Results 1,701 to 1,725 of 6693
Thread: Ikon Pass
-
03-10-2019, 12:31 PM #1701
-
03-10-2019, 12:58 PM #1702
There’s a payment plan, guy. It’s new this year. You should look into it. Cool if I crash at yer place?
crab in my shoe mouth
-
03-10-2019, 02:29 PM #1703
X
-
03-10-2019, 04:10 PM #1704AF
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Sandy by the front
- Posts
- 2,345
-
03-10-2019, 04:26 PM #1705
-
03-10-2019, 04:32 PM #1706
SX-91s were ok. I had 2-3 pairs.
The Force-9s were a great ski patrolling boot as were the Force-93s. By now I cannot see how the liners would be worth a shit.
Today at the really Big the Tram line was huge. Mostly Ikon passes. Chatted with several of them, they has all come up from JHMR and said the vibe down there was very aggro towards IKON.
-
03-10-2019, 04:32 PM #1707
-
03-10-2019, 05:37 PM #1708Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Seattle
- Posts
- 3,763
-
03-10-2019, 05:42 PM #1709
-
03-10-2019, 05:43 PM #1710Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- United States of Aburdistan
- Posts
- 7,281
There's a rumor of a Black Ikon Pass coming that you can skip all the tram/chair lines anywhere. $5K.
-
03-10-2019, 06:20 PM #1711
How can you tell if someone is using an Ikon pass or not? Isn't it tucked in your pocket and not visible? (that's the case at Squaw / Alpine / Mammoth / and even Niseko).
-
03-10-2019, 06:54 PM #1712
I wouldn't count "retro style" as any type of positive for these boots... most everyone looks at me as if I farted in church when they see me in mine. They are comfortable, they are warm, they are easy to get on and off, and they don't hinder my skiing in any way. I don't ever notice them once up on the hill, even at the end of long days, they just disappear and I can focus on skiing. That's probably the best compliment I can give. Oh, and they are cheap...I paid $27 for my last pair.
-
03-10-2019, 07:39 PM #1713
-
03-10-2019, 08:15 PM #1714
Black ikon is a BBS deal
https://m.facebook.com/BlackIKONPass/. . .
-
03-10-2019, 08:52 PM #1715Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- United States of Aburdistan
- Posts
- 7,281
-
03-10-2019, 10:38 PM #1716
They'll find another excuse to shoot a tourist.
-
03-11-2019, 10:18 AM #1717
-
03-12-2019, 09:46 AM #1718Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,663
JACKSON HOLE PENS OPEN LETTER ON RECORD SKIER VISITS:
https://www.tetongravity.com/story/c...6hnXoEHD8xC4WU
Just a reminder that I predicted 10%
-
03-12-2019, 09:59 AM #1719
-
03-12-2019, 10:02 AM #1720
Well ... likely true if "survive" = profit to an acceptable degree.
-
03-12-2019, 10:05 AM #1721
I think the problem at all these major resorts is that "survive" means bringing home duffel bags of cash every season. The owners of these big mega hills have their own lifestyles to maintain and you can't "survive" when the wife can't have her beachfront in Malibu and the bungalow in Curaçao.
-
03-12-2019, 10:08 AM #1722Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,663
-
03-12-2019, 10:16 AM #1723
I think another way to look at it involves anticipating the swings between a good year and a bad year. If you've got a million dollar business that swings 5% then that means you move $50,000 year to year. If you are a 85 million dollar business (last I saw that was Jackson Hole Resorts approx?) that means you move over $4 million year-to-year if you fluctuate 5%. And I think ski areas fluctuate more than that.
Therefore, if you want to shoot for break even you might lose or make $4 mill. Losing 4 mill can bankrupt most any company. Therefore, their idea of "survival" is probably to move that needle to aiming to make 10 mill each year (anticipating a 12% +/- swing or something like that), so that even in a bad year they at least break even. In a good year they make serious bank, yes, but if they can break even in a bad year than they won't ever hit a existential crisis point.
Kinda makes sense.
-
03-12-2019, 10:20 AM #1724. . .
-
03-12-2019, 10:22 AM #1725
Bookmarks