Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 242
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    5,550
    Andy's purple L138 spoons were damn sexy and didnt seem to hold him back on the skin tracks either. Too bad he got the croup and couldn't ski after day 3. I was tempted to pick up some L138s to play on after that, but internally I cant justify having 120 and 138 touring skis. Yet.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Simi Valley, CA
    Posts
    5,513
    If anyone wants a L138 with a little more sidecut and flat underfoot and a bit of camber, check out the Hangfire Staunchwall. http://hangfireskis.com/skis/

    I picked up a used pair but haven't skied them yet. They're not as stiff as L138, but look like a fun ski.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    5,640
    I’ve got some 202s. Good for learning how to kickturn

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Cascades
    Posts
    503
    Bump. Where do people mount these? DPS site says they recommend +1.5cm (what's the point of a "recommended" line then?), different recommended mounts for Pure and Alchemist, very confusing. Most of my other skis are mounted -1 to -5 of ski center, so I'm comfortable with forward mounts, but if I get tip dive that would be embarrassing.

    Oh yeah, I should mention that mine are R3.2, flex 2, Pure, 192cm.

    DPS mount chart, etc:
    https://www.dpsskis.com/company/faqs/tuning-mounting
    Last edited by Toddball; 10-09-2018 at 02:31 PM.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NWCT
    Posts
    2,010
    I’m at +1.5 on my R3.2 hybrids. I like them there. They’re waaaaay further back, -11.15 from center, than my other whips (mostly around -5 to -8) but they’re money there, IMO.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    is everything
    Posts
    1,760
    im at 1.5 or 2 on my 3.2 pures w mega shovel rocker and they rule there. I also have the new spooned ones too, but i cant figure out their sweet spot. I need to mess with the bevel this season and see if that loosens them up.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    16,233
    On all the 138s I've had, I like them at 0 -- with the exception of the R0 (pointy tip), where 0 was way too far forward, and -2 would probably have been pretty good.

    My old bamboo sidewall ones (R1 ?) were submarines at +1 or +.5, something like that -- I was trying to re-use as many of the old holes as possible, and mounted some Griffon demo bindings on them. Slid them back to 0, or maybe -.5 (somewhere in the vicinity), and they are much better there.

    I like more rearward mounted skis generally, so YMMV. I almost never mount a ski ahead of the 0 or recommended line.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Cascades
    Posts
    503
    Bump. Groomers were terrifying the other day.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20190118_114855016.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	721.5 KB 
ID:	265330

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Simi Valley, CA
    Posts
    5,513
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    My old bamboo sidewall ones (R1 ?) were submarines at +1 or +.5, something like that -- I was trying to re-use as many of the old holes as possible, and mounted some Griffon demo bindings on them. Slid them back to 0, or maybe -.5 (somewhere in the vicinity), and they are much better there.
    Think the recommended mount for the R1 is -1 or so. I ended up at -1.5 due to existing holes, and like them there.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    3,840
    I've owned spats and got rid of them when I got powder boards. I regret that because I think I likes the spats better... Just a little more loose and more fun in tight trees.

    I still have the powder boards and keep them for cat skiing. They're still super fun in the right conditions, but I don't take them in resort for fear of the splits.

    I had protests and didn't love them... But it could have been the mount point.

    I haven't read the entire thread to see if it was mentioned but I also have a pair of bluehouse maestro (134-118-131). Like has been described of similar skis, they make a few inches of pow ski like way more... They are especially fun in heavier and wind effected pow.

    Like most of the boutique brands there were subtle differences from year to year.. Some intentional and some not. The pair I have now has a tiny bit of camber and they're super fun, but a later model year (panda) had a pressing "error" where they came out completely flat camber and were base high by a small amount. While this was not intentional and normally considered a flaw, it made these skis ski almost exactly like the spats in powder but still fun on firm. They're just a little more loose than my current pair.

    The pandas were in my car when it was stolen... Those skis.

    Always wanted to try the 138 but haven't yet.

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NWCT
    Posts
    2,010
    Spent today on 138s in 12”+ of windhammered heavy Vermont mank. Pretty much ideal R/R conditions and they killed it, as usual. A little more challenging once shit was tracked out and bumped, but still fun as hell.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,037
    I'm going to pick up a pair of #4 or #5 core powder boards from praxxis to use in the funky wind buff / rain soaked days we get in Tahoe. Miss my spatulas

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Boonville/Truckee, CA
    Posts
    429
    Rode my rocker 2, 202cm flex 3’s Friday and Monday at Sugarbowl during the last storm cycle. Was great to get back on them. Fun, fast, so versatile in 3D snow.

    Almost feels like cheating there so fast but can shut down just as fast. They kill low angle run-outs, i can usually pass skiers making my own tracks. Floaty, surfy, stomp able.

    Have gpo, and wootest, for when theres not much fresh. And wailer 112 for early/late season and family days, great mini golf ski.
    Drink to remember not to forget!
    Fourisight Wines

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,050
    Checking in to report that I took the 202s out on their maiden voyage yesterday by virtue of forgetting the skins for my normal setup.

    25 degree dad laps on Rogers - holy shit these things are fun. I'm totally gonna be "that guy" skiing these things in all sorts of conditions. Stoke for truly deep days, and mellow meadow skip days alike has just increased significantly.

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,573
    Welcome to the club!

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    682
    Nothing, absolutely Nothing is as fun as a pair of Lotus 138 in pow.

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    549
    Took out my 195 praxis pow boards the other day. For heavy wind affected pow, nothing else is better.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Juans
    Posts
    480
    200 Lotus 138 got the nod for 38” of Wolf Creek blower yesterday. Best pow ski of all time.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7006.JPG 
Views:	128 
Size:	327.6 KB 
ID:	270646




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,573
    Curious about peeps experience with the newer version with a 32m radius. Mine are the version with basically no radius.

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    405
    For all the people who still havent got a pair and for those few lucky enough to ski theirs to pieces they are making another batch:
    https://www.dpsskis.com/powderworks-lotus-138
    Fortunately, for my wallet, no 202s available...
    Not that Ive ever really felt the need for a pair. Just the want...

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wasnatch
    Posts
    79
    Holding some 192s if anyone is interested in buying, first or second mount with Griffons
    This job would be great if it weren't for the fucking customers

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,573
    New ones are about $1k more than I bought mine for from dps.

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    10
    Damn, 1,400$ is steeeeeep. Are all of the powderworks layups marked up over their normal skis or is this just for the 138, and if so, why?

  24. #174
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Zurich, Switzerland
    Posts
    350
    138 is no longer in their "normal" lineup. You can only get it during special runs like Powtime now. So you can not compare prices. It seems the Lotus 124 wich was simply sold out (but I guess remains in the "normal lineup") seems to be in line with the "normal" price.

    Maybe they raised prices...

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    1,732
    Quote Originally Posted by LeoK View Post
    Maybe they raised prices...
    They’re DPS. Of course they did.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •