Results 51 to 75 of 79
Thread: Shift vs Tectons
-
11-17-2018, 09:00 PM #51Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2018
- Posts
- 33
I don't mind posting deals, just a newb to this forum so wasn't sure of the etiquette in posting them. I've been in some forums where I got lambasted for posting deals publicly. Apparently ruined it for some who were on the fence about a product and lost out because I posted the deal and others jumped on it.
Anyway, since it seems like it's not a big deal here, I got the Tectons off Barrabes. It currently has the 90mm for $450. Got it down to $400 with a 5% coupon for signing up for their newsletter and a pre-Black Friday coupon I was sent for having bought stuff with them before.
-
11-17-2018, 09:11 PM #52
Thanks for the explanation. Since Sport Conrad apparently no longer ships to the US, has anyone had experience with these folks?
I see their advertised price for Shifts is 371.89 Euros (before any discount).
... ThomGalibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
-
11-17-2018, 10:20 PM #53
Shift vs Tectons
Sure, I’m the same. So, used my shifts today and I literally couldn’t tell the difference from STH2’s on back to back runs. But the Tectons are damn close as well. But that’s why those are what I have and not any true tech heel bindings - that locked down heel is the big difference maker IMO, more so than toe elasticity. Although having at least a little helps.
I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.
-
11-17-2018, 11:37 PM #54Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2017
- Posts
- 2,305
MTNs will be a compromise in safety (due to release) and ride feel (due to lack of elasticity) compared to Tectons/Shifts. That is not to say MTNs are poor bindings - they are most def not.
So while I would not overpower MTNs, they + 1200gr ski as a system would have a much more jarring and easily overpowered feel mated with XTD 130s, than the same set up with say a TLT6, or say a 1600gr ski with Tectons. If i mount MTNs on that same 1600gr ski, they will still provide a more jarring ride than the Tectons, but be lighter on the up.
The point was i was trying to make was to think of bindings, skis and boots as a whole, not as individual parts. It was not that MTNs or ATKs suck - they do not and I was extremely impressed with the pair i owned (I've been singing MTNs + ATKs praises in other threads for being excellent light weight bindings). That being said, the more or less undebatable consensus is that they provide and will continue to provide a less smooth /more jarring ride everywhere compared to Tectons or Shifts (or Vipecs) except untouched fresh.
Of course, if all you ride is soft, fresh snow and you have legs of steel , MTNs and ATKs will be more than enough binding for all your touring needs The same will be true if you value / prioritize low weight over elasticity and toe release. At the end of the day it is all about picking your poison (be it weight, elasticity, perceived/actual safety, price, easy of use, walk modes, etc) and pick the bindings that fits your needs and priorities the best. There is no "best binding ever", but a number of very refined and amazing products that fit individuals better or worse. And if you also consider the snow you will be riding, how your boots, bindings and skis will interact, then you will be all the better for it
And if it isn't obvious, my opinions in this thread have been general in nature, not OP specific.
To the OP: Good to hear that you found a killer deal!
-
11-18-2018, 12:27 AM #55
-
11-18-2018, 12:31 AM #56
I always forget them. Thanks!
Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
-
11-18-2018, 09:51 AM #57
-
11-19-2018, 06:46 PM #58Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2018
- Posts
- 33
-
11-19-2018, 07:00 PM #59
SAFETY
I think one thing people don't consider (and I've only recently become aware of) is researching showing that the slotted Dynafit MasterStep toe fittings may actually increase release forces when used with MNC bindings whether the Shift, any of the frame bindings, or an alpine MNC like a Tyrolia Attack or Marker Jester. Why? Because the metal channels of the slot extend beyond the rest of the toe rand and it was demonstrated in testing to drag on the rollers in these MNC binding toes during release. That would likely negate any better safety from running lower lateral release settings d/t increased lateral elasticity on a Shift vs a Tecton if you own boots with these.
Originally Posted by blurred
-
11-20-2018, 10:21 AM #60
Any shop selling the Shift (or Warden 13/Warden 11) should be aware of this and will probably refuse to mount a boot with QuickStep inserts with those bindings, as per Amer Sports current guidelines. Marker, on the other hand, says QuickStep inserts are OK with SoleID bindings. Haven't heard anything from Tyrolia re: Attack 14 AT.
-
11-20-2018, 11:33 AM #61
-
11-20-2018, 12:13 PM #62Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,230
I have RS2’s and plan to mount with shifts so am interested in all this.
That said did someone discuss Amer and Scarpa working on an indemnity or some such clause or agreement?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-20-2018, 02:29 PM #63
Shifts are currently an official no-go for any master fit insert boots (Scarpa, Dynafit). Amer and Scarpa are in talks
New free ride Maestrale replacing the Freedom next year uses traditional inserts.
-
11-20-2018, 11:03 PM #64
You mean "QuickStep" inserts, as found in current Scarpa and Dynafit boots. "MasterStep" inserts (also not ISO 9523 according to Amer) are Dynafit only, and most of the current boots that come with them have no toe welt anyway so you'd have a hard time skiing downhill in any MNC binding. The Beast boots had MasterStep inserts as well.
-
11-21-2018, 09:24 PM #65
Something else that hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread is mount pattern. What a treat to have Fritschi keep the mount pattern the same between Vipec/Tecton and (hopefully) future versions and development down the line.
Having a few pairs of skis with Vipec inserts I was interested in getting a pair of Tectons... but then Shift.Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.
-
11-22-2018, 12:05 AM #66
As a result of this thread I spent 30 seconds with my angle grinder making my Quickstep fittings flush. All set now.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR ForumsGravity always wins...
-
11-22-2018, 07:50 AM #67Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,230
Have you mounted the shifts? If so did you bench test them before and after?
How about the pins? Did you try them before and after grinding them to make sure the pins still work the same?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
11-22-2018, 08:47 AM #68
-
11-22-2018, 11:25 AM #69
I don’t have shifts, but sometimes i ski a binding with toe wings. Figured why not.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR ForumsGravity always wins...
-
11-22-2018, 02:09 PM #70
-
11-22-2018, 02:16 PM #71Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2017
- Posts
- 2,305
I have Blacks.
quoted weight brakeless: https://blisterreview.com/gear-revie...schi-vipec-evo
When i think about it a bit more, I believe Blister is mistaken, as i pointed out below. As such, please ignore the 440gr number - it is more likely than not mistaken!
-
11-22-2018, 02:17 PM #72
-
11-22-2018, 02:21 PM #73
ZG have neither quick nor master step. They are standard dynafit tech fittings.
Sent from my VS995 using TGR Forums mobile appOriginally Posted by blurred
-
11-23-2018, 07:36 AM #74
-
11-23-2018, 09:02 AM #75
Bookmarks