Page 57 of 134 FirstFirst ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... LastLast
Results 1,401 to 1,425 of 3330
  1. #1401
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,667
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    have about 15 days on them, both resort and inbounds. ski great downhill, can't tell I'm not on a regular downhill binding if I don't look down at the bindings. Steeps, bumps, drops, you name it, all good. Touring is another story. single climbing bar is annoying. Brakes deploy often while touring, which is more annoying. Also don't care for the weight on the uphill. Personally going to go away from 50/50 setups and get some MTN's or Zeds on dedicated backcountry skis and stick to Pivots on my inbounds skis.

    FWIW, it seems to me that the brakes sticking together thing is intentional. drives me nuts, though.
    Mtn seems a lot more solid to me

    Sent from my moto g(6) using TGR Forums mobile app

  2. #1402
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    Mtn seems a lot more solid to me

    Sent from my moto g(6) using TGR Forums mobile app

    it is. I've skied the Zeds a ton this season on demo skis, if you take the brakes off they're good. The brakes like to break, though. Only reason I'd take them over the MTN's is microadjustable DIN and the fact that it's easier for me to get them at a decent price.

  3. #1403
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,928
    Quote Originally Posted by 1000-oaks View Post
    ^ The side of an STH heel housing is steel (the structural part) on an aluminum track. Different class binding.
    Which brings us back to the point that a shift 916 steel (in red, per reckless toboggan) would be a sweet binding for those of us looking for a primarily inbounds option that'll hold up to abuse, but can still do sidecountry missions that are short enough that the weight doesn't matter.

    Basically, Cast without the fiddle factor.

  4. #1404
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    #RedShift
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  5. #1405
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    here
    Posts
    2,129
    as someone mentioned in a previous post the brake release during touring can be prevented with rubber bands securing the brakes up....you're going to step out for downhill anyway so just remove the rubber bands then...sucks yes, sucks more if you don't?

  6. #1406
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bellevue
    Posts
    7,449
    Quote Originally Posted by reckless toboggan View Post
    #RedShift
    I like it.

  7. #1407
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by scandy89 View Post
    So I'm trying to make a decision on bindings in the next couple days. I want the most downhill performance possible, lots of inbounds use, and lots of quick laps touring (so i've ruled out cast) think the shift is still a safe bet vs something like a tecton or kingpin?
    Not sure if you've come across this thread: https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...-Tectons/page4

  8. #1408
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    226
    One of my brakes disengaged from the rear and slid off the track while skinning leaving tiny marks on the plastic. There might have been ice build-up but nothing extraordinary. Fortunately I saw it and took care not to lose it. I skied down with it – the pressure from the boot heel kept it in place and when I got to the car it was a matter of couple of minutes to put it back together with a screwdriver.

  9. #1409
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by train07 View Post
    as someone mentioned in a previous post the brake release during touring can be prevented with rubber bands securing the brakes up....you're going to step out for downhill anyway so just remove the rubber bands then...sucks yes, sucks more if you don't?
    There’s definitely two stages to fixing the brakes up for skinning and if not followed does mean the brakes will come down whilst walking ,
    Best practice seems to be lift brakes by hand to engage , then press down on the ski / walk piece to get a second positive click in and then I’ve never had them come down , suggest just trying this at home to get the feeling down . It may seem a faff but as you need to take off your skis when transitioning and it does make sense to clear snow from the toe and heel areas it really doesn’t add to much time , and will probably prolong the life of the mechanism as constant boot stamping is not ideal


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #1410
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    Go to a good bootfitter and they will choose the boot for your feet/requirements - and if it does happen to have Quick Step inserts read my posts #1016 and #1253 in this thread then go skiing.
    Sorry. But No need for boot fitter. Just follow your instincts and chose what is best for you.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #1411
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    656
    Lol. Go to a boot fitter. Most people’s instincts about ski boot fit are wrong.

    Also, the Shift brake will engage even if you do the click part. I know because I religiously make sure it clicks, it still engages on me often.

  12. #1412
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    BoZone
    Posts
    592
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Which brings us back to the point that a shift 916 steel (in red, per reckless toboggan) would be a sweet binding for those of us looking for a primarily inbounds option that'll hold up to abuse, but can still do sidecountry missions that are short enough that the weight doesn't matter. Basically, Cast without the fiddle factor.
    From your lips to Salomon's ears....
    Buy the ticket...take the ride.

  13. #1413
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495

    The Official Salomon S/Lab SHIFT MNC Thread -AMA

    You guys who think you need a 916 version do realize you have no evidence of enough failures to justify a heavier version. A few guys with broken bindings on TGR doesn’t really mean anything. If these things all start blowing up like the kingpin then sure you’ll have a point, but we’re not remotely close to that yet.

    You also don’t have any evidence of needing 3 more DIN. Are you guys so really so good or so bad at skiing that you just have to have 3 more DIN?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  14. #1414
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    You guys who think you need a 916 version....
    You also don’t have any evidence of needing 3 more DIN. Are you guys so really so good or so bad at skiing that you just have to have 3 more DIN?
    You have any idea how hard a self reinforcing agglomeration of big boned dentists and cubicle -dwelling gear fappers can ski?

    Pretty hard in some minds

  15. #1415
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,230
    Hey. I put them thru their paces pretty hard during a root canal yesterday.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #1416
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,928
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    You guys who think you need a 916 version do realize you have no evidence of enough failures to justify a heavier version. A few guys with broken bindings on TGR doesn’t really mean anything. If these things all start blowing up like the kingpin then sure you’ll have a point, but we’re not remotely close to that yet.

    You also don’t have any evidence of needing 3 more DIN. Are you guys so really so good or so bad at skiing that you just have to have 3 more DIN?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I don't really care about the DIN. Current Shift is fine for me in that regard.

    But I do care about the durability. It's not like Salomon discovered some new magical material that doesn't break that they've only put to use in the Shift. The Shift weighs less and has more moving parts than a whole slew of previous Salomon bindings that are well known to not be all that durable. Literally every single binding that I've owned over the years that's held up to regular inbounds use is a high din, heavy, mostly metal thing. Lighter weight options maybe lasted a season or three, but eventually ended up in the trash.

    So what I want is a version of the Shift that isn't disposable. We don't need more bindings cluttering up the landfill.

    #redshift

  17. #1417
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495

    The Official Salomon S/Lab SHIFT MNC Thread -AMA

    So it has to be as durable as a high din metal clamp but also light enough to tour with and have pins for the toes? Would you also like it delivered on unicorns?

    You probably know as well as anyone all ski gear is about some sort of sacrifice. If the Shift ain’t it for you just get a CAST setup and live with the fiddle factor.

  18. #1418
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,928
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    Haha so it has to be as durable as a high din metal clamp but also light enough to tour with and have pins for the toes? Would you also like it delivered on unicorns?
    Pay closer attention. We already covered this. I don't care what it weighs. Even the current shift is a mediocre binding if your intention is to primarily tour with it. It's not particularly light by touring binding standards, only one climbing bale, have to take the ski off to transition, etc.

    But the shift has great potential for an 80% inbounds binding that has the ability to do short tours / sidecountry excursions. Basically, a Guardian without all the downsides of a frame binding.

  19. #1419
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495
    50/50 to 80/20 inbounds/out use is what the Shift is for. Until they start failing on a massive scale you don’t have any evidence they can’t work for that use. Just get a CAST setup.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #1420
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,798
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    Two rubber bands can fix this. Annoying I agree.
    Goddamnit everyone. The 50%+ of posts in the last 5 pages have been these problems:

    1. my brakes catch on each other when I take the skis apart + my brakes hit the ski when I switch to ski mode
    2. my brakes release when skinning

    Now I respect the desire for a $500 product to function flawlessly. And I recognize the frustration when a small component detracts from the whole. And I know I over DIY things. But these brake problems are solvable by anyone. Salomon tackled the big issues for you -- alpine ski mode downhill, pin uphill. You can fix the small shit.

    Solution 1: Shave back the plastic on the inside part of the brake closest to the ski. It will affect the ability to 'brake' not at all. Hell, have you ever seen a Pivot brake?? lol.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1161.jpg 
Views:	146 
Size:	604.5 KB 
ID:	263686

    Solution 2: shop rubber bands. $2. 11grams.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1165 2.jpg 
Views:	161 
Size:	1.32 MB 
ID:	263685
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1166 2.jpg 
Views:	138 
Size:	1.39 MB 
ID:	263684


    https://www.backcountry.com/swix-ski...xoC0F4QAvD_BwE
    Last edited by margotron; 01-10-2019 at 12:19 PM.


  21. #1421
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,928
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    50/50 to 80/20 inbounds/out use is what the Shift is for. Until they start failing on a massive scale you don’t have any evidence they can’t work for that use. Just get a CAST setup.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    You sound like the kind of person that's super excited about the salomon z-series.

  22. #1422
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495

    The Official Salomon S/Lab SHIFT MNC Thread -AMA

    Haha and you sound like chicken little.

    For real though I’m nervous about my Shift setup after skiing 916’s my whole adult life. But I’m trying to be realistic about what it is and isn’t and if they aren’t breaking on a large scale I’ll keep pushing them.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #1423
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    shadow of HS butte
    Posts
    6,427
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    get a CAST setup and live with the fiddle factor.
    fiddle factor? never played with these as a kid?

    https://p.globalsources.com/IMAGES/P...blocks-toy.jpg

  24. #1424
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,495

    The Official Salomon S/Lab SHIFT MNC Thread -AMA

    I was quoting Toast - the “fiddle factor” with CAST is why he wants a 916 Shift

  25. #1425
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,717
    I’d like and will get a shift for some ski. All the little issues seems like there’s a work around. Still not sure about a few years use on the hill.
    Not much “fiddle factor” with CAST unless you leave them in your truck overnight with snow on them from the previous day. Isn’t there a few steps for a shift changeover? I bet the new cast is similar time for changeovers maybe seconds difference. If you’re not carrying a pack(quick safe zone sidecountry lap) it’s a pain carrying the toes though (I used my small bike pack for water, skins and toes)
    Tectons are great. Quick, ez, and decent weight. They’re not going to ski like an alpine binding on the hill regardless of the obvious advantage over other pin bindings(heel and toe). It’s a better pin toe but it’s not an alpine toe

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •