A: Great question. Refer to a previous question about powering down electronics. As for when to call for a rescue, In the book, I describe several scenarios and discuss this in more detail. There has actually been a fair amount of controversy over when to call for a rescue. In Europe, the general algorithm recommended by Manuel Genswein is that if you feel like you can perform a successful rescue within 15 minutes, you should do so, then call for emergency services. I think this is a reasonable rule of thumb. You have to realize that in Europe, rescues are performed by the private sector—like ambulance drivers in the U.S. So they push people to call very early in the rescue process. In the U.S., rescue response is usually quite a bit slower because it’s more rural with longer distances to travel and less cell service. So it’s usually best to perform the rescue first, then call 911 if you feel you will need additional resources. But read the scenarios in the book for more details.


I should also clarify something else in your question: electronics interfere with transceiver searches, not necessarily transceiver signals being sent. So you should always powder down your cell phone when doing a transceiver search.


Q: any thoughts on adjusting terrain slope angles based upon the Avalanche Hazard (I.e. Wet Slide potential means reduction of slope angle on Radiation exposed terrain)?


A: Most of the book revolves around the basic concept that you choose appropriate terrain for a given snowpack hazard or danger rating. So you should read the book for details.


Q: Seems to be a lot of misinformation, curious your thoughts on Avy beacons for snowshoers using established summer trails in avy terrain?


A: Just because it’s an established summer trail does not mean that you don’t need basic avalanche rescue gear. I have investigated many avalanche accidents on established summer trails. You should practice standard trip-planning procedures that I talk about in the book.


Q: I see a cirque as a funnel.... when do you consider a cirque a safe place to ski?


A: Yes, a cirque is a concave slope that generally concentrates avalanche debris making it more dangerous. But the avalanche game is basically a tradeoff between the danger of the terrain and the danger of the snowpack. The only time you can go into dangerous terrain is when you have a very stable snowpack and the only terrain available to you with a dangerous snowpack is safe terrain. I dedicate much of the book to discussing this balance and how to manage it.


Q: Since you can remote trigger avalanche, how far away should you stay from avalanche-prone slope when you're in gentler and/or tree-dense terrain?


A: Good question. There’s no hard-and-fast rule and it’s a bit of an art. After watching many thousand of avalanches through the years, I’ve developed a pretty good intuitive feel for where avalanches will break in different kinds of conditions. This can’t be taught in a book. I suggest to students to go out when it’s dangerous and jump on lots of small, little slopes like a road cut, something 10 feet high or less, until you get a good feel for how avalanches behave during dangerous conditions.


Q: Any tips for performing ski cuts on test slopes?


A: I discuss this in quite a bit of detail in the book. But basically, keep your speed up and cross the slope at a 45-degree angle (or thereabouts) aiming for safe terrain, which will be your escape route in case the slope fractures. As you can imagine, this takes quite a bit of experience so be sure to practice a lot in very low consequence terrain.


Q: What app do you use to measure slope steepness?


A: The app I use to measure slope steepness is Theodolite, which I think is excellent. The Utah Avalanche Center app also is able to measure slope steepness in its Photo mode using the camera to sight down or up a slope. I’m sure there are many other apps. The most important advice is to sight up or down the slope and measure the steepest 10 x 10 meter section of the slope, which is the part of the slope that usually controls whether it will avalanche or not.





I hope this answers most of the questions we did not get to during the webinar. Please don’t email back for further discussion on any of these questions because I’m pretty booked up and I probably won’t have time to answer them. Please read the book first.





Stay safe and stay on top,





Bruce Tremper

[Bronic]

Thanks Bruce!