Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 338
  1. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Den/Baltimore
    Posts
    4,801
    Quote Originally Posted by whyturn View Post
    But I get the expense side.
    Don't you have like 10 pairs of pow skis, though?
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    www.instagram.com/auvgeek/

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    16,735
    Going narrow on your snows really helps with directional stability, not dragging if you are crossing lanes in the slush, and generally keeping rubber on the asphalt. Huge difference in positive control. Especially helpful if you upsize your summer tires for off road.

    4runner with 275 section width at (265 stock) but 245 snows! Subaru 225 stock and 215 snows! Huge performance gains to be had...
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Den/Baltimore
    Posts
    4,801
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Going narrow on your snows really helps with directional stability, not dragging if you are crossing lanes in the slush, and generally keeping rubber on the asphalt. Huge difference in positive control. Especially helpful if you upsize your summer tires for off road.

    4runner with 275 section width at (265 stock) but 245 snows! Subaru 225 stock and 215 snows! Huge performance gains to be had...
    Yeah.

    It's really too bad tire mfgs don't know that people would love to do that without downsizing the overall diameter. It's hard to find tires with an aspect ratio >65. I'd love to go 215/70 for the Outback -- gets you an extra half inch of GC over the 215/65, which matters in deep snow.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    www.instagram.com/auvgeek/

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,374
    Quote Originally Posted by whyturn View Post
    Problem is once you slide its too late.
    You need a new pit crew

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    6,091
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    M&S means all season tires, not snows. Better tread for snow than summer tires but don't have the soft rubber.
    Well exactly. That was my point. All-seasons are way better than summer tires in cold and snow, and I was making that distinction. At the change checkpoint heading up to Tahoe on 80 they definitely look for that logo.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    15,193
    Very very few people actually buy summer tires - sports cars and sport sedans/coupes, that's it. They're more expensive and wear faster than all seasons, and unless you are a driving enthusiast, you don't pick those for a daily driver.

    Which is why the comparisons between winter and summer tires are bullshit. And within the large world of all seasons, there are ones that will work pretty well in occasional snow (anything newer - with deeper tread - and in the touring or grand touring categories), and others that won't work so well (anything older - with low tread - and the ones more towards the performance end of AS tires, like UHP category, that may have more performance oriented rubber compounds that are harder in cold temperatures).

    This is also why pretty much any all terrain tire works pretty well on any AWD or 4WD SUV/ CUV/ truck, so long as it has deeper tread and reasonable siping. That's a perfectly decent vehicle + tire for winter use for those who see occasional snow, like driving up to ski from somewhere that is mostly dry (not covered in snow) in winter.

    True winter tires are definitely an improvement in snow. Whether they're worth it depends on the vehicle and where you are going to drive it regularly.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    4,415
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Tirerack has done a bit of testing. Here's all seasons vs winter
    https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=103

    Stopping distance from 30mph is 59ft on winters, 89ft on all seasons. That works out to coefficients of friction () of 0.34 and 0.51 respectively (actually they would need to be a bit higher to generate those stopping distances in the real world). A good summer tire on pavement can have a cf of 1.0 or more.

    Here's winter, a/s, and summer on an ice rink
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlYEMH10Z4s

    stopping distance from 10mph is 21ft on winters ( = 0.15), 39ft on all seasons ( = 0.08). Extrapolate to 30mph and you get stopping distances of 200 ft for winter tires, and 376ft on all seasons. That's a long ass way- over a football field to stop from 30mph. On dry pavement you can do that in like 35ft.

    What you might be able to take from that is that on snow, the winter tire has about 50% more grip. That means that from an accelerating and driving up a hill standpoint, in snow, an awd/4wd is going to have an advantage on the worse tires.

    On ice though, the winter tires have nearly twice the grip. The tread pattern and depth is irrelevant in this case and the extra grip from the winter tires comes mostly from the rubber compound itself, which is much softer. If you haven't handled a blizzak, it's worth wandering into a firestone store or something and shoving your thumb into the tread to feel how soft it is. That very soft rubber, plus the siping, allows the tread to deform and provide lots of very tiny biting edges as well as having a higher . I'm fairly certain that bridgestone even claims better traction on ice with blizzaks than the studded winterforce.

    Anyway, if you drive in snow on a regular basis I don't know why you would willfully choose to have 1/2 to 3/4 less traction. Once you have actually driven on snow tires you really won't want to be out on anything else.



    E: more data:
    https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=167
    https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...ce-data-page-3

    both generate in the ballpark of 0.15g stopping on ice, but only around 0.25 on snow.
    Boom.

    Please recall this post when discussing all-seasons vs snows, all ye tire jongs.
    PE, Mechanical Engineering

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    6,396

    Why your SUV sucks in the mountains

    I forgot there was even such a thing as summer tires.

    I dont even bother taking the blizzaks off for the 2 non snow months of july and august here lol
    skid luxury

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Tirerack has done a bit of testing. Here's all seasons vs winter
    https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=103

    Stopping distance from 30mph is 59ft on winters, 89ft on all seasons. That works out to coefficients of friction () of 0.34 and 0.51 respectively (actually they would need to be a bit higher to generate those stopping distances in the real world). A good summer tire on pavement can have a cf of 1.0 or more.

    Here's winter, a/s, and summer on an ice rink
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlYEMH10Z4s

    stopping distance from 10mph is 21ft on winters ( = 0.15), 39ft on all seasons ( = 0.08). Extrapolate to 30mph and you get stopping distances of 200 ft for winter tires, and 376ft on all seasons. That's a long ass way- over a football field to stop from 30mph. On dry pavement you can do that in like 35ft.

    What you might be able to take from that is that on snow, the winter tire has about 50% more grip. That means that from an accelerating and driving up a hill standpoint, in snow, an awd/4wd is going to have an advantage on the worse tires.

    On ice though, the winter tires have nearly twice the grip. The tread pattern and depth is irrelevant in this case and the extra grip from the winter tires comes mostly from the rubber compound itself, which is much softer. If you haven't handled a blizzak, it's worth wandering into a firestone store or something and shoving your thumb into the tread to feel how soft it is. That very soft rubber, plus the siping, allows the tread to deform and provide lots of very tiny biting edges as well as having a higher . I'm fairly certain that bridgestone even claims better traction on ice with blizzaks than the studded winterforce.

    Anyway, if you drive in snow on a regular basis I don't know why you would willfully choose to have 1/2 to 3/4 less traction. Once you have actually driven on snow tires you really won't want to be out on anything else.



    E: more data:
    https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=167
    https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...ce-data-page-3

    both generate in the ballpark of 0.15g stopping on ice, but only around 0.25 on snow.
    Best post in here. Thank you!

    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    M&S means all season tires, not snows. Better tread for snow than summer tires but don't have the soft rubber. True snows have the snowflake symbol. Good luck getting the guys checking tires to pick that out. Took me 10 minutes to find the symbol on my new X-Ices.

    Anyone old enough to have switched from old climbing shoes to sticky shoes knows the difference different kinds of rubber can make.
    M&S doesn't really mean shit. Tire companies are generally pretty responsible about the use of M&S but don't take it at face value. I have BFG KM2s on my jeep (they get the M&S designation) which actually have less traction than my daughters saucer sled on packed snow. I'm talking fucking scary how little traction they have. I'm pretty sure in the 10mph ice braking test Jamal linked above they simply wouldn't stop, ever.

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    6,091

    Why your SUV sucks in the mountains

    I love summer tires.
    In the summer.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    16,735
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    Best post in here. Thank you!



    M&S doesn't really mean shit. Tire companies are generally pretty responsible about the use of M&S but don't take it at face value. I have BFG KM2s on my jeep (they get the M&S designation) which actually have less traction than my daughters saucer sled on packed snow. I'm talking fucking scary how little traction they have. I'm pretty sure in the 10mph ice braking test Jamal linked above they simply wouldn't stop, ever.
    exactly X 2

    Kuhmo AT51 have the 3PMSF (3 peak mountain snowflake) and not good at all in the ice and mediocre in the snow. KO2s have 3PMSF are only slightly less shit (and don't listen to KO2 true believers who don't drive snows). Goodyear Wrangler SAs have the 3PMSF and are actually impressively good for a non-snow-tire, but no match for blizzak, particularly if there is ice or its cold.

    Real snow tires have super soft rubber compound and tons of sipping! Very good ones have either special compounds like blizzak, Michelin and Nokian studless that add extra ice grip over sipping that matches studs, or they have studs.
    Last edited by Summit; 11-27-2018 at 11:01 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    770
    Can we get a list of recommended snow tires by price (maybe one cheap, average, high). I have driven Cooper AT3s all over North America but yeah, I slide around.

    Other tips: sand bags over wheels really does make a difference.
    Buy used mount your own skis build a quiver

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    6,091
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    Can we get a list of recommended snow tires by price (maybe one cheap, average, high). I have driven Cooper AT3s all over North America but yeah, I slide around.

    Other tips: sand bags over wheels really does make a difference.
    just go to tire rack, etc.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,353
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    just go to tire rack, etc.
    Seriously. The prices are constantly changing. They differ by about $100 for the set between mid range and premium brands. There are coupons. Can this horse be beaten any longer?

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    770
    Kk well disagree but not surprised since subies are the most popular rigs around here


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Buy used mount your own skis build a quiver

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    1,211
    I would avoid the mystery cheapo imported brands like, say, saliun, ling long, triangle, etc, but aside from that just having ANY snow tire is going to be better than not. Tirerack and discount tire are probably the best online sources. I've been happy with the firestone down the street for a few things although my own tires came from tirerack's wholesale side.

    The thing I have noticed reading the tire tests is that while they will declare some specific tire "the best," when you look at the actual testing numbers like at the end of the car and driver article the differences are pretty small. Yet someone's going to see that and think that oh, Blizzaks are garbage now I need to buy Hakkas. But the stopping distance was the same on snow and less than 2ft different on ice and the nokians are significantly more expensive.

    I went with general altimax arctics because they were cheap, but well reviewed and general is a brand of continental and they're made in germany. It's "older tech," studdable (but I don't have studs) and I think shares a mold with a version of the i-pike and an older nokian. I've driven them back to back against blizzak ws80s, and there are some slight differences. Blizzak is better on smoother, slicker surfaces like that really hard packed snow you get on highways and ice. I've been in at least one situation where I wished for either blizzaks or studs, but made it where I was going without much issue. Have never seen so many cars and trucks in the ditches. In deeper, looser snow and slush I'd give the generals an advantage because of the bigger tread blocks and more open area.

    I think that translates well to the difference with an all season or light truck tire too. On ice the rubber compound (and siping) are most important, in snow the tread pattern and depth play a bigger role. It's also possible to add siping to your all seasons or truck tires which will make a difference because of those extra edges and more flex in the tread.

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    P-tex, CA
    Posts
    8,086
    I go through cars like coffee...I usually keep on the M&S that came with the car for a little while and then put on winter tires for the SUVs. For ages, I would do dedicated Summer tires from July - early November. On a big SUV, they really do make a difference is stability and handling. During winter/Spring, with three kids in the back of the car, I personally feel like its worth the time and expense for dedicated winter tires to know you have the best scenario when driving through a blizzard. However, it seems lately that a lot of the main tire shop franchises will not mount used tires...new ones, yes. I've had to go to the more mom & pop places to get it done. Buying an extra set of dedicated 21-22" SUV rims is an option but good quality ones can really set you back. The last couple sets of tires, I've just ran the winter tires through the summer and then reloaded with a new set in early November.

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Missoula DMV
    Posts
    322
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post

    The thing I have noticed reading the tire tests is that while they will declare some specific tire "the best," when you look at the actual testing numbers like at the end of the car and driver article the differences are pretty small. Yet someone's going to see that and think that oh, Blizzaks are garbage now I need to buy Hakkas. But the stopping distance was the same on snow and less than 2ft different on ice and the nokians are significantly more expensive.
    QFT. Blizzaks work great, but I switched to Dunlop winters last season and cannot tell the difference between them, even though the Blizzaks had the title of "best winter tire". Before that my only exposure to the Dunlop brand name had been through golf.

    YMMV, but definitely dig deeper into the tests/numbers when comparing. Helps to educate for future purchases.

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    9
    Probably important to note that the M+S designation on a tire is purely based on the geometry of the tread; it has nothing to do with any real testing of a tire's capability on snow and ice. The "snowflake in mountain" designation is for real winter tires. These have actually been tested for tire traction in snow.

    In my experience with my Subaru, I have used all season M+S tires that are supposed to be pretty decent in snow (Goodyear Tripletread, Michelin Defender). With real snow tires, even the cheapest brand, the difference is night and day, not even close. The different rubber compound is probably what makes the most difference.

    I find it interesting that people balk at the cost of extra winter tires when the cost to fix even the tiniest dent is more expensive than the priciest set of winter tires.

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    8
    We have Nokian Hakka 8s with studs (lots and lots of studs) on our AWD and they are amazing. The road to Apex climbs from 1200 feet to 5000 feet in 32 km. Much of the elevation gain is a series of hairpin switchbacks which means slowing right down, turning hard and then accelerating up a steep, slippery road. This is an excellent test because momentum is not an option. The 8's have now been superseded by Hakka 9s.

  21. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    on the banks of Fish Creek
    Posts
    322
    Name:  0A62AC00-FEB6-4D51-8C82-8182EBD48DE3.gif
Views: 212
Size:  47.6 KB

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    Very very few people actually buy summer tires - sports cars and sport sedans/coupes, that's it. They're more expensive and wear faster than all seasons, and unless you are a driving enthusiast, you don't pick those for a daily driver.
    Very few people ever select a tire meaningfully different than their OEM tires. On my MINI, I ran a dedicated summer tire and a dedicated winter tire, but mostly because I hated the OEM AS run-flats so much that I spent some real time researching my options.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  23. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,191
    Can we get some rad tire quiver pics in here?

  24. #99
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by hifno View Post
    I find it interesting that people balk at the cost of extra winter tires when the cost to fix even the tiniest dent is more expensive than the priciest set of winter tires.
    I find it interesting that people use nice, expensive cars as their mountain vehicles. Personally, i prefer driving my 15yr old 4runner with a cracked windshield and multiple nicks and dents on snowy mtn roads. If i stuff it into a snowbank, have another car give me a hard love tap, or catch a nice rock kicked up by a semi-truck, my car is meaningfully no worse for wear. Id be very gunshy of driving a nice $50k+ SUV or truck in winter conditions with all the other cars sliding around out there.

  25. #100
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3,644
    Yup.

    Keep a 4x4 manual SUV winter beater with upsized studded Hakkapeliittas and a ski box for those exact reasons.

    I don't understand people who buy $80,000 4x4 road princesses.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •