Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7
Results 151 to 154 of 154
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    NW WA
    Posts
    329
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    the pseudo floodplain manager in me is curious if these flooded areas were in the FIRM-mapped (or USACE mapped) 1% (100-year) or 0.2% ( 500-year) floodplain. any known failures to floodplain structures such as levees or floodwalls?
    A bit of a mixed bag. Some of the areas inundated were in the FIRM 1% flood area, but some were outside of it. Additionally some places that are in the 1% area stayed dry. https://www.whatcomcounty.us/Documen...eas-PDF?bidId=
    I know of two levee failures during the flooding, but neither contributed significantly to the flooding. One was a small creek that failed outside of the 100-year flood area but only impacted a few homes, and another was a levee failure on the Nooksack that occurred in the floodway after the peak of the flooding.
    Sediment levels in the river have risen significantly since that map was last updated though, and no work has been permitted to remove any of it. Perhaps this flood will change that.

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    valley of the heart's delight
    Posts
    2,481
    What a mess. I watched an older video where a hydrologist said the design flood (500 year) for Fraser River is something near 60,000 m^3/s. From poking around at various river gauges, the highest I could find for this flood is 6,000 m^3/s. Anyone know what's up with that? I suppose it does look like the normal 100-year flood aftermath in California - some area near a river covered in brown water, ag land or former ag land.

    Hope you all dry out soon.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,999
    Quote Originally Posted by gavinski91 View Post
    A bit of a mixed bag. Some of the areas inundated were in the FIRM 1% flood area, but some were outside of it. Additionally some places that are in the 1% area stayed dry. https://www.whatcomcounty.us/Documen...eas-PDF?bidId=
    I know of two levee failures during the flooding, but neither contributed significantly to the flooding. One was a small creek that failed outside of the 100-year flood area but only impacted a few homes, and another was a levee failure on the Nooksack that occurred in the floodway after the peak of the flooding.
    Sediment levels in the river have risen significantly since that map was last updated though, and no work has been permitted to remove any of it. Perhaps this flood will change that.
    Thanks for the info. A lot is going to be different now.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,394
    Nooksack River

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2188-2.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	393174

    Flood water floating on salt water in Hale Passage

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2125-2.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	393179

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •