Results 1 to 23 of 23
Thread: MTN Explore 88 vs 95
-
02-21-2018, 10:06 PM #1
MTN Explore 88 vs 95
If anyone has been on both, do they ski pretty much the same except for float? I've seen a lot of info about the 95's, but not much about the 88. The weight savings are not insignificant.
-
02-21-2018, 10:07 PM #2
MTN Explore 88 vs 95
Paging Lee. The 88s area around super cheap, so this is pressing . How good are the 88s in nonpow, as in firm or corn?
-
02-22-2018, 08:24 AM #3
The wife and I both took a single run on next year's 95's (topsheet change only) at the recent dealer demon and were pretty shocked by how poorly the edges held on bulletproof, especially compared to other similar offerings including: Hannibals, VTA 98, Backland 95, Zero G 95........ We tested a bunch of touring boards and they were at the bottom of the heap with respect to grip on firm. Would really give me pause on a scratchy entrance. May have simply been the tune, or lack of tune, but we both experienced the same thing on the 77's and 84's we tried. On conditions other than really hard and scraped off the 95's are excellent. The best ski that Salomon makes in my opinion. I would have gotten on the 88's but they didn't even have any available for demo. From what I've read the 88's are similar to the 95's with a touch less rocker and a slightly more splayed tail. Doesn't really answer your questions but it's all I got. I've been looking hard at the 88's myself.
-
02-22-2018, 08:42 AM #4
-
02-22-2018, 08:51 AM #5
-
02-22-2018, 10:23 AM #6
I've skied 95's in soft conditions and thought they were great. Was thinking about getting a pair for my wife (who absolutely lovers her Hannibal 100's) but this really gave us pause. I am perfectly willing, and actually hopeful, that someone else will have had good experience with them on hard surfaces. I really want to like this ski for a spring touring option. It's shocking how often reps show up to demos with shitty tunes on their skis and this may have been a good example. I would encourage you to get observations from others and consider our experience as one of many.
That said, I can say that we were both duly impressed with several others in these conditions. With respect to grip on icy we would rank them from best to least as: Zero G 95, VTA 98, Hannibal = Backland 95 = VTA 108, all being pretty close, then G3's new Synapse 101 replacement (can't remember the name),..........and then Mtn Explore 95. Given the construction it's hard to understand why we experience such poor edge grip. In fact, my wife tried the first and I saw, but didn't fully believe, what she was experiencing, which is what led me to try them myself with the same results. I'm really interested to hear what others have experienced. Both the 95's and 88's should be kick ass spring skis.
-
02-22-2018, 10:34 AM #7
That's my intended purpose, along with boot top or less pow. 95s sound great, super versatile, but your comments re edge hold spook me cuz I'd use them for stratovolcanoes and other tours where I'm likely to encounter firm up high. I tried Zero G 95s, not for me.
Anybody help re LT and Mrs. LT were victims of a bad tune?
-
02-22-2018, 12:05 PM #8
Below is a quote from the Blister 17/18 Buyers guide regarding the Explore 95. Their experience doesn't jibe with ours so I inclined to think at least part of what we experienced was poor tune. Lee's response above also supports the idea that they are good on ice. It however gives me pause in that we saw the same thing on two pair of 95's.
"The MTN Explore 95 is a very good choice for long touring days with lots of vert, especially if you’re likely to encounter a variety of snow conditions and consequential, no-fall terrain. For its weight and width, this ski inspires a lot of confidence, and has a very predictable feel. In tight couloirs, it is light, balanced, and provides solid edge hold even on hard, windblown snow."
-
02-22-2018, 12:19 PM #9
Yeah, I saw the blister review. I'm still leaning towards the 95. If I get it and don't like the edge hold, I can try a more aggressive edge angle
-
02-22-2018, 12:33 PM #10
I'm still trying to figure out whether it's worth the weight savings to go for the 88. Steve, what bindings would you be putting on the 95?
-
02-22-2018, 12:40 PM #11
Anybody else wish manufacturers would quit naming all their skis and boots and bindings the same thing?
that's all i can think of, but i'm sure there's something else...
-
02-22-2018, 12:44 PM #12
Speed Turn 2.0 w/ DIY comfort-style top plate/volcano. Boots will be TLT6M. Same combo I've used on other touring skis, some fatter. Works for me. The 95s or alternative (Hannibal?) will replace my old beat-to-shit clapped-out Vectors.
88s would be my choice if I weighed <200 lbs. I haven't ruled them out. 88mm is a nice width for a spring/summer touring/skimo ski, although the 95's extra float will help hold up my fat ass when I hit the mush down low or later in the day.
-
02-22-2018, 12:58 PM #13
-
02-22-2018, 01:21 PM #14
To be fair, I had limited exposure -- 2 runs and my boot was est. 1cm behind factory center, maybe not a big deal cuz I have a long boot (327) so my ball of foot was close to where it should be. Test runs had a mix of spring conditions, some firm, some corn, some mush. Anyway, they were fine on the firm and corn -- way better than my clapped out Vectors -- but I just didn't dig them down low in the soft and mush, where they seemed like much more effort to turn than my Vectors. I may well have enjoyed them in bigger boots, but I'm very satisfied with my TLT6Ms and looking for a ski to match them. FWIW, I'm getting old and more cautious, and like a more forgiving ski. I also like the (claimed by some) dampness of the MTN Explore 95 and 88.
YMMV. Zero G 95s certainly have plenty o' fans.
-
02-22-2018, 01:27 PM #15
-
02-22-2018, 02:04 PM #16
I've skied the MTN Explore 95 in a variety of conditions and think it's a great ski - certainly it doesn't have the edgehold of the best in class (Zero G 95) but certainly not the worst (Wailer 99 Tour 1) but super versatile and pivots more easily into the fall line (and through it) on steeps and in funky snow than the Zero G (I am also a fan, but have detuned them a fair amount). I spent a few runs on icy groomers on the MTN Explore 88 (not Mission this year) and felt it was also fine.
-
02-22-2018, 02:13 PM #17
-
02-22-2018, 02:13 PM #18
-
02-22-2018, 03:46 PM #19
Looks like Steve and I both got what we wanted!
-
02-22-2018, 04:06 PM #20
You bastards buy the last two at powder7?
-
02-22-2018, 04:23 PM #21
-
02-23-2018, 04:01 PM #22
You guys should try Tim (ptex) at skibootrx. I think his price (at least in the 95) beats powder7.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using TGR Forums mobile app
-
02-23-2018, 04:09 PM #23
Bookmarks