Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Tech boot BSL

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169

    Tech boot BSL

    Is there a standard relationship across all boots/manufacturers between tech fitting spacing and "BSL". I have my paper template for my dynafits (thanks again bongora3) and I assume the BSL measurement is the conventional alpine BSL, not a special tech fitting BSL?

    How is the BSL measured on boots like the dynafit Hoji which aren't compatible with alpine bindings and don't have a conventional BSL?

    I know my tele bindings but this dark side stuff is mysterious.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    Are you concerned about running out of track adjustment range when switching between (say) a 26 Lange Freetour and a 25.5 Scarpa F1?

    Is your concern with the rearward offset of the toe pin cups from the front lip of the boot? Most boots are about 15mm, but this is just one more reason for a test mount. Some templates mark both the toe and the pin line. Still, do a test mount.

    Is your concern about finding the center of the boot if it's not marked - perhaps the influence of the missing lip on a boot like a Hoji on where the center of your foot is positioned?

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 11-11-2018 at 08:48 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    I am looking at using different boots with the same (or within a reasonable range) BSL. I currently have Cochises but will probably add something more suitable for touring in the future. It looks like the likely candidates are close to my Cochise BSL so I'm not too worried about it, just got me thinking how they measure BSL is regards to tech fittings.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,577
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    I am looking at using different boots with the same (or within a reasonable range) BSL. I currently have Cochises but will probably add something more suitable for touring in the future. It looks like the likely candidates are close to my Cochise BSL so I'm not too worried about it, just got me thinking how they measure BSL is regards to tech fittings.
    BSL is really boot sole length regardless of the type of boot (or sole rocker); but clearly a boot without a lug in same size (26.0) will have a smaller BSL, ie ~300mm vs 280-5mm ish.

    Whether you can use both with one mount depends on the range of travel of your binding.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    You can see on the order of a 15mm BSL difference on touring boots with the same mondo size.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Mofro261 View Post
    BSL is really boot sole length regardless of the type of boot (or sole rocker); but clearly a boot without a lug in same size (26.0) will have a smaller BSL, ie ~300mm vs 280-5mm ish.

    Whether you can use both with one mount depends on the range of travel of your binding.
    That’s what I was wanting to know. So the “BSL” marking on the paper template may or may not line up when it comes to tech bindings.

    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    You can see on the order of a 15mm BSL difference on touring boots with the same mondo size.

    ... Thom
    This is why I started looking into it. Chances are I won’t end up with a boot without a toe lug on these skis, just got curious. If what mofro said is true then worrying about it before I have boots in hand seems pointless. I was thinking about erroring the mount toward one side of the adjustment or the other but I think I’ll just shoot for the middle.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,577
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    That’s what I was wanting to know. So the “BSL” marking on the paper template may or may not line up when it comes to tech bindings.



    This is why I started looking into it. Chances are I won’t end up with a boot without a toe lug on these skis, just got curious. If what mofro said is true then worrying about it before I have boots in hand seems pointless. I was thinking about erroring the mount toward one side of the adjustment or the other but I think I’ll just shoot for the middle.
    I ski in boots that are mostly 25.5. And for most 25.5's, thats close to 295 mm. That is NOT foot size, ie 25.5 cm is the interior-ish size. I have tlt6 boots which have minimal lugs, I sized up to a 26.0 for width but that boot is a 287mm, staying in the the 25.5 the length is 277 and I would have needed to remount.

    So, mount skis for the boots you have or want to get, and that BSL, or roll the dice and split the difference and hope whatever boot you choose fits in the adjustment range.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    I'd look a Evo's published BSL tables. As you've noted, you're going to find things clustered about both extremes for your foot size - the Scarpa F1 and other light/fast boots on the short side, and the Hawx/Technica/Lange at the other end of the scale.

    You might try allowing for about 2/3 adjustment range in one direction or the other. It might work - or not. I once played this game but ended up with the next size shorter shell and missed dual compatibility by a mm ;-)

    As far as boots with short toe lips are concerned, some companies move the Dynafit inserts back a bit for stride efficiency, and this further reduces the "BSL" from a mountng perspective (toe pin cup to heel insert distance).

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 11-11-2018 at 08:50 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    923
    Thanks OP, very interesting question. Ideally, tech fitting equipped boots should also be advertised with something like TFD, tech fitting distance. Or at least, toe tech fitting to virtual boot center distance. Where something like virtual boot center would be defined by where it would be if boot had iso toe and heel welts.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,039
    when ever I do a mount (almost always without a template) I locate the boot on the ski according to where I want boot center so I mark center on the boot with a sharpie or piece of masking tape and put a T square on the ski to line up the boot at ski center or wherever I want it in relation to ski center and I check the distance from tail in case the ski center marks are rong ... this is what is important

    Take a tape measure and measure from the front of an AT or alpine shell to boot center & the rear of boot shell to the boot center mark, it will be the same cuz center of the boot is the center of the boot, I can't see a speed nose altering the boot center or the BSL measurement

    yes the Hoji boot will have the pins slightly rearward of a non-speed nose AT boot but its the boot's position on the ski to ski center that is important IMO

    so either the toe piece will be more foreward for normal or more rearward for Hoji by the distance of the difference of the pins if you wana care/geek out that much
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    Boot sole length: the length of the boot sole. Not the length of the tech inserts, not the internal length. Don’t over think it.
    If you didn’t mount your own fucking skis, the shop will use a jig for low tech bindings which goes off the inserts, not the boot sole. Sometimes tools help, and you can just pay your local ski shop.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    I thought everyone here mounted their own fucking skis. It’s not really a question of how to mount them, it’s a question of is there a defined relationship between BSL and tech fitting spacing and what the point is of even stating the BSL of a boot with no toe lug.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,352
    Templates work on standard BSL, but some touring boots have toe inserts further back than others. Paper templates for tech bindings often have a mark for the pin line. Fiddle around with that and you'll have all the info you need.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,039
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    I thought everyone here mounted their own fucking skis.
    fuck i hope not

    But how does that relationship matter as long as the boot center is correct ?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,577
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    I thought everyone here mounted their own fucking skis. It’s not really a question of how to mount them, it’s a question of is there a defined relationship between BSL and tech fitting spacing and what the point is of even stating the BSL of a boot with no toe lug.
    Ask yourself: does the toe pivot point alter where the center of boot is placed, or does the placement of the boot center dictate where the pins should be located?

    If you cant answer that then yes please go to a ahop. Warning: they also need to know what boot you need them for.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Mofro261 View Post
    BSL is really boot sole length regardless of the type of boot (or sole rocker); but clearly a boot without a lug in same size (26.0) will have a smaller BSL, ie ~300mm vs 280-5mm ish.

    Whether you can use both with one mount depends on the range of travel of your binding.
    Thanks for all the “extra” advice but I really didn’t need help getting a boot centered. Just curious as to whether or not one can conclude that two boots with similar BSLs can fit in a tech binding as they will in an alpine binding.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,039
    then why did you ask such a stupid question ?

    the answer is ... maybe

    edit: if you know which 2 boots/bindings you wana combine you might encompass the 2 different BSL ?
    Last edited by XXX-er; 11-11-2018 at 10:13 PM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    4,605
    Quote Originally Posted by Mofro261 View Post
    If you cant answer that then yes please go to a ahop. Warning: they also need to know what boot you need them for.
    And for a tech binding, most reputable shops won't do the mount without the actual boot that is intended to be skied in the binding. The insert/pin interface is not always perfect and requires final adjustment before final tightening to ensure the boot is centered on the vertical plane perpendicular to the ski.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    Okay.

    Calm down.

    There's a fucking mark on the bottom of the boot.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,364
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    Thanks for all the “extra” advice but I really didn’t need help getting a boot centered. Just curious as to whether or not one can conclude that two boots with similar BSLs can fit in a tech binding as they will in an alpine binding.
    Unless they are a Dynafit boot with "Speed Nose" or one of a few Scarpa boots (early F1 and F3, for example) when they shortened the distance between the tip of the toe lug and the inserts, they will be remarkable similar.

    Edit to add: After thinking about it, I believe Scarpa moved the inserts further away from the toe for a couple years to get the pivot point closer to the ball of the foot - I think I had F1, F3 and Spirit 3 boots that came this way. I believe they were ~15mm from the tip of the toe lug rather than ~12mm.
    Last edited by gregL; 11-12-2018 at 10:15 AM.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    Mount the toe piece of your pin binding for the marked center on the bottom of your rando touring boot (with the shorter bsl) on the recommended mount line of the ski.

    Then adjust the heel track of your pin binding for your longer bsl at/alpine boot, which puts the center of that boot 0 to 10 mm back of the line on the ski.

    It will ski fine.

    It will all work out.

    You are okay.

    Lucky Strike. It's toasted.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    ID
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by reckless toboggan View Post
    Mount the toe piece of your pin binding for the marked center on the bottom of your rando touring boot (with the shorter bsl) on the recommended mount line of the ski.

    Then adjust the heel track of your pin binding for your longer bsl at/alpine boot, which puts the center of that boot 0 to 10 mm back of the line on the ski.

    It will ski fine.

    It will all work out.

    You are okay.

    Lucky Strike. It's toasted.
    Thanks. I needed that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •