Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 190

Thread: Shift fail or ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286

    Exclamation Shift fail or ?

    Ok here goes the 2019 iriponsnow public flogging:

    I took 2 mellow runs with my new Shifts & managed to pull the housing off the hardware. Posting as I think it’s a possible safety issue related to ski flex allowing this to occur.

    I’ve shared w a few select industry folks & got a real unimpressive “it’s either a flawed mount or YOU did something wrong abusing the gear.”

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D7AAECE4-573B-4E70-B2F2-A84311920D15.jpg 
Views:	459 
Size:	397.6 KB 
ID:	260945

    The mount looks legit & was done via a reputable shop.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Shop fucked up. Take the toe off entirely and show us the mount. But 99% sure the shop boned the install


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,358
    Certainly looks like a bad mount. What makes you think otherwise?

    Sent from my Pixel using TGR Forums mobile app

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8FEAEC3C-9977-46B2-B290-44BA1AF79A75.jpg 
Views:	435 
Size:	615.2 KB 
ID:	260948

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Certainly looks like a bad mount. What makes you think otherwise?

    Sent from my Pixel using TGR Forums mobile app
    Yah. OP take off the toe and measure from each set of holes to the next. We'll all then compare that to the actual mount pattern. Below is the shift toe mount pattern


    1

    2 3

    4 5


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Certainly looks like a bad mount. What makes you think otherwise?

    Sent from my Pixel using TGR Forums mobile app
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A20A3B42-2CD1-45A1-BF97-2BAB050E93A8.jpg 
Views:	405 
Size:	501.4 KB 
ID:	260950

    When the housing is on the hardware, the unit is snug & the Dremel bit here is in the mount hole. It’s as far back as it can possibly go.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    My best available measurement
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8AD835A7-88D2-444A-9EB3-770BE944662F.jpg 
Views:	393 
Size:	805.1 KB 
ID:	260951

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    1 to 2/3 = 2.5 inches

    2/3 to 4/5 = 2 &7/8th

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    2,965
    This is interesting, I still think that there is A LOT of stress on those front 3 screws. If your mount is not dialed I bet there will be more pullouts. I wish those back 2 hidden screws contributed to a more solid mount. Once again speculating here. How much flex is there in those skis?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,257
    in your first photo, it appears that the toe screw (#1) got pulled out during a flex

    did the fastener pull thru the binding plastic?

    i'm not following the hole spacing/pattern check...doesn't seem relevant? (i'm just a dentist)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    2,965
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    My best available measurement
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8AD835A7-88D2-444A-9EB3-770BE944662F.jpg 
Views:	393 
Size:	805.1 KB 
ID:	260951
    Can you print the shift template on the Official Shift Thread and overlay it?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    2,965
    Quote Originally Posted by acinpdx View Post
    in your first photo, it appears that the toe screw (#1) got pulled out during a flex

    did the fastener pull thru the binding plastic?

    i'm not following the hole spacing/pattern check...doesn't seem relevant? (i'm just a dentist)
    The part of the shift that interfaces with the front nubbin's is metal. However if they mounted the front screw too far back it would not have been fully locked in.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Photo of bottom of toe piece?
    Particularly the area that slides over front post(#1)

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,257
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    The part of the shift that interfaces with the front nubbin's is metal. However if they mounted the front screw too far back it would not have been fully locked in.
    gotcha, thx

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8384B281-6D47-4223-A65A-73B9F74BD6E4.jpg 
Views:	346 
Size:	382.0 KB 
ID:	260953
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Photo of bottom of toe piece?
    Particularly the area that slides over front post(#1)

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    Can you print the shift template on the Official Shift Thread and overlay it?
    Perhaps tomorrow

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    This is interesting, I still think that there is A LOT of stress on those front 3 screws. If your mount is not dialed I bet there will be more pullouts. I wish those back 2 hidden screws contributed to a more solid mount. Once again speculating here. How much flex is there in those skis?

    There’s a TON of flex in the WhiteDot R98’s

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    If you flex the ski enough, the binding housing would slip off the little nubbin.

    It seems like you'd have to flex the ski a shit tonne, but would think it's possible with that design.

    A bottom plate with a longer slot to recieved the nubbin could be a relatively cheap and easy fix for Salomon, if that's the case.

    Another solution might be to make a nubbin with an oval shape with the longest axis of the oval perpendicular to the ski length. Turn binding 90 degrees, slip over oval nubbin, rotate back 90 degrees, pull binding backward on the ski and screw down the other screws. Then when the ski flexed, the wider part of the oval nubbin wouldn't actually even be able to come out of the hole in the metal bottom plate hole. Probably even cheaper for Salomon, if that's the case.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	035D7D1E-DAD1-4BFD-9C9C-16F4B39DDCB4.jpg 
Views:	446 
Size:	517.5 KB 
ID:	260958

    It’s not loose...... best angle I can get here to line em up.

    It’s also been suggested that the drill clutch caught early & failed to allow screws 2/3 to fully go in. I guess that’s possible- yet I think it would have to be super lose & something I completely missed on pre ski inspection.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    124
    I did maybe 30 days on on Shifts over the southern season, and have had no problems. Having said that, I use epoxied inserts and stiff-ish skis.

    I wish the toe piece interface was simple like that of the heel - you need 3 types of screws and a moderate amount of fucking around to change toe pieces.

    Overlay comparison will be interesting. Curious to see if this can be replicated.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,257
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	035D7D1E-DAD1-4BFD-9C9C-16F4B39DDCB4.jpg 
Views:	446 
Size:	517.5 KB 
ID:	260958

    It’s not loose...... best angle I can get here to line em up.

    It’s also been suggested that the drill clutch caught early & failed to allow screws 2/3 to fully go in. I guess that’s possible- yet I think it would have to be super lose & something I completely missed on pre ski inspection.

    it looks like screws 2 & 3 got pulled off axis towards the front during the release...the holes appear to be dented/elongated towards the front

    that slot length doesn't look all that long at all

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Quote Originally Posted by acinpdx View Post

    that slot length doesn't look all that long at all
    Thanks my thinking here. Now the ski is softer & my boot is only a 24, so I can get considerable flex out of the system.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    If it is the ski flexing and the nubbin slipping out of the slot, then the next two screw would rip out pretty easily. And for the ski to flex enough to do that, the other two screws would be pulled out at a forward angle towards the tip of the ski.

    However, the only way I could see there being enough flex would be if some kind of transverse wave of shock went through the ski, like if you hit the tip head on into a tree, causing a rippling wave toward the binding.

    Not saying it was the nubbin, the slot, or a transverse ripple shock through the ski, just wildly speculating. Obviously.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    Thanks my thinking here. Now the ski is softer & my boot is only a 24, so I can get considerable flex out of the system.
    Can you go put your boot in the good binding on the other ski and do a big flex test to see if there's binding lift as the ski flexes/arcs against it?
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,286
    Quote Originally Posted by reckless toboggan View Post
    Can you go put your boot in the good binding on the other ski and do a big flex test to see if there's binding lift as the ski flexes/arcs against it?
    This is TGR meets the ScienceGuy:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4B9FC028-E98D-42C1-AD5C-AA4E54DA55D3.jpg 
Views:	280 
Size:	535.4 KB 
ID:	260960

    When I hand flex the good ski with the boot in & place a wad of play dough in front of the binding, you can see a good amount of forward motion into the play dough & this is simply hand flexing.

    Thoughts?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •