Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Results 251 to 268 of 268
  1. #251
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    880
    Iím also pretty stoked with the mtnís. Several big days, great function. They feel solid. Inly gripes are the silly plastic clips for ski crampon use, must improve. Also, ramp angle calls for a tiny toe shim.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  2. #252
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    880
    185, 5í11Ē, menís spring.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  3. #253
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    1,584
    Quote Originally Posted by riff View Post
    Iím also pretty stoked with the mtnís. Several big days, great function. They feel solid. Inly gripes are the silly plastic clips for ski crampon use, must improve. Also, ramp angle calls for a tiny toe shim.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Ramp angle is what pushed me to alpinist but a small shim would easily help.

  4. #254
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    2,846
    So I keep asking myself why I haven't considered the Plum Pika. It looks to be a flippy lifter evolution of the Guide. Ramp angle is easily correctable with toe shims.

    Interestingly, the "Binding Finder" dialog on the Plum site directs me to the Guides. Maybe they know something I don't

    [edit] so I called up skimo.co today and the guy I spoke with was so "blonde" in his explanation of the differences between the two that I almost hung up on him. They'll still likely get my business 'coz they do yeoman's work with the resources on their website. I can't hold one lame employee against them.

    [edit 2] The Pika has only 1 riser position.

    [edit 3] the delta on the Pika is "better". After adding a 9-10 mm toe shim to the Guide, its stack height will still be a few mm lower than a Vipec.

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 04-19-2019 at 10:18 AM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  5. #255
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    497
    I've skied Raider 12s with the toe adjusting plate for 10-ish days this year. Really like how they ski compared to Ions, probably because a bit lower stack and less ramp. And they weigh a bit less. And no icing so far.

    However; according to the skimo-chart the RT 2.0 is lighter and have the ramp I'm looking for - without shimming. And even lower stack.

    What's the difference between the Raider 12 and the RT 2.0?
    It seems like the RT has the same toe, but a less complicated / lower heel? On ATKs website it says the RT is sold with the R01 plate. Is the measurements on skimo with or without the plate?

  6. #256
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    2,846
    So at the end of the day, I got nervous and took the safe route with a pair of Plum Guide 12's. I shimmed the toes with some UHMW (a touch under 5/16" which netted out to 8.25mm).

    This puts the delta at 1mm less/better than my Vipecs (11mm for the Vipecs and 10mm for the Guides), with the stack height being about 3mm less than the Vipecs which feel fine to me.

    Stay tuned for how they ski, although the skis they're mounted to (Praxis EXPs) are so different from anything else I own that I doubt I'll be able to say anything definitive.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  7. #257
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    880
    Any decent mods out there to ditch the little plastic clips for Salomon Mtn ski crampons? They are fiddly and make a hassle out of something that should be simple.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  8. #258
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by riff View Post
    Any decent mods out there to ditch the little plastic clips for Salomon Mtn ski crampons? They are fiddly and make a hassle out of something that should be simple.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I looked and tried also but couldn't find any. Posting just in case anyone found some

  9. #259
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    2,517
    I wonder why they are needed?

    Sent from my Armor_3 using Tapatalk

  10. #260
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    880
    It keeps the crampon centered so it doesnít catch on the edge of the toe piece. Dynafit has a plastic tab built in that works great and canít fall off, get lost or require dexterity.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  11. #261
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    5,460
    I can't picture it. Is this for the Salomon brand ski crampon? I haven't seen them. I've been using the plum crampon with my MTN's and really like them, I like that they can be dropped in without having to slide in from the side, I think it makes it easier to put them on/off without getting out of the skis.

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    880
    Iíve got dynafit cramps, and I guess I havenít tried going without it. Maybe I donít even need them....


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  13. #263
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    5,460
    Quote Originally Posted by riff View Post
    I’ve got dynafit cramps, and I guess I haven’t tried going without it. Maybe I don’t even need them....


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Ah, that little plastic piece that comes with the binding? Yeah, I've never used that with either plum or dynafit crampons, never had an issue.

    From Skimo.co: Note: This binding accepts both Plum and Dynafit crampons, though with the latter the included crampon keeper clip must be used to prevent any lateral movement during use.

  14. #264
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Sugarhouse
    Posts
    40
    What are your thoughts on the new Hagan Pure 10 @ 280g? I'm really liking the Core 12's right now, and these seem like a nice way to shave off a little bit more weight.

    https://www.haganskimountaineering.c...ure-10-binding

  15. #265
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    513
    The Hagan site says that theyíre rebranded atk Crests, which were discussed some earlier in this thread. Itís confusing enough that ATK has a dozen-plus models of bindings; I wish BD and Hagan didnít randomly cherry-pick models and rebrand them.

  16. #266
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    2,846
    Quote Originally Posted by jorion View Post
    The Hagan site says that theyíre rebranded atk Crests, which were discussed some earlier in this thread. Itís confusing enough that ATK has a dozen-plus models of bindings; I wish BD and Hagan didnít randomly cherry-pick models and rebrand them.
    At least Hagan tells you which ATK model they're selling, although renaming it doesn't seem to make any sense.

    BD leaves it to you to figure it out. Silly branding exercise.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  17. #267
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    11,244
    Quote Originally Posted by riff View Post
    Iíve got dynafit cramps, and I guess I havenít tried going without it. Maybe I donít even need them....


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    It'll work till it doesn't. If you're kickturning aggressively or sidehilling through lumpy terrain ( eg refrozen debris) the ski crampon can get moved laterally. Then if you're not careful and step down one side of the crampon will get levered and it will break


    ISO one 90mm and one 110mm Dynafit crampon to pair with other lonely crampons

  18. #268
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    mammoth
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by sf View Post
    I've skied Raider 12s with the toe adjusting plate for 10-ish days this year. Really like how they ski compared to Ions, probably because a bit lower stack and less ramp. And they weigh a bit less. And no icing so far.

    However; according to the skimo-chart the RT 2.0 is lighter and have the ramp I'm looking for - without shimming. And even lower stack.

    What's the difference between the Raider 12 and the RT 2.0?
    It seems like the RT has the same toe, but a less complicated / lower heel? On ATKs website it says the RT is sold with the R01 plate. Is the measurements on skimo with or without the plate?
    I'm curious about this too.

    Also what's everyone's take on the G3 Zed vs Raider 12? Lookin like they're pretty similar but can't decide which would fit my needs better. Raider = harsher ride, but better power transfer?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •