Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by skifishbum View Post
    thing about them medical certs
    them fuckers alway make ya prove competence
    where as avvy the just want the $$ i guess
    No avalanche class has to have formal evaluation or testing to meet guidelines until you hit Pro 1.

    A 4 hour CPR course has minimum competency and a test and it expires after 2-3 years without a refresher.

    WFR? You better believe you can fail the course via practical or written assessment... but then again a WFR is more hours than Avalanche Rec 1 + Rescue + Rec 2 and as a certification it requires a refresher or expires after 3 years.

    My Level 1 and AvRescue actually has a graded written test and field competencies... but it is a rarity...

    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    A lot of people's "Safe Zones" aren't very safe at all.
    True Safe Zones vs "safer zones" is a running theme of my entire course... sorry I don't mean this to be about what I teach but I keep reflecting on what I see and how I can change what I do personally, professionally, and educationally.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,302
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Learn Micro-Strip and/or 3-Circle... these are absolutely necessary backup tools.
    The whole thing is a great list, but this is the one I need to focus on. I'm familiar with both methods but not competent enough at either for them to be useful in a real situation. This is probably the single greatest hole in my avalanche rescue abilities.

    As others have said, preventing multiple people from getting caught is certainly one of those easier said than done things. That was the main thing I took away from the Sheep Creek accident. That group WAS traveling one at a time, from safe zone to safe zone, problem was they underestimated the potential size of an avalanche and thus picked a safe zone that actually wasn't. It was eye-opening for me at the time because I realized how many times I had made that exact mistake.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    14,615
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    The whole thing is a great list, but this is the one I need to focus on. I'm familiar with both methods but not competent enough at either for them to be useful in a real situation. This is probably the single greatest hole in my avalanche rescue abilities.

    As others have said, preventing multiple people from getting caught is certainly one of those easier said than done things. That was the main thing I took away from the Sheep Creek accident. That group WAS traveling one at a time, from safe zone to safe zone, problem was they underestimated the potential size of an avalanche and thus picked a safe zone that actually wasn't. It was eye-opening for me at the time because I realized how many times I had made that exact mistake.
    I think you might want to revisit the accident report on Sheep Creek. Nothing about what they were doing was safe travel practice. Spacing out on a slope that is suspect isn't safe travel practice. One at a time means one person exposed to the hazard, period. An island of trees on an avalanche slope isn't a safe zone. Of course there are exception but when you start splitting hairs bad shit happens.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,302
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    I think you might want to revisit the accident report on Sheep Creek. Nothing about what they were doing was safe travel practice. Spacing out on a slope that is suspect isn't safe travel practice. One at a time means one person exposed to the hazard, period. An island of trees on an avalanche slope isn't a safe zone. Of course there are exception but when you start splitting hairs bad shit happens.
    You're right that they were spaced out, not traveling strictly one at a time, my apologies for mis-remembering.

    That said, they DID think the stand of trees was a safe zone, and was out of the avalanche path. I'm not saying I would have made that exact mistake on that exact slope. I am saying that they had a safe zone, that they thought would be safe, and it wasn't. I have made that mistake too, but thankfully nothing slid when I made that mistake.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    If you go back to 99-00 it was over 50% of incidents. The next season <40%. Fatal accidents are probably a poor lens to gaze at avalanches through.
    It is the only clear lens, even if it is a narrow view.

    I'm well aware that nonfatals are often not reported if they don't require SAR.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,546
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    preventing multiple people from getting caught is certainly one of those easier said than done things. That was the main thing I took away from the Sheep Creek accident. That group WAS traveling one at a time, from safe zone to safe zone, problem was they underestimated the potential size of an avalanche and thus picked a safe zone that actually wasn't.
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    I think you might want to revisit the accident report on Sheep Creek. Nothing about what they were doing was safe travel practice. Spacing out on a slope that is suspect isn't safe travel practice. One at a time means one person exposed to the hazard, period. An island of trees on an avalanche slope isn't a safe zone. Of course there are exception but when you start splitting hairs bad shit happens.
    Yep....

    It is rare that we have as clear of evidence of a deep-persistent avalanche problem as we did the week leading up to this accident. Some of the group likely drove by fresh evidence of the problem in Straight Creek on their way to Saturday's event. Before their tour, the group read about the conditions in the avalanche bulletin and identified deep-persistent slabs as the primary avalanche problem. They selected terrain that was less likely to produce a deep-slab avalanche, but to get there they traveled through a dangerous area. At least 3 members of the group reached the "island of safety" they had identified, only to be subsequently caught and buried in the avalanche.

    It is easy to underestimate the consequences of getting caught in a deep-persistent slab avalanche, because these slides are often much bigger than most of the avalanches witnessed by backcountry recreationalists. Deep-persistent slabs do not form every year, like storm and wind slab avalanches. The only effective travel technique for this avalanche problem is to avoid areas where deep slabs might release, or if the risk is deemed acceptable, expose a single group member to the danger. Spreading out often does not mitigate the risk to the group because these avalanches are always large and destructive.

    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,610
    And for the record, the season leading up to that accident seemed very similar to this season.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    And for the record, the season leading up to that accident seemed very similar to this season.
    Agreed
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Agreed
    Yup....
    "True love is much easier to find with a helicopter"

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vernon BC
    Posts
    1,765
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    That's because people have been trained to be stupid and unaware. Folks jump through the hoops when it comes to avalanche education and it seems like most of them don't even understand what's going on.
    Even the "pros" fall victim to poor group management and poor selection of safe zones .... see the thread about the Guides out of Golden.

    Decision making is super complex, and humans are not that great at it most of the time.... "hope for the best, prepare for the worst"
    "Its not the arrow, its the Indian" - M.Pinto

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •