Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 174
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,708

    Million Dollar idea generation

    Yer million dollar ideas, put them here.



    Isaac Asimov


    How do people get new ideas?

    Presumably, the process of creativity, whatever it is, is essentially the same in all its branches and varieties, so that the evolution of a new art form, a new gadget, a new scientific principle, all involve common factors. We are most interested in the “creation” of a new scientific principle or a new application of an old one, but we can be general here.

    One way of investigating the problem is to consider the great ideas of the past and see just how they were generated. Unfortunately, the method of generation is never clear even to the “generators” themselves.

    But what if the same earth-shaking idea occurred to two men, simultaneously and independently? Perhaps, the common factors involved would be illuminating. Consider the theory of evolution by natural selection, independently created by Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace.

    There is a great deal in common there. Both traveled to far places, observing strange species of plants and animals and the manner in which they varied from place to place. Both were keenly interested in finding an explanation for this, and both failed until each happened to read Malthus’s “Essay on Population.”

    Both then saw how the notion of overpopulation and weeding out (which Malthus had applied to human beings) would fit into the doctrine of evolution by natural selection (if applied to species generally).

    Obviously, then, what is needed is not only people with a good background in a particular field, but also people capable of making a connection between item 1 and item 2 which might not ordinarily seem connected.

    Undoubtedly in the first half of the 19th century, a great many naturalists had studied the manner in which species were differentiated among themselves. A great many people had read Malthus. Perhaps some both studied species and read Malthus. But what you needed was someone who studied species, read Malthus, and had the ability to make a cross-connection.

    That is the crucial point that is the rare characteristic that must be found. Once the cross-connection is made, it becomes obvious. Thomas H. Huxley is supposed to have exclaimed after reading On the Origin of Species, “How stupid of me not to have thought of this.”

    But why didn’t he think of it? The history of human thought would make it seem that there is difficulty in thinking of an idea even when all the facts are on the table. Making the cross-connection requires a certain daring. It must, for any cross-connection that does not require daring is performed at once by many and develops not as a “new idea,” but as a mere “corollary of an old idea.”

    It is only afterward that a new idea seems reasonable. To begin with, it usually seems unreasonable. It seems the height of unreason to suppose the earth was round instead of flat, or that it moved instead of the sun, or that objects required a force to stop them when in motion, instead of a force to keep them moving, and so on.

    A person willing to fly in the face of reason, authority, and common sense must be a person of considerable self-assurance. Since he occurs only rarely, he must seem eccentric (in at least that respect) to the rest of us. A person eccentric in one respect is often eccentric in others.

    Consequently, the person who is most likely to get new ideas is a person of good background in the field of interest and one who is unconventional in his habits. (To be a crackpot is not, however, enough in itself.)

    Once you have the people you want, the next question is: Do you want to bring them together so that they may discuss the problem mutually, or should you inform each of the problem and allow them to work in isolation?

    My feeling is that as far as creativity is concerned, isolation is required. The creative person is, in any case, continually working at it. His mind is shuffling his information at all times, even when he is not conscious of it. (The famous example of Kekule working out the structure of benzene in his sleep is well-known.)

    The presence of others can only inhibit this process, since creation is embarrassing. For every new good idea you have, there are a hundred, ten thousand foolish ones, which you naturally do not care to display.

    Nevertheless, a meeting of such people may be desirable for reasons other than the act of creation itself.

    No two people exactly duplicate each other’s mental stores of items. One person may know A and not B, another may know B and not A, and either knowing A and B, both may get the idea—though not necessarily at once or even soon.

    Furthermore, the information may not only be of individual items A and B, but even of combinations such as A-B, which in themselves are not significant. However, if one person mentions the unusual combination of A-B and another the unusual combination A-C, it may well be that the combination A-B-C, which neither has thought of separately, may yield an answer.

    It seems to me then that the purpose of cerebration sessions is not to think up new ideas but to educate the participants in facts and fact-combinations, in theories and vagrant thoughts.

    But how to persuade creative people to do so? First and foremost, there must be ease, relaxation, and a general sense of permissiveness. The world in general disapproves of creativity, and to be creative in public is particularly bad. Even to speculate in public is rather worrisome. The individuals must, therefore, have the feeling that the others won’t object.

    If a single individual present is unsympathetic to the foolishness that would be bound to go on at such a session, the others would freeze. The unsympathetic individual may be a gold mine of information, but the harm he does will more than compensate for that. It seems necessary to me, then, that all people at a session be willing to sound foolish and listen to others sound foolish.

    If a single individual present has a much greater reputation than the others, or is more articulate, or has a distinctly more commanding personality, he may well take over the conference and reduce the rest to little more than passive obedience. The individual may himself be extremely useful, but he might as well be put to work solo, for he is neutralizing the rest.

    The optimum number of the group would probably not be very high. I should guess that no more than five would be wanted. A larger group might have a larger total supply of information, but there would be the tension of waiting to speak, which can be very frustrating. It would probably be better to have a number of sessions at which the people attending would vary, rather than one session including them all. (This would involve a certain repetition, but even repetition is not in itself undesirable. It is not what people say at these conferences, but what they inspire in each other later on.)

    For best purposes, there should be a feeling of informality. Joviality, the use of first names, joking, relaxed kidding are, I think, of the essence—not in themselves, but because they encourage a willingness to be involved in the folly of creativeness. For this purpose I think a meeting in someone’s home or over a dinner table at some restaurant is perhaps more useful than one in a conference room.

    Probably more inhibiting than anything else is a feeling of responsibility. The great ideas of the ages have come from people who weren’t paid to have great ideas, but were paid to be teachers or patent clerks or petty officials, or were not paid at all. The great ideas came as side issues.

    To feel guilty because one has not earned one’s salary because one has not had a great idea is the surest way, it seems to me, of making it certain that no great idea will come in the next time either.

    Yet your company is conducting this cerebration program on government money. To think of congressmen or the general public hearing about scientists fooling around, boondoggling, telling dirty jokes, perhaps, at government expense, is to break into a cold sweat. In fact, the average scientist has enough public conscience not to want to feel he is doing this even if no one finds out.

    I would suggest that members at a cerebration session be given sinecure tasks to do—short reports to write, or summaries of their conclusions, or brief answers to suggested problems—and be paid for that, the payment being the fee that would ordinarily be paid for the cerebration session. The cerebration session would then be officially unpaid-for and that, too, would allow considerable relaxation.

    I do not think that cerebration sessions can be left unguided. There must be someone in charge who plays a role equivalent to that of a psychoanalyst. A psychoanalyst, as I understand it, by asking the right questions (and except for that interfering as little as possible), gets the patient himself to discuss his past life in such a way as to elicit new understanding of it in his own eyes.

    In the same way, a session-arbiter will have to sit there, stirring up the animals, asking the shrewd question, making the necessary comment, bringing them gently back to the point. Since the arbiter will not know which question is shrewd, which comment necessary, and what the point is, his will not be an easy job.

    As for “gadgets” designed to elicit creativity, I think these should arise out of the bull sessions themselves. If thoroughly relaxed, free of responsibility, discussing something of interest, and being by nature unconventional, the participants themselves will create devices to stimulate discussion.
    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/5...get-new-ideas/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,899
    Toilet with lower lumber support.

    Name:  P1090698.JPG
Views: 2243
Size:  52.3 KB
    Master of mediocrity.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,502
    Siphon Hydropower. Now I just gotta find a lake I can drain. I'm gonna be rich I tellya.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,305
    perpetual motion machine

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,365
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    Siphon Hydropower. Now I just gotta find a lake I can drain. I'm gonna be rich I tellya.
    Urinal turbines!

    Sent from my SM-N950U using TGR Forums mobile app

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bellevue
    Posts
    6,535
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    Siphon Hydropower. Now I just gotta find a lake I can drain. I'm gonna be rich I tellya.
    https://hackaday.com/2017/07/12/plac...tric-mountain/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,502
    Here's one I thought of a while ago because I want one, a Dawn Alarm Clock. It's got a chip or whatever, you set your location and the date, and you can set your alarm at whtever you want in relation to dawn - right at dawn, half and hour before, an hour after, whatever you want. It adjusts as the time of dawn changes, a few minutes a day. You could run it off the internet, off gps, a chip with some memory, whatever.

    I don't like wasting daylight and I don't like getting up in the dark either. I want "The Dawn of Time" tm

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    6,179
    At my startup, we are putting dildos on the block chain!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    24,100
    Keyboard generators. There's a fuckload of energy being pressed into keyboards, so put little generators on each key or at least the vowels, and voila, gigawatts of energy.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,305
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    Here's one I thought of a while ago because I want one, a Dawn Alarm Clock. It's got a chip or whatever, you set your location and the date, and you can set your alarm at whtever you want in relation to dawn - right at dawn, half and hour before, an hour after, whatever you want. It adjusts as the time of dawn changes, a few minutes a day. You could run it off the internet, off gps, a chip with some memory, whatever.
    Existing technology covers that. It's called a raised window shade.
    Last edited by GeezerSteve; 10-09-2018 at 03:35 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,502
    Oh ho you got me there Stevie!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,883
    7 minute abs


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    15,360

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,863

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,502
    Quote Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark View Post
    Well I hope they make a million dollars!

    I actually searched for it a while back but using the word "dawn' so I never saw that. Thanks

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    5,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirshredalot View Post
    At my startup, we are putting dildos on the block chain!
    Welcome, visionaries

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,863

    Million Dollar idea generation

    Some trustafarian should make a freeskiing YouTube channel and possibly turn a $2500 profit on year 7

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,342
    All female car dealerships
    40 ounce coozies (somebody eventually did this and they did not make a million)
    binocs that could take pics (somebody eventually did this)

    i had more and i forget them, not very visionary-like to do that.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,305
    virginity restoration clinic

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    12,911
    Fuck drones. I'm developing artillery package delivery. Suck it, Amazon!

    Sent from my SM-G960U using TGR Forums mobile app
    Daniel Ortega eats here.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,883
    Quote Originally Posted by GeezerSteve View Post
    virginity restoration clinic

    Already exist.
    Vaginoplasty is a procedure that aims to "tighten up" a vagina that's become slack or loose from vaginal childbirth or aging. ... Surgery can be performed on the labia major (the larger, outer vaginal lips), or the labia minor (the smaller, inner vaginal lips).


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,544
    Poober - it's Air b'n'b for toilets, complete with ratings for bathrooms and poopers. I'll make a million!

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirshredalot View Post
    At my startup, we are putting dildos on the block chain!
    This has real promise, but can it scale?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    on the banks of Fish Creek
    Posts
    4,348
    Quote Originally Posted by swissiphic View Post
    Toilet with lower lumber support.

    Name:  P1090698.JPG
Views: 2243
Size:  52.3 KB

    Back problems harshing yer poop buzz? This product may be just what yer lookin fer...



    Name:  5A536E3E-3A88-45D8-BB73-8495568C133E.png
Views: 799
Size:  202.9 KB





  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,305
    Quote Originally Posted by AK47bp View Post
    Already exist.
    Vaginoplasty is a procedure that aims to "tighten up" a vagina that's become slack or loose from vaginal childbirth or aging. ... Surgery can be performed on the labia major (the larger, outer vaginal lips), or the labia minor (the smaller, inner vaginal lips).
    Nice, but that doesn't restore virginity.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •