Results 1,651 to 1,675 of 3332
-
02-08-2019, 11:19 PM #1651Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 21
-
02-08-2019, 11:58 PM #1652
-
02-09-2019, 12:21 AM #1653
Talked about this today. I'm gonna take it apart tomorrow and find out.
I would be interested to know if people with more rockered soles are having the AFD issues or if its a bigger problem with the AFD up high at an angle for DIN and GW soles. One of mine seems to be staying the other keep clicking down....a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Formerly Rludes025
-
02-09-2019, 01:05 AM #1654
-
02-09-2019, 01:13 AM #1655
I have Salomon rockered soles with a low AFD height and so far *knock on wood* no issues with the AFD. For a little more weight I bet they could have made the adjustable AFD slide forward-backward like some other brands do....maybe it's patented. But the worm drive and that angle seem like non-optimal engineering design choices.
-
02-09-2019, 01:16 AM #1656
I have GW Lupo's. The AFD is pretty high still.
I wouldn't call GW boots mega rockered.a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Formerly Rludes025
-
02-09-2019, 01:22 AM #1657
-
02-09-2019, 04:51 AM #1658
a note about the pics in my experiment above from last night:
In mentioning the wings were still not tight to the boot toe I meant vertically....I did NOT adjust forward pressure for the experiment (there's only so much I'm willing to do for you tweakers ) and it would NOT change the fact that the AFD shouldn't be tweaked that high nor skied on like that....the whole point is to take note of alpine vs tech with the toe wings/afd....a lot of boot variances which has been mentioned before...
Here's a Lange Comp 120 (ignore forward pressure not being set)..the resistance met in turning the screw indicated to stop raising the afd..it's still not touching the boot and that angle just seems wrong...I wouldn't want to ski on that set up....maybe the claim that these are alpine compatible is a bit of a stretch or maybe I'm talking out of my ass....still love the binding.
now back to the Scarpa tech setting......which of these two pics do you think will perform the way it should?
very much looking forward to the pics of the deconstruction of the afd EluderLast edited by train07; 02-09-2019 at 06:57 AM. Reason: more experimenting
-
02-09-2019, 10:11 AM #1659
I think I’ll be remounting my Lhasa fats and the wife’s billy goats w pivots this week. Prolly Watch gs for shifts
Sent from my iPhone using TGR ForumsI rip the groomed on tele gear
-
02-09-2019, 10:34 AM #1660
-
02-09-2019, 10:35 AM #1661
Pretty much any true AT boot. First pic is a Gea RS vs Lupo Factory, second pic is a Zero G Pro Tour vs Lupo Factory. Another thing to consider is the AFD on GW extends back and more parallel to the ski than the rocker of the boot creating an indent in the sole for the binding to rest.
This will affect the angle of the AFD, I am hypothesizing that the more angle the AFD has the more likely it is to "shift" during use.... My thought is that the higher angle increases the leverage placed on the stepped block and maybe puts more of a Backwards force (for and aft) on the AFD. With the AFD in a flatter position the force would be more downward into the ski...
Here is a visual I stole of the AFD adjustment interface I am basing this hypothesis off of. If you push down it it will stay, if you push back and down it can step down. The higher the AFD the shorter the steps are there for making it easier to step down.
a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Formerly Rludes025
-
02-09-2019, 11:03 AM #1662Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Santa Cruz, CA
- Posts
- 612
This, especially in alpine sole situations when you’re only applying force to the front edge of the AFD. It’s odd to me that they were able to engineer a change in angle when adjusting up from touring to GripWalk but not another when adjusting from GripWalk to Alpine.
I wonder if we might see an update in a couple of seasons that uses swappable, rather than adjustable, AFDs. The AFD piece already detaches from the rest of the toe, and, though it would be a SKU nightmare for someone at Solly, seems like a pretty foolproof solution.
-
02-09-2019, 02:45 PM #1663
I wouldn't be surprised to see an updated AFD, it seems that it has been proven necessary already. A swappable static AFD won't work unfortunately. All bindings either need an automatic or manual toe height adjustment. This is either done through the toe piece or the AFD to accommodate for differences in boots even within a standardized ISO.
I am talking out of my ass here but It seems that most of the in use testing on this binding was done while using the MTN Lab, Amers other top level boot that would make sense to use with this binding (the Hawx XTD) dosn't work without modification. You would think the issue would have been found and passed on to dealers if it had been tested extensively with the Hawx XTD. The MTN Lab has a rubber rockered sole that leaves the AFD in the lower range of adjustment. The rubber sole may also help absorb some of the energy that moves the AFD off its step, though it seems increased AFD hight is more likely what is causing the issue. I am not saying the shifting AFD is only going to happen to DIN and GW boots I am only stating it is more likely to because of how the AFD and adjustment mechanism sit when the AFD is the higher positions.a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Formerly Rludes025
-
02-09-2019, 02:58 PM #1664
Grip Walk and Alpine Soles on Lupo 130. Based on what peeps are guessing, the Grip Walk should work better?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
02-09-2019, 03:44 PM #1665Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Posts
- 195
Has anyone tried Cody's method. I just adjusted mine per his method. I'll try em tomorrow and see if it sticks.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
-
02-09-2019, 04:04 PM #1666Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 71
I have tried some different tactics. The one that I found to work the best is close to how Cody says, but not exactly the same:
1. Understand that you are not dealing with a stepless smooth setting action, but a step-by-step slider that climbs or goes down one step at the time
2. Crank the AFD up to one position above what you need
3. Adjust the AFD down slowly, while putting a bit of pressure on the toe. The AFD will then suddenly click down to the position you need
4. Tighten the screw about 1/4 of a turn. Not enough to lift it up a click, but to tighten it so that the edge really sits safely on the right level.
I would say that Codys method have about the same effect, even if he don´t explain what is actually happening mechanically.
-
02-09-2019, 04:54 PM #1667
I stand firmly behind the total lack of scientific proof when pointing and stating "that just doesn't look right"...
so yeah.. guessing
you guys got your afd cranked higher than I was willing to try based on detrusor breaking his screw...
question for detrusor...did you just strip the head of the screw or you know that it snapped inside?
-
02-09-2019, 06:40 PM #1668Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Posts
- 195
That makes a lot of sense. I have Lange Freetours, which are WTR. I don't notices the notches as much the further it raises, which makes it difficult to tell when I'm at the next level. Also brings up the point that someone else brought up about the angle changes and such.
If I ever start a ski product company, I'm definitely using TGR to beta test before release to the public.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
-
02-09-2019, 06:55 PM #1669Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 3,374
I don’t have mine any more. They are somewhere on the way to being warrantied. I’m a bad TGR mag for the lack of pictures. My bad
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
02-09-2019, 06:56 PM #1670
FYI - I went by the Whistler solly shop yesterday. Word from them is to set the forward pressure so the back edge of the little rectangle lines up with the arrows. This is slightly tighter than flush back edge. And slightly tighter than a shop manual I once saw. Not sure if it makes a difference or not.
I also noticed that the rear DIN screw can be tightened well past the 13 mark. Anyone have some insight on doing this? Would I get effectively more DIN (just without the cert) doing so? Or just cause some problems?
-
02-09-2019, 11:42 PM #1671Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 3,374
Interesting because that’s about where I settled for my forward pressure.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
02-10-2019, 09:31 AM #1672Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 891
-
02-10-2019, 10:11 AM #1673
Here is the link to the post
a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Formerly Rludes025
-
02-10-2019, 10:13 AM #1674
-
02-10-2019, 02:37 PM #1675
Bookmarks