Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285

    PSA: Völkl BMT 94 (186 only) $350 shipped


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    my favorite spring touring ski I've ever been on. Turns out full reverse and stiff is $$ for a mid nineties underfoot touring ski

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    girdwood
    Posts
    489
    Grabbed a pair. Thanks for the heads up.

    Quote Originally Posted by rangerjake View Post

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    7B Selkirks USA
    Posts
    923
    Tempting

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,910
    Thanks for the heads up! I bought a pair.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    954
    Do these ski long or can they be pivoty like some other reverse cambered skis?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    Free shipping + additional 10% off the sale price too. Boom.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,910
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    Free shipping + additional 10% off the sale price too. Boom.
    Zactly, fkna what a sale! $1000 off, lol
    Quote Originally Posted by GoSlowGoFar View Post
    Do these ski long or can they be pivoty like some other reverse cambered skis?
    I have the BMT 109... they feel true to length when edged hard but can do the buttwiggle pretty easily... expecting the same here

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    $315 shipped. Can't go wrong. Fuck.

    10% off expires on Friday.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    I have the BMT 109... they feel true to length when edged hard but can do the buttwiggle pretty easily... expecting the same here

    Yeah, you'll get that exactly. When I had these skis my takeaway was that if I was ever relegated to one single pair of skis for touring (god forbid) these would be the skis. Good on hard snow, but not a fan of full rocker there. Kind of remarkably good for 94mm in powder. Never felt overwhelmed up to 12"+ of even wind affected snow.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    Still a bunch more of these for the taking.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    Great skis. I am used to touring 105-110 skis as my spring ski, bought these on a whim a year or two ago (same place, also on the cheap).

    These things are light (like 1550 in a 186) and ski shit snow surprisingly well. I bought them to be able to edge steep firm conditions easily and break the tails free with a heel flick. Does both. Very poppy when you start arcing them, making skiing firm quite enjoyable. I end up skiing on these much faster than I would have thought from the weight and shape

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    bump ...

    different impulse buy = flipping a pair of these.
    if anyone missed out I'll sell the pair I got for the same price I paid - $315 shipped.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    the gach
    Posts
    5,663
    Do these still have the only use marker bindings or you’ll die warning?
    But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Chugachjed View Post
    Do these still have the only use marker bindings or you’ll die warning?
    Not sure. I planned to mount Vipecs.

    (Also, potentially a few extra $ for shipping to AK)

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    the gach
    Posts
    5,663

    PSA: Völkl BMT 94 (186 only) $350 shipped

    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    Not sure. I planned to mount Vipecs.

    (Also, potentially a few extra $ for shipping to AK)
    No doubt. They used to have a sticker on the top sheet that said only to use marker bindings.
    But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,601
    FWIW, I've been running Ions for the last 3 years on mine with no ill affects. 94's absolutely kick ass. Also FWIW, I've got mine mounted at -1 for a little extra love in 3D snow and would do it again. Still skis fine on firm as long as you stay on the front of them

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    I have skied these bmts without markers and they were fine-verts with epoxy. Truth is there is an H shaped metal reinforcement you can get the specs on which is the mounting reinforcement on the ski. As long as the screws mostly hit that you are fine.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Livingston, MT
    Posts
    1,793
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    bump ...

    different impulse buy = flipping a pair of these.
    if anyone missed out I'll sell the pair I got for the same price I paid - $315 shipped.
    You’re killing me. Must resist...


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    girdwood
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by hick View Post
    You’re killing me. Must resist...


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Do it. They’re sweet. Though I mounted mine at -1 and think I may move to the line.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    365
    I have those in 176 and they’re great for spring but I wish I had put some race binding on them instead of the ions ... Now I’m not sure it’s possible / advisable to switch binding because of the « H » plate and hole conflicts ...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    I have those in 176 and they’re great for spring but I wish I had put some race binding on them instead of the ions ... Now I’m not sure it’s possible / advisable to switch binding because of the « H » plate and hole conflicts ...
    I have SSL 2.0 on BMT 90s. Not really a “race” binding. But same H plate. Things are on there bomber.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by hick View Post
    You’re killing me. Must resist...


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Don't resist!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by rangerjake View Post
    I have SSL 2.0 on BMT 90s. Not really a “race” binding. But same H plate. Things are on there bomber.
    I hear you, I have some Raider 12 on my BMT 109 and no issues. But for the 94, switching from the ion to an ATK seems a bit borderline, there would be less than 10mm between the old and new holes, so I prefer not to do it.

    That’s why I don’t use my BMT 94 much since with ion they weight the same as my BMT 109 with Raider.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    $teaux
    Posts
    1,285
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    I hear you, I have some Raider 12 on my BMT 109 and no issues. But for the 94, switching from the ion to an ATK seems a bit borderline, there would be less than 10mm between the old and new holes, so I prefer not to do it.

    That’s why I don’t use my BMT 94 much since with ion they weight the same as my BMT 109 with Raider.
    Ah, nvm, didn’t catch the hole conflict part of that. Narrower mount platforms I don’t think are a huge deal, but hole conflicts matter regardless of the ski.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •