Page 20 of 239 FirstFirst ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 5956
  1. #476
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,282
    ^ & the ‘admission width’ for being a Moment consumer is 98mm. The Commander 98 is a solid ride, but most intermediate/advancing skiers don’t want to work a ski that hard to ski the groomers & unfortunately that’s a ton of the market. FWIW - my Jaguar Sharks are one of my favorite skis when I’m not plotting to be in the trees/bumps.

  2. #477
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    mammoth
    Posts
    277
    That's interesting. For me, that's one of the last things I look for in a ski because I haven't found a ski with traditional sidecut that you can't carve up groomers on. That's one reason I ended up on my 116mm Bibbys... they can rip groomers pretty damn well. Does it carve like a GS ski? Of course not. But to me, groomers are mostly for a fun, quick, and leisurely run down to the lift... and pretty much any ski with traditional sidecut will do that for me.

    Different strokes of course, I don't aspire to be a racer... but it makes me wonder how many people who are only in it for a leisurely day on the mountain actually benefit from skinny skis.

    And tangentially... same with teaching beginners on cambered skis. I don't see why people aren't learning on flat bases or even slight reverse camber. It'd make catching an edge way less common and make it easier for them break out the tails and learn the muscle memory for a skate stop.

  3. #478
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    da hood
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    ^ & the ‘admission width’ for being a Moment consumer is 98mm. The Commander 98 is a solid ride, but most intermediate/advancing skiers don’t want to work a ski that hard to ski the groomers & unfortunately that’s a ton of the market. FWIW - my Jaguar Sharks are one of my favorite skis when I’m not plotting to be in the trees/bumps.
    Plenty of skis coming out of China and Austria fit what those people are looking for. An easy going east coast groomer ski doesn’t seem to fit with Moment’s current philosophy, and most of us are very thankful for that.

    Btw, it appears Moment had a record sales year with most skis selling out.

  4. #479
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,963

    Moment Skis Discussion

    There have been multiple industry blog type internet posts pushing for narrow skis this year, setting the marketing stage for spring sales and sales for 19/20. It appears that some of the ski companies in coordination with some retailers (most specifically REI) are gonna push to sell skus for skis narrower than 90mm underfoot. Several of the posts are alluding to a “you’re doing wrong” tone, directed towards customers. Some ski companies have even stated that they are pushing on narrower skis this season and maybe next and will then push the pendulum back to wider skis....

  5. #480
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    523

    Moment Skis Discussion

    Debating on whether to get a Wildcat Tour or a Wildcat 108 Tour. Already have a shit snow touring setup so this is more of a middle of winter touring setup. Anyone skied both and can elaborate more on the difference?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by PNW_Skier206; 03-24-2019 at 09:04 PM.

  6. #481
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    20
    I got the 190 DW this year, skiing interior BC/Colorado. Love' em, hold up awesome is almost all terrain, and carve really nice once I'm up to speed

  7. #482
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Evergreen Co
    Posts
    969
    If your thinking 'non shit snow' I don't see a lot of downsides to the regular Wildcat unless the weight really matters.

    The 108 is a little lighter and will likely be 'very slightly' better in some snow conditions but worse in the soft stuff. The regular wildcat tour is already plenty light in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by PNW_Skier206 View Post
    Debating on whether to get a Wildcat Tour or a Wildcat 108 Tour. Already have a shit snow touring setup so this is more of a middle of winter touring setup. Anyone skied both and can elaborate more on the difference?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #483
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailwind View Post
    If your thinking 'non shit snow' I don't see a lot of downsides to the regular Wildcat unless the weight really matters.

    The 108 is a little lighter and will likely be 'very slightly' better in some snow conditions but worse in the soft stuff. The regular wildcat tour is already plenty light in my opinion.
    Bibby tour (std wildcat tour) is incredibly good at skiing firm snow. I doubt the 108 is significantly better. I bet the 116 is significantly better in pow
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  9. #484
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    523
    That’s what I’m thinking. It would be < 5000 vert days so like 100-200 grams doesn’t matter that much


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #485
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by PNW_Skier206 View Post
    That’s what I’m thinking. It would be < 5000 vert days so like 100-200 grams doesn’t matter that much


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Just to echo what was said, I own the 108 Tour but have never skied a full width Cat. I fucking love the 108 tour as a one ski quiver for touring and they’re a strong choice for a narrower travel ski.

    That said, I think the 108, like most 108 skis, is a very good one ski quiver for softer snow conditions but not a great pow ski if you weigh more than a typical 15 year old girl. I think the biggest casualty of going wider is probably tight runs (trees and couloirs), not weight but I don’t really know.

  11. #486
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,620
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    There have been multiple industry blog type internet posts pushing for narrow skis this year, setting the marketing stage for spring sales and sales for 19/20. It appears that some of the ski companies in coordination with some retailers (most specifically REI) are gonna push to sell skus for skis narrower than 90mm underfoot. Several of the posts are alluding to a “you’re doing wrong” tone, directed towards customers. Some ski companies have even stated that they are pushing on narrower skis this season and maybe next and will then push the pendulum back to wider skis....
    Yep - gotta hype it one way or the other to keep moving product. And I *hate* that tone you're referring to, it bugs the shit out of me.

  12. #487
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Yep - gotta hype it one way or the other to keep moving product. And I *hate* that tone you're referring to, it bugs the shit out of me.
    Word. Love it when you get comments on the lift w the same tone. Yet somehow it's never the guys on 'race room gs skis' skiing faster than me or my buddies...

    Also x3 on getting the full on wildcat tour. Soft snow performance is worth the grams

  13. #488
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    P-tex, CA
    Posts
    8,660
    Moment dominated as THE snowblade manufacturer for the Pain McShlonkey at Squaw on Saturday.

  14. #489
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    Also x3 on getting the full on wildcat tour. Soft snow performance is worth the grams
    Per Moment's website:

    W108 Tour in 190: 3.54 kg
    W Tour in 190: 3.65 kg

    Melee, is that right?? Seems odd that a ski ~10% smaller only weighs 3% less. Also, the W108 Tour copy says "The 108 version comes in at ten millimeters skinnier and almost a full pound lighter than its wider counterpart"

    I am considering a W108 Tour for an everyday touring stick, but that weight differential has me curious.

    Anyone have a review of the W108 Tour???
    Last edited by meter-man; 03-25-2019 at 11:16 PM. Reason: add website copy; review query
    sproing!

  15. #490
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    507
    Quote Originally Posted by WhetherMan View Post
    Rad.

    I hear he only has eyes for Ryan Gosling, but by all means, lay on the charm and get a pair! I begged and pleaded with one of the moment guys, but sounded like no-go this year for mere mortals such as myself

    My biggest complaint about the govy is the lack of energy in the ski. Probably contributes to it's excellent stability, but from my brief experience on the Commander 98, that construction will provide a lot more life.
    Yep, stoked.
    Hmm, I think the Govy has good amount of energy for being as wide as it is. Certainly more than a BG. Just need to load up that tail, takes a bit of speed or some mass.

  16. #491
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Just gonna throw this out there.

    WTB: longest Deathwish they make.


  17. #492
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,620
    Okay, so loooooong time coming but just ordered my first pair of Moments... some Wildcat 108's. Mount them on the line? I'm generally a directional skier but I don't mind a healthy dose of tail rocker, so long as I can still drive the front of the skis. For perspective, my pow skis are Black Crows Nocta's and they're relatively forward mounted and I ski them on the line.

  18. #493
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Okay, so loooooong time coming but just ordered my first pair of Moments... some Wildcat 108's. Mount them on the line? I'm generally a directional skier but I don't mind a healthy dose of tail rocker, so long as I can still drive the front of the skis. For perspective, my pow skis are Black Crows Nocta's and they're relatively forward mounted and I ski them on the line.
    You get them at 184 or 190? I haven’t skied the 108s (not many people have) but I’ve skied OG Bibby’s in both 184 and 190 on the line and at +1 and I’ve always liked best on the line. Don’t think moving forward makes sense unless you spin and land switch and ton since they are already pretty quick as long as you have even a little speed.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #494
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,620
    Quote Originally Posted by PNW_Skier206 View Post
    You get them at 184 or 190? I haven’t skied the 108s (not many people have) but I’ve skied OG Bibby’s in both 184 and 190 on the line and at +1 and I’ve always liked best on the line. Don’t think moving forward makes sense unless you spin and land switch and ton since they are already pretty quick as long as you have even a little speed.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Got them in 184 so they’re a bit shorter for trees and bumps or whatever. My Noctas are 190. And yeah, if anything I’m wondering if I should mount behind the line, definitely not in front.
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

  20. #495
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    J - I skied some demo 108's in 190 and played around with the boot center. On the line was dialed. You can drive the tips old school style or ski neutral at that point - respond well to both

  21. #496
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,620
    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    J - I skied some demo 108's in 190 and played around with the boot center. On the line was dialed. You can drive the tips old school style or ski neutral at that point - respond well to both
    Thanks for that. More often than not I prefer to mount on the line as intended.
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

  22. #497
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    mammoth
    Posts
    277
    I mounted my OG Bibby's on the line and they ski just like sruffian says. Easy to drive the tips like a directional ski but they also work well in a more neutral body position. I think one of the greatest strengths of this ski is that it really lends itself to different skiing styles at the recommended line, which helps make it such a versatile ski. Just stay out of the backseat lol.

  23. #498
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,317
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    Per Moment's website:

    W108 Tour in 190: 3.54 kg
    W Tour in 190: 3.65 kg

    Melee, is that right?? Seems odd that a ski ~10% smaller only weighs 3% less. Also, the W108 Tour copy says "The 108 version comes in at ten millimeters skinnier and almost a full pound lighter than its wider counterpart"

    I am considering a W108 Tour for an everyday touring stick, but that weight differential has me curious.

    Anyone have a review of the W108 Tour???
    Been putting a lot of thought into this too, here's where Im at:

    I have Bibby Tour 190s mounted with shifts as my deep snow or short tour ski. Are they kind of heavy? Yeah. Do I care? No. They are still way lighter inbounds bibby 190s mounted with pivot 18s, and Im a bigger dude so am able to carry the weight around. Ive done about 2000 -2500 vert days on these and havent felt worn out.

    For longer tours, spring etc.., I would love to just ski the Bibby's but have them be lighter. Also would be nice to have them narrower for skin track and maneuvarability. They so freaking versatile and I feel so comfortable on them, I dont want to adjust to any other type of ski at this point. So I've decided on getting the Wildcat Tour 108 and mount them with some Zeds that I have.

    Bibby Tour 190 + Shift: 1925 grams + 885 grams = 2810 grams

    Wildcat 108 Tour 190 + Zed= 1770 grams +375 grams = 2145 grams

    When you consider the weight of the whole combo, thats a savings 665 grams per foot, about 1.5 pounds per foot. Thats a fucking SOLID two ski touring quiver right there.

  24. #499
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Norcal
    Posts
    412
    Jay mount them on the line. I mounted my tours +1 of line and like them better than -1 back of line.

  25. #500
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,620
    Quote Originally Posted by roverdoc View Post
    Jay mount them on the line. I mounted my tours +1 of line and like them better than -1 back of line.
    Will do, especially since you know how I ski...
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •