Page 67 of 134 FirstFirst ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,675 of 3330
  1. #1651
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by skibrd View Post
    I haven’t kept up with this thread so I’m behind on what issues or non-issues people have had, so if I’m repeating what you have already heard, sorry.

    Quick background: me 6-4 230lbs with gear, ski pretty hard, 100+ days a season, have a career that lets me do it, sort of nice.

    Bindings: Were my roommates (forgot this part when I went sell them, kill me if you want, I wasn’t trying to be malicious, just forgot), he skied them 2 days only touring, no resort based skiing, and is 5-4 130lbs soaking wet, aka a small dude. I skied them 14 days, 2 were only touring, 6 were side country, rest were inbounds. Of those 14 days, 12 were in Japan, 2 were in Jackson Hole, one of which was touring and one inbounds. I abuse my Pivot 18s because they are steel, my Shifts were babied because I don’t trust plastic bindings.

    Roommate had no issues, just didn’t like them better then CAST or Dynafits, traded them to me.

    My issues:
    1) AFD height would not stay put unless it was way too high. If set correctly, it would drop down over the ski day and create slop in the toe piece. I adjusted it to where it was ‘correct’ once more, issue repeated it self, so I turned the AFR height way too high, to the point where the AFD wouldn’t slide with my boot in it, no matter how hard I pushed, it never dropped again. This didn’t bother me, I didn’t see it as an issue, figured it was a set up issue with my XT Free Pros with the DIN soles, not a warranty issue.

    2) Stupid brake retainer system kept popping up on tours so my brakes would drag. I’m super out of shape and I was so tired on skin tracks that I didn’t really notice. Fixed it when I did notice, but not always. Figured it was me not engaging it correctly, not clearing enough snow out of the heel piece or something.

    3) I walked out of these more times then I can remember. Soft snow, hard snow, didn’t matter, often when changing from soft to hard to soft quickly, or landing a drop (5-10ft max, career and all, plus age) not perfectly balanced. Same thing would happen, Id walk out and land on my face. DIN was at 11, which is standard for me for Pivot 14s and 18s. Forward pressure was set by the shop (aka roommate who is not a drunk or stoner, but a UVM engineer taking a year off before starting an engineering job) initially as per the directions. After the first few shift outs, I turned up the pressure, kept happening but less frequently, so I turned it up some more, kept happening. I averaged shifting out 1-2 times a day, worst was 6 or 7, that day sucked. I attributed my walking out to the Shifts not having the same elasticity as Pivots, and me pushing them too far. I saw it as the Shift being more of a touring binding then a freeride binding, not a binding manufacturing issue.

    Issue roommate saw was something with the forward pressure spring area I think. He worked today and we didn’t get a chance to talk about other then a quick text. He said it didn’t look the same as others he has seen. Kids smart, not your usual dumb duck tech. I’ll report back when I know more.


    Needless to say I’m going back to CAST and Kingpin 13s. I haven’t had issues with either of those, knock on wood.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    If you're able to post some pictures I would appreciate it Skibird

  2. #1652
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Couloirfornia
    Posts
    8,871
    Possible to throw some locktite on the AFD screw shaft?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest_Hemingway View Post
    I realize there is not much hope for a bullfighting forum. I understand that most of you would prefer to discuss the ingredients of jacket fabrics than the ingredients of a brave man. I know nothing of the former. But the latter is made of courage, and skill, and grace in the presence of the possibility of death. If someone could make a jacket of those three things it would no doubt be the most popular and prized item in all of your closets.

  3. #1653
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by LightRanger View Post
    Possible to throw some locktite on the AFD screw shaft?
    Talked about this today. I'm gonna take it apart tomorrow and find out.

    I would be interested to know if people with more rockered soles are having the AFD issues or if its a bigger problem with the AFD up high at an angle for DIN and GW soles. One of mine seems to be staying the other keep clicking down....
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  4. #1654
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Quote Originally Posted by Eluder View Post
    Talked about this today. I'm gonna take it apart tomorrow and find out.

    I would be interested to know if people with more rockered soles are having the AFD issues or if its a bigger problem with the AFD up high at an angle for DIN and GW soles. One of mine seems to be staying the other keep clicking down....
    My GW soles on Lupos have mega rocker. For alpine soles, the AFD need to be cranked way up


  5. #1655
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,206
    I have Salomon rockered soles with a low AFD height and so far *knock on wood* no issues with the AFD. For a little more weight I bet they could have made the adjustable AFD slide forward-backward like some other brands do....maybe it's patented. But the worm drive and that angle seem like non-optimal engineering design choices.

  6. #1656
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732
    I have GW Lupo's. The AFD is pretty high still.

    I wouldn't call GW boots mega rockered.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  7. #1657
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Quote Originally Posted by Eluder View Post
    I have GW Lupo's. The AFD is pretty high still.

    I wouldn't call GW boots mega rockered.
    What boot idea more? I speak from ignorance


  8. #1658
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    here
    Posts
    2,129
    a note about the pics in my experiment above from last night:
    In mentioning the wings were still not tight to the boot toe I meant vertically....I did NOT adjust forward pressure for the experiment (there's only so much I'm willing to do for you tweakers ) and it would NOT change the fact that the AFD shouldn't be tweaked that high nor skied on like that....the whole point is to take note of alpine vs tech with the toe wings/afd....a lot of boot variances which has been mentioned before...


    Here's a Lange Comp 120 (ignore forward pressure not being set)..the resistance met in turning the screw indicated to stop raising the afd..it's still not touching the boot and that angle just seems wrong...I wouldn't want to ski on that set up....maybe the claim that these are alpine compatible is a bit of a stretch or maybe I'm talking out of my ass....still love the binding.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3671[1].jpg 
Views:	156 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	268867



    now back to the Scarpa tech setting......which of these two pics do you think will perform the way it should?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3655[1].jpg 
Views:	139 
Size:	1.09 MB 
ID:	268868


    very much looking forward to the pics of the deconstruction of the afd Eluder
    Last edited by train07; 02-09-2019 at 06:57 AM. Reason: more experimenting

  9. #1659
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,019
    I think I’ll be remounting my Lhasa fats and the wife’s billy goats w pivots this week. Prolly Watch gs for shifts


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  10. #1660
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    147
    XT free pros with alpine soles. Not concerned.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xtfree.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	213.6 KB 
ID:	268888

  11. #1661
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    What boot idea more? I speak from ignorance
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	QEg9ixmYTgW8xqSGx5DoJQ.jpg 
Views:	141 
Size:	797.0 KB 
ID:	268884Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uriNzRPPQS+Wmfq8pcj+6w.jpg 
Views:	138 
Size:	794.4 KB 
ID:	268885

    Pretty much any true AT boot. First pic is a Gea RS vs Lupo Factory, second pic is a Zero G Pro Tour vs Lupo Factory. Another thing to consider is the AFD on GW extends back and more parallel to the ski than the rocker of the boot creating an indent in the sole for the binding to rest.

    This will affect the angle of the AFD, I am hypothesizing that the more angle the AFD has the more likely it is to "shift" during use.... My thought is that the higher angle increases the leverage placed on the stepped block and maybe puts more of a Backwards force (for and aft) on the AFD. With the AFD in a flatter position the force would be more downward into the ski...

    Here is a visual I stole of the AFD adjustment interface I am basing this hypothesis off of. If you push down it it will stay, if you push back and down it can step down. The higher the AFD the shorter the steps are there for making it easier to step down.
    Quote Originally Posted by MnO_____ View Post
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  12. #1662
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by Eluder View Post
    I am hypothesizing that the more angle the AFD has the more likely it is to "shift" during use.... My thought is that the higher angle increases the leverage placed on the stepped block and maybe puts more of a Backwards force (for and aft) on the AFD. With the AFD in a flatter position the force would be more downward into the ski...
    This, especially in alpine sole situations when you’re only applying force to the front edge of the AFD. It’s odd to me that they were able to engineer a change in angle when adjusting up from touring to GripWalk but not another when adjusting from GripWalk to Alpine.

    I wonder if we might see an update in a couple of seasons that uses swappable, rather than adjustable, AFDs. The AFD piece already detaches from the rest of the toe, and, though it would be a SKU nightmare for someone at Solly, seems like a pretty foolproof solution.

  13. #1663
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by burrito View Post
    I wonder if we might see an update in a couple of seasons that uses swappable, rather than adjustable, AFDs. The AFD piece already detaches from the rest of the toe, and, though it would be a SKU nightmare for someone at Solly, seems like a pretty foolproof solution.
    I wouldn't be surprised to see an updated AFD, it seems that it has been proven necessary already. A swappable static AFD won't work unfortunately. All bindings either need an automatic or manual toe height adjustment. This is either done through the toe piece or the AFD to accommodate for differences in boots even within a standardized ISO.

    I am talking out of my ass here but It seems that most of the in use testing on this binding was done while using the MTN Lab, Amers other top level boot that would make sense to use with this binding (the Hawx XTD) dosn't work without modification. You would think the issue would have been found and passed on to dealers if it had been tested extensively with the Hawx XTD. The MTN Lab has a rubber rockered sole that leaves the AFD in the lower range of adjustment. The rubber sole may also help absorb some of the energy that moves the AFD off its step, though it seems increased AFD hight is more likely what is causing the issue. I am not saying the shifting AFD is only going to happen to DIN and GW boots I am only stating it is more likely to because of how the AFD and adjustment mechanism sit when the AFD is the higher positions.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  14. #1664
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Grip Walk and Alpine Soles on Lupo 130. Based on what peeps are guessing, the Grip Walk should work better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1571.JPG 
Views:	163 
Size:	592.0 KB 
ID:	268924Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1574.JPG 
Views:	157 
Size:	661.3 KB 
ID:	268925




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  15. #1665
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    195
    Has anyone tried Cody's method. I just adjusted mine per his method. I'll try em tomorrow and see if it sticks.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  16. #1666
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by Cdubmpdx View Post
    Has anyone tried Cody's method. I just adjusted mine per his method. I'll try em tomorrow and see if it sticks.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
    I have tried some different tactics. The one that I found to work the best is close to how Cody says, but not exactly the same:

    1. Understand that you are not dealing with a stepless smooth setting action, but a step-by-step slider that climbs or goes down one step at the time
    2. Crank the AFD up to one position above what you need
    3. Adjust the AFD down slowly, while putting a bit of pressure on the toe. The AFD will then suddenly click down to the position you need
    4. Tighten the screw about 1/4 of a turn. Not enough to lift it up a click, but to tighten it so that the edge really sits safely on the right level.

    I would say that Codys method have about the same effect, even if he don´t explain what is actually happening mechanically.

  17. #1667
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    here
    Posts
    2,129
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    Grip Walk and Alpine Soles on Lupo 130. Based on what peeps are guessing, the Grip Walk should work better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1571.JPG 
Views:	163 
Size:	592.0 KB 
ID:	268924Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1574.JPG 
Views:	157 
Size:	661.3 KB 
ID:	268925




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I stand firmly behind the total lack of scientific proof when pointing and stating "that just doesn't look right"...
    so yeah.. guessing
    you guys got your afd cranked higher than I was willing to try based on detrusor breaking his screw...
    question for detrusor...did you just strip the head of the screw or you know that it snapped inside?

  18. #1668
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by MnO_____ View Post
    I have tried some different tactics. The one that I found to work the best is close to how Cody says, but not exactly the same:

    1. Understand that you are not dealing with a stepless smooth setting action, but a step-by-step slider that climbs or goes down one step at the time
    2. Crank the AFD up to one position above what you need
    3. Adjust the AFD down slowly, while putting a bit of pressure on the toe. The AFD will then suddenly click down to the position you need
    4. Tighten the screw about 1/4 of a turn. Not enough to lift it up a click, but to tighten it so that the edge really sits safely on the right level.

    I would say that Codys method have about the same effect, even if he don´t explain what is actually happening mechanically.
    That makes a lot of sense. I have Lange Freetours, which are WTR. I don't notices the notches as much the further it raises, which makes it difficult to tell when I'm at the next level. Also brings up the point that someone else brought up about the angle changes and such.

    If I ever start a ski product company, I'm definitely using TGR to beta test before release to the public.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  19. #1669
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    I don’t have mine any more. They are somewhere on the way to being warrantied. I’m a bad TGR mag for the lack of pictures. My bad


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #1670
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Squamish, BC
    Posts
    899
    FYI - I went by the Whistler solly shop yesterday. Word from them is to set the forward pressure so the back edge of the little rectangle lines up with the arrows. This is slightly tighter than flush back edge. And slightly tighter than a shop manual I once saw. Not sure if it makes a difference or not.

    I also noticed that the rear DIN screw can be tightened well past the 13 mark. Anyone have some insight on doing this? Would I get effectively more DIN (just without the cert) doing so? Or just cause some problems?

  21. #1671
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by Judo Chop! View Post
    FYI - I went by the Whistler solly shop yesterday. Word from them is to set the forward pressure so the back edge of the little rectangle lines up with the arrows. This is slightly tighter than flush back edge. And slightly tighter than a shop manual I once saw. Not sure if it makes a difference or not.

    I also noticed that the rear DIN screw can be tightened well past the 13 mark. Anyone have some insight on doing this? Would I get effectively more DIN (just without the cert) doing so? Or just cause some problems?
    Interesting because that’s about where I settled for my forward pressure.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #1672
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    876
    Quote Originally Posted by Eluder View Post
    I wouldn't be surprised to see an updated AFD, it seems that it has been proven necessary already. A swappable static AFD won't work unfortunately. All bindings either need an automatic or manual toe height adjustment. This is either done through the toe piece or the AFD to accommodate for differences in boots even within a standardized ISO.

    I am talking out of my ass here but It seems that most of the in use testing on this binding was done while using the MTN Lab, Amers other top level boot that would make sense to use with this binding (the Hawx XTD) dosn't work without modification. You would think the issue would have been found and passed on to dealers if it had been tested extensively with the Hawx XTD. The MTN Lab has a rubber rockered sole that leaves the AFD in the lower range of adjustment. The rubber sole may also help absorb some of the energy that moves the AFD off its step, though it seems increased AFD hight is more likely what is causing the issue. I am not saying the shifting AFD is only going to happen to DIN and GW boots I am only stating it is more likely to because of how the AFD and adjustment mechanism sit when the AFD is the higher positions.

    What's the issue with the xtd?

  23. #1673
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732

    Here is the link to the post

    Quote Originally Posted by jegsmith View Post
    What's the issue with the xtd?
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...17#post5539517
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  24. #1674
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Judo Chop! View Post
    I also noticed that the rear DIN screw can be tightened well past the 13 mark. Anyone have some insight on doing this? Would I get effectively more DIN (just without the cert) doing so? Or just cause some problems?
    Hard to say without measuring the spring and the dimensions of its container, you could end up with spring bind (the coils bottom out on each other and the spring can't compress any further, leading to things breaking).

  25. #1675
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,290
    Quote Originally Posted by addict View Post
    Crazy question here: anyone know where the front screw/locating bobbin can be sourced for a pair that's missing one? Contacting salomon seems next to impossible and it's kind of an urgent situation. Asking for a friend...
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    You want part number L4075110001 which is for a pair of toe studs inc the mounting screws. In typical ski industry fashion Salomon/Atomic have not had any spares available since the Shift was launched so anyone who lost a stud had to rely on the kindness of a retailer to give them one from a stock binding - which wouldn't usually be a problem but the retailers are selling the bindings like hot cakes and they don't want to be left with a stud'less set they can't sell until the spares become available. Thankfully the spares should be available soon as they're due in to their warehouse on the 8th Feb so retailers who have ordered them will get them around the 13th/14th Feb - so hopefully that's close enough to encourage a retailer to give up one of theirs as it can be replaced pretty quickly.
    addict, did you source some replacement toe studs as my spares stock arrived a few days (and few days earlier than Salomon had originally confirmed for)?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •