Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420

    Quiver extension -> school me on bindings / inserts

    Dear Mags,

    the last two years I was lucky enough to almost manage with powder skis only. Therefore my quiver now consist of

    DPS L120 Pures with IONs
    DPS Spoon with King Pins (3rd Mount at -1)
    old Movement Logic X (pre rocker) with Dynafits

    This / the next season however I am expanding.

    I already got an old DPS RPC Hybrid 186cm (in the mail right now - but I will do the 4th mount on them)
    I am planing to get some allmountain ski probably a Black Crows Daemon (for days at the resort, kind of what you might call a daily driver).
    In distant future I'd like to get some touring ski, that is slightly heavier than the Logic X but skis better (thinking Kästle, BC Solis...) and maybe even some real carver for exclusive groomer use.


    So now I am stuck with the questions how to proceed with Bindings.

    - Do I want King Pins/ Shifts for the RPC or Pivots? Did anybody skin with those? I'd like to use them to skin in / out of resorts to get freshies a few days after a refresh of powder but no big hikes.

    - Do I want inserts to switch between RCP / Deamon (carving ski) and maybe save money in the long run? If so - how about changing stoppers for different width? Is that easy?

    - Should I pull King Pins from the Spoons to use them on more skis? Could I put inserts in the already existing holes?

    - Do I want Ions or ATKs on the RPC and get Pivots for the Daemon and and switch those with a future carving ski? How about stoppers?

    - Any Ideas on how to avoid hole-conflicts in the RPC?

    - Does this make any senes to anybody?

    Sidenotes: I am skiing Z-values around 8. I have Lange Freetours 130 and a pair of light touring boots.


    Thanks for your input!

    Edit: Anybody wants to sell some bindings I might find useful and ship to europe?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    two years ago was not a great powder year in Switzerland. Last year however....

    It looks like you have your tech bindings covered, so I'd go with an alpine binding (or shift if you want to have touring capability). Having switched from dynafit beasts to STH + CAST last year for my 'freeride' ski, i cannot understate how much better an alpine binding skis. And the beast was not bad to begin with. I feel a lot more confident and in control going fast in shitty snow.

    Inserts: I've never used them but it seems a hassle to switch regularly.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by smooth operator View Post
    two years ago was not a great powder year in Switzerland. Last year however....
    I was skiing in Canada, too


    Quote Originally Posted by smooth operator View Post
    It looks like you have your tech bindings covered, so I'd go with an alpine binding (or shift if you want to have touring capability). Having switched from dynafit beasts to STH + CAST last year for my 'freeride' ski, i cannot understate how much better an alpine binding skis. And the beast was not bad to begin with. I feel a lot more confident and in control going fast in shitty snow.
    Talking about the RPC I guess?


    Quote Originally Posted by smooth operator View Post
    Inserts: I've never used them but it seems a hassle to switch regularly.
    I feel like I would only do this in a dry, warm place at home and could decide the day before what skis I want to bring.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    I have inserts in all my skis to handle alpine/AT/tele. Takes a few minutes to swap bindings or skis. Can be done out in the cold or inside. If you can turn a screwdriver you too can change bindings.

    Get a few extra screws though otherwise loosing one would suck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,579
    Heh, I just noticed I have different bindings on every pair I use.

    Move upside and let the man go through...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    I am not so sure about the old DPS color scheme - any recommendations on what to put on those RPCs?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,579
    Quote Originally Posted by LeoK View Post
    I am not so sure about the old DPS color scheme - any recommendations on what to put on those RPCs?

    4th mount??? Whatever doesn't have hole conflicts, and the only way to know is to know what the other 3 mounts were for, at what BSL, and what your current BSL is.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,081
    I would forget about the inserts and just find some slightly used alpine skis that already have bindings
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    9
    Also Jumping in on this..

    People who use Inserts - Is there any structural integrity issue when regularly swapping out bindings? And is it really as easy as undoing and fastening a few bolts? Or is there more (gluing, sealing ) involved?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    Inserts are epoxied into the ski and the threads are closed, so they seal out water very well.

    The screws used with inserts are stainless machine screws with a fine thread pitch. No issue with repeated use, until the head strips... careful with ball-end hex keys. Stainless is soft relative to steel.

    Some folks advise using a threadlocker to prevent loosening by vibration... those are the same folks who end up accidentally unthreading the insert from the ski when the loctite is too strong or the epoxy isn't right.

    I learned that lesson and ran them dry for years. Had one screw stick due to galling. Must re-tighten daily when used dry.

    Inserts are best for exposed, easily accessed fasteners (pivots, etc). Sucks to adjust a heel fore/aft to access.

    I've done my time with inserts. Not worth the hassle, except with tight budget.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Simsibimsi View Post
    Also Jumping in on this..

    People who use Inserts - Is there any structural integrity issue when regularly swapping out bindings? And is it really as easy as undoing and fastening a few bolts? Or is there more (gluing, sealing ) involved?
    As Norseman said, you use stainless machine screws. They make for a stronger mount than a traditional mount provided you do it right (no data to back that up, just basic logic). I never use locktight and have never lost a screw. I switch out a few times a year, other than those times I don’t bother rethighting. You can tighten em up nice and snug since your threads are metal to metal, if you go with traditional ski torque values you’ll fight loosening screws. So to directly answer your questions; no, yes and no.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,852
    No threadlocker. But vibratite or the old cyclist's trick of some beeswax on threads works well.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by Mofro261 View Post
    4th mount??? Whatever doesn't have hole conflicts, and the only way to know is to know what the other 3 mounts were for, at what BSL, and what your current BSL is.
    unfortunately yes - the guy who sold them had Barons on them and as I really dislike those I asked for ski only. Than he pulled the Barons (size S) and discovered they where not the 2nd but the 3rd mount as he was misinformed by the previous owner. I guess I will have to measure all the holes - create some "mount pattern" for what is there and go try to overlay all kinds mounts digitally before ordering a binding.

    Any thought on reusing some old holes - like from the first mount, already sealed since a winter or something?
    Last edited by LeoK; 10-24-2018 at 01:17 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by LeoK View Post
    Any thought on reusing some old holes - like from the first mount, already sealed since a winter or something?
    pul the plug carefully and you should be fine. If the screw spins you can always helicoil.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Mexico 2.0
    Posts
    819
    If you don't mind the added stack height, and you are planning on using an older binding, Sollyfit/Dynalook/etc plates will almost certainly solve your Swiss-cheese problems. Won't work with Kingpins or Shifts though.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dystopia
    Posts
    21,113
    Quote Originally Posted by smooth operator View Post
    pul the plug carefully and you should be fine. If the screw spins you can always helicoil.
    Or an insert if it spins

    I have reused holes several times with no issues. Just try to catch the old threads. And use thin epoxy to help soak into the wood core.

    Kingpins with inserts on the dps rpc makes sense. Pull them off your spoon.
    Spoon is a magic day ski, so fiddling with screws the night before is part of the fun.

    Inserts are easy but don't expect to want to change all the time. Rarely used skis do better.

    I rarely Tele. But can swap a Tele binding if needed.

    Inserts are also great for travel. Lightens the ski bag when bringing multiple pairs.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by Toddball View Post
    If you don't mind the added stack height, and you are planning on using an older binding, Sollyfit/Dynalook/etc plates will almost certainly solve your Swiss-cheese problems. Won't work with Kingpins or Shifts though.
    I really hope to avoid stack height but this sounds like a good backup plan. Thanks.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    Or an insert if it spins

    I have reused holes several times with no issues. Just try to catch the old threads. And use thin epoxy to help soak into the wood core.

    Kingpins with inserts on the dps rpc makes sense. Pull them off your spoon.
    Spoon is a magic day ski, so fiddling with screws the night before is part of the fun.

    Inserts are easy but don't expect to want to change all the time. Rarely used skis do better.

    I rarely Tele. But can swap a Tele binding if needed.

    Inserts are also great for travel. Lightens the ski bag when bringing multiple pairs.
    This makes perfekt sense (at least budget wise). I will try to make them fit between existing mounts. Do I have to expect any trouble with the spoon when putting inserts in the existing holes (already at the 3rd mount at -1, too)? The last thing I want to do is fuck up the spoon as they are so f*cking hard to get.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    I have reused holes several times with no issues. Just try to catch the old threads. And use thin epoxy to help soak into the wood core.
    If I am re-using a hole in a ski what I do is turn a screw slowly BACKWARDS in the hole by hand using just a PZ3 driver bit

    I use just the bit so I can feel the screw drop into the threads as it goes around so I know where the thread starts then I turn clockwise and I have always hit the threads without fucking them up

    Snug down the screw with some epoxy and don't overtighten
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dystopia
    Posts
    21,113
    Quote Originally Posted by LeoK View Post
    This makes perfekt sense (at least budget wise). I will try to make them fit between existing mounts. Do I have to expect any trouble with the spoon when putting inserts in the existing holes (already at the 3rd mount at -1, too)? The last thing I want to do is fuck up the spoon as they are so f*cking hard to get.
    If you put an insert in an old screw hole, the hole is bigger. You Drill again and tap before inserting.

    But really, epoxy is amazing. Your skis are made with it. Strong stuff
    . . .

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    848
    Good discussion here, but I think OP is going down the rabbit hole on inserts/plates rather than looking at the quiver -

    You have spoons w/ kingpins and l120's w/ IONs. In what situation would you want to tour on the RPC's over those skis or a skinny touring ski?? I'd say just mount the RPC's w/ alpine binders and tour on the dedicated touring quiver

    You could also just mount RPC's w/ shift. Expensive, first year, but they're a hit so far...

    If you're mounting alpine, NO you do NOT want inserts to move from RPC's to a skinnier alpine ski. You're talking about skiing at an 8 DIN - buy 2 pairs of $100 10-din binders. IIRC, when I originally did inserts, it was about $100 to get the tools, inserts for two skis, and screws. Just buy two pairs of binders. Used if you need 13+ din, new if you ski at 8

    Plates or inserts will overcome the hole conflict issue, though. A couple tests have swiss-cheesed inserts w/ existing holes and held fast.

    You're way over thinking this

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    Good discussion here, but I think OP is going down the rabbit hole on inserts/plates rather than looking at the quiver -
    ... probably



    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    You have spoons w/ kingpins and l120's w/ IONs. In what situation would you want to tour on the RPC's over those skis or a skinny touring ski?? I'd say just mount the RPC's w/ alpine binders and tour on the dedicated touring quiver
    It is not about choosing this at home or in a parking lot. It would be more like skiing in a resort on groomers and just next to them and than you see this slope and you want to go there as it is nice and untracked but you have to skin like half an hour or an hour or you just go down something and have to skin back to the lifts. It just opens up a lot of possibilities on resort days in many places here and I often carry skins just in case something comes along but in general if the conditions are not as nice I hope to get more groomer / hardpack performance out of the RPC than the L120.



    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    You could also just mount RPC's w/ shift. Expensive, first year, but they're a hit so far...
    yes, but first year concerns and expensive as you said.



    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    If you're mounting alpine, NO you do NOT want inserts to move from RPC's to a skinnier alpine ski. You're talking about skiing at an 8 DIN - buy 2 pairs of $100 10-din binders. IIRC, when I originally did inserts, it was about $100 to get the tools, inserts for two skis, and screws. Just buy two pairs of binders. Used if you need 13+ din, new if you ski at 8
    ok, this seems like the way to go if I go alpine. But 100$ for inserts would be cheaper than getting KingPins (at least for what I have seen around here so far).



    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    Plates or inserts will overcome the hole conflict issue, though. A couple tests have swiss-cheesed inserts w/ existing holes and held fast.
    ok - I will see what is needed. Thanks to XXXer and Core Shot, too.



    Quote Originally Posted by sruffian View Post
    You're way over thinking this
    agreed.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    420
    I have now gotten hands on the planks and as expected it does look confusing with all the existing holes.

    I would highly appreciate if somebody would care to enlighten me on what has been mounted here before:

    Red marks are holes of a Baron from the guy who sold them. With the comparison template I figured that the green one are probably a Dynafit Vertical mount. The rest - no idea. I could not relate the blue mark to anything in the comparision pdf.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF1975.jpg 
Views:	52 
Size:	839.5 KB 
ID:	255141   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF1975anmerkungen.jpg 
Views:	52 
Size:	357.4 KB 
ID:	255142  

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Mexico 2.0
    Posts
    819
    Quote Originally Posted by LeoK View Post
    I have now gotten hands on the planks and as expected it does look confusing with all the existing holes.

    I would highly appreciate if somebody would care to enlighten me on what has been mounted here before:

    Red marks are holes of a Baron from the guy who sold them. With the comparison template I figured that the green one are probably a Dynafit Vertical mount. The rest - no idea. I could not relate the blue mark to anything in the comparision pdf.
    White + blue looks like a Marker Griffon demo.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    I came here to praise inserts and instead walked into a game of Chinese checkers


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •