Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 293
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,350
    Considering 183 Corvus (non-freebird) for lift assisted eurotouring. Typically make my trip in late March, so any and all conditions will be present. Anyone ski these much on steep hard snow?

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using TGR Forums mobile app

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,576
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    First day on the 193s after trading my 188s with Cascade Luke. Very happy, just as nimble but these go to eleven. They seem more than 5 cm longer. Track through stiff wind affected snow really well.
    Love it. Yea the 193s were skiable for me and they beg to rage. If my home Mtn catered more to zooming or I was MagUni’s size I’d keep. Turns out I’m a better skier in tighter/steeper terrain on 188s. 6’ 195

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Considering 183 Corvus (non-freebird) for lift assisted eurotouring. Typically make my trip in late March, so any and all conditions will be present. Anyone ski these much on steep hard snow?

    Sent from my Pixel 3a using TGR Forums mobile app
    Nothing with exposure, but they do have great edge hold on the steeper hard snow I’ve been on.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,238
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Considering 183 Corvus (non-freebird) for lift assisted eurotouring. Typically make my trip in late March, so any and all conditions will be present. Anyone ski these much on steep hard snow?
    i have older non-freebird 193's (2018, front rocker + camber) set up with dynafit rad ft 2.0
    the skis have no problem with hard conditions...just use the binders you trust the best

    i'll let someone on the new version comment on edge hold of those

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,350
    Follow up question: Is it possible to generate energy/rebound from the tail on short turns? The complete lack of pop was my gripe with the OG Cochise. The new Cochise and Zero G 108's are better, but they have a bit of camber. Not looking for a slalom ski that will launch me out of a turn, obviously, but just a bit of rebound can save a lot of energy in long firm couloirs when you need to a make a whole bunch of turns. You might call it making "assisted jump turns."

    Edit to add:

    I'm also considering the Corvus Freebird (but put off by all the camber- am I wrong), QST 106's (liked, but didn't love last years version, but they actually fit where I ski in Italy pretty well, as opposed to CO where I'd prefer something burlier at that width) and some Zero G 105's (haven't ruled out a more uphill-focused ski).

    Any comparisons welcome.

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219

    2019 Black Crows Corvus....bueller?

    They have a lot of effective edge. I posted a video above, of a euro dude skiing an icy glacier on them, which looks promising. He base jumps at the end, so I guess that could imply that you might want to wear a parachute with them. For reference, a 191 Kartel, which is about 5cm longer on a straight pull, has about 5cm less effective edge than the 188 Corvus.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    I feel like the Corvus gives you rebound if you’re on the edge or when loading up the ski in softer snow. They’re pretty stiff and I’m heavy so your mileage may vary.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    Hard to answer the question about couloir skiing - are you talking about doing hop turns where you want to be travelling very slowly/carefully? Or somewhere you're able to generate speed and actually ski?

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,350
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    Hard to answer the question about couloir skiing - are you talking about doing hop turns where you want to be travelling very slowly/carefully? Or somewhere you're able to generate speed and actually ski?
    I'm talking about somewhere in the middle. Linked-hop turns if you will, where most of the turn happens in the air, but you're also using the energy from the previous turn to pop you into the next one. You can also slide a bit to load up the tail before making the hop turn. Does that make sense?

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    I've only found myself skiing terrian like that a handful of times, but I thought the Corvus had more than enough energy/pop to make easy/fun work of that terrain. Of course they only get better the more you can open them up and pickup speed.

    Being a relatively light 2k(ish) grams really helps too. Although I'm used to much heavier skis - to someone used to lighter stuff these could feel like planks.

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219
    My 2019 188 Corvuses are 2200g. I think I got a pair from the heavy batch. With CAST and FKS 155s, as a pair they only weigh 30g less than my 191cm Billygoats.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    I didn’t realize they had such variability in weight. If I remember right mine are 2070g.

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,219
    I think Luke’s are lighter, too, around 2000g.

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    I’ve never weighed any of my skis.

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,576
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    I’ve never weighed any of my skis.
    Your / my old 193s are 2190 & 2186
    Pretty close delta these days. Most 188s I’ve seen more like 2050

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    They, 188s too, don’t seem very heavy.

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,958
    My 188's were 2050 on the money

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by smooth operator View Post
    What do you expect from this ski that the QST99 cant deliver? I know some guys who like the QST99 (or 106) for its wide range of applications. Seems like it should do what you want?
    Sold the QST's because I wanted to go a bit wider underfoot. The only thing I didnt like about the QST's was that I felt like I got a lot of chatter on groomers. Rode the Boundary Pro's two days ago at Squaw and LOVED them but still considering these and pulling the trigger as soon as I can make a decision.

    At what point does wight come into effect ofer height? I've been a split boarder for years and trying to learn this whole "ski" thing still.

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    124
    I'm now a member of the club. I've never been on a ski that combines very good speed and stability with the ease to pivot. Found my new daily driver.

    My Atris can collect some dust for a while.

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    507
    Can anyone compare the 188 or 193 to the 194 Devastator? From the rocker pics, it looks like the Corvus is much flatter with less rocker, but the Dev has a longer radius. Curious as to how much more stable the Corvus is (which is my assumption).

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,777
    Does anyone have rocker pics of 2021 Corvus Freebird?
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevada29er View Post
    Can anyone compare the 188 or 193 to the 194 Devastator? From the rocker pics, it looks like the Corvus is much flatter with less rocker, but the Dev has a longer radius. Curious as to how much more stable the Corvus is (which is my assumption).
    I wouldn’t get hung up on the turn radius, almost identical dimensions as my invictus(26m) and looking at them side by side the Corvus looks straighter.

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    IS the consensus to size up or down?
    I usually ride the ~185 version of most ski's (185 OG Cochise, 186 OG bodacious, 186 Gunsmoke, 184 VW katana). Should I go for a 183 or 188 Corvus?
    I am 5'9 150lbs.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,723
    I think you’ll be fine on either. Pick the length for the purpose. Are you billy goating around or are you charging around in deeper and/or funky snow?

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevada29er View Post
    Can anyone compare the 188 or 193 to the 194 Devastator? From the rocker pics, it looks like the Corvus is much flatter with less rocker, but the Dev has a longer radius. Curious as to how much more stable the Corvus is (which is my assumption).
    Compared to the super heavy 2nd year 194 Dev the Corvus is lighter, snappier, and more "fun" on a wide variety of terrain. The Corvus does have less rocker, but floats way better than the Dev. The Dev was more stable at very high speeds and more of a big mtn killer than the Corvus. But that's just in reference to the 2600g original Dev reviewed here: https://blisterreview.com/gear-revie...rnt-devastator If you're asking about the lighter, later model of the Dev I'm not sure how they compare.
    Last edited by kathleenturneroverdrive; 02-10-2020 at 11:18 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •