Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 223
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by NW_SKIER View Post
    Hello there. Lws told me about you guys when I got my tour as well. I'm somewhat of a gear whore. I'll be watching. Hope to meet you guys and try some skis this year.
    It'd be a pleasure to meet you as well...let us know whenever you're in the area or skiing Stevens or Mission and we'll do our best to get you on some sticks.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by flowing alpy View Post
    AWESOME!!!

    I'm available for testing the Arlo if
    you’ll train it to behave like an Rx

    it will be great if you join us for 18BBI@Alpental
    Deal and I'd also point you in the direction of our Seeger 112...it's a very similar platform to the Rx.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    girdwood
    Posts
    395
    Cool stuff. Are the ski weights anywhere on your website? That’s always helpful info, especially for the BC models.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by STLHD View Post
    Cool stuff. Are the ski weights anywhere on your website? That’s always helpful info, especially for the BC models.
    For sure, those specs are something we're currently in the process of compiling. There is some extrapolation involved since we've not made every iteration of our skis in every length and model but we'll do our best to get that information out soon. In the meantime, however, let me know what model and length you're somewhat interested in and we'll get a weight to you if we have it.

    Cheers

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    2,279
    What kind of weights are you getting on the 187 ramblin jack?

    Could be a goldilocks touring ski for me. Got any demos?

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by flowing alpy View Post
    I’m sending Lithic some BBI stickers
    to help you decorate your new shop.
    Rad, thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    7,510
    Quote Originally Posted by peshastin_proud View Post
    Yeah, so the Protest was my favorite shape while we were at Praxis thus we were unashamedly inspired for our Guthrie and Arlo shapes. One significant difference, though, is that we've added a slightly tighter turn radius to the program which I really dig. Honestly, our Arlo 116 is probably the best pow ski I've ever been on and when the pow turns to chop, man, they really shine. The tapered tip doesn't get deflected and tends to just float over all that heavy PNW blocky stuff. I love those sticks!
    LVS told me about you guys last year and I have been watching your product line since.
    I figured your were from the Praxis crew since your shapes are similar.
    The ProTest is my hands down favorite soft snow ski. I immediately noticed the similarity in the Guthrie as well as the Arlo. A better ProTest sounds unpossible but I'm willing to give'er a try. I will be for sure following this thread to hear more about your builds and future designs.
    Planning on coming out to mission to ski with LVS this winter and wouldn't mind demoing some skis. Maybe we can make arrangements so a few of us mags can make the trip and you guys can shred with us and geek out on skis for the day.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by kai_ski View Post
    What kind of weights are you getting on the 187 ramblin jack?

    Could be a goldilocks touring ski for me. Got any demos?
    Unfortunately, no demos on that ski at the moment but hopefully later this winter. That ski, with our BC core is coming in just over 7 lbs. It’s a ridiculously good BC ski!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    LVS told me about you guys last year and I have been watching your product line since.
    I figured your were from the Praxis crew since your shapes are similar.
    The ProTest is my hands down favorite soft snow ski. I immediately noticed the similarity in the Guthrie as well as the Arlo. A better ProTest sounds unpossible but I'm willing to give'er a try. I will be for sure following this thread to hear more about your builds and future designs.
    Planning on coming out to mission to ski with LVS this winter and wouldn't mind demoing some skis. Maybe we can make arrangements so a few of us mags can make the trip and you guys can shred with us and geek out on skis for the day.
    That all sounds great...we’ll definitely get you on some skis even if I have to unmount my personal Arlos and throw our demo bindings on them. Keep me posted on your visit. We really really like skiing!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    7,510
    Quote Originally Posted by peshastin_proud View Post
    That all sounds great...we’ll definitely get you on some skis even if I have to unmount my personal Arlos and throw our demo bindings on them. Keep me posted on your visit. We really really like skiing!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Will do and appreciate the offer.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    20,266
    I really like the ski naming convention.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    AR/SLC
    Posts
    705
    ^my thoughts exactly. Must be good dudes; they like good music.
    "... when I turn, I just hope it hits me in the face."--Shroder Baker/Under the Influence

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    2,279
    Quote Originally Posted by peshastin_proud View Post
    Unfortunately, no demos on that ski at the moment but hopefully later this winter. That ski, with our BC core is coming in just over 7 lbs. It’s a ridiculously good BC ski!
    If there's a time that works for you guys, I'd like to come take a look at what you've got. I'm in Wenatchee.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    993
    Hey all, the Lithic guys just gave me a heads up about this thread so I figured I'd better chime in. I've been skiing with them and hanging out in the shop a fair bit over the last two seasons, and I was fortunate enough to be involved in developing the Ramblin' Jack last winter. I'm putting myself out there to answer pm's and so forth from you guys about the lineup, and when I get a minute I'll put up some design philosophy about the Jacks. I'll have a pair of 181's with kingpins mounted for a 296 if you want take them for a spin at Stevens.
    Cheers!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    993


    Plus some scenery stoke from the Stevens backside today !


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  16. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    11,466
    The ash/basswood sounds like deans old skis. (H20g) I know they were being pressed/built by praxis, you worked/learned there. Totally makes sense.

    If you can build or have a ski anything like the Kodiak it's full of win. Best ski I ever been on. Still pissed I sold em

    Good luck. Sounds like you're on the right track.

    Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app
    http://www.firsttracksonline.com

    I wish i could be like SkiFishBum

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    787
    That Prine 108 really perks me up. Looks like just a fun ski. Any further comment on it? Thanks

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    3,594
    Quote Originally Posted by peshastin_proud View Post

    ....we do use fiberglass in two different weights depending on the length of the ski......

    ....We do not use finger joints...

    ....each pair is taken out of the same core block....

    ...We press pairs together....
    These seem like obvious best practices. Surprised to hear this is not industry standard.
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Church of the Nifty Blue Chrysler
    Posts
    4,953
    Those practices work well when you're dealing with a very small volume of skis, but I believe it is far more common for skis to be paired at QC based on weight, camber, rocker height/length and possibly flex.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,106

    Whats up with Lithic Skis?

    Quote Originally Posted by peshastin_proud View Post

    As far as weights, this is another thing we've debated putting on the site and, full disclosure, it was meant to be added when we retooled our site but have been too busy to add those specs. Essentially, our Cash 110 in a 184 length weighs about 8.5lbs with our inbounds/standard core. That number keeps us a bit lower than perhaps our closest competitor (product-wise, not volume-wise), ON3P, who I'd admit is making great stuff. In fact, they're one of the few independent companies out there who we truly respect for making a quality product and seemingly doing things right. We personally don't like bamboo cores since they tend to be soft and heavy which is a bit of a bad dynamic. This conclusion comes from the fact that we make a bunch of OEM skis for other brands who have asked us to use bamboo core...the weight difference is significant!
    Weight is good for inbounds skis!!!

    1900g/ski is WAYYY too light for me on a 110mm waist, inbounds ski. My thinnest, 92mm skis weigh 2100g/ski.

    I would love to hop onboard, but need more weight!

    Soft and heavy cores make for the best “playful charger” skis, at least IMO. I would take that any day over stiff/light.

    Not trying to knock on you, I just dont want you to forget about all the clydesdale skiers from the get go..Looking forward to buying your beefiest, baddest ski in the future! Needs to be at least 2350g/ski in a wider ski, before I even consider buying.

    Good Luck!

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    6,604
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Weight is good for inbounds skis!!!

    1900g/ski is WAYYY too light for me on a 110mm waist, inbounds ski. My thinnest, 92mm skis weigh 2100g/ski.

    I would love to hop onboard, but need more weight!

    Soft and heavy cores make for the best “playful charger” skis, at least IMO. I would take that any day over stiff/light.

    Not trying to knock on you, I just dont want you to forget about all the clydesdale skiers from the get go..Looking forward to buying your beefiest, baddest ski in the future! Needs to be at least 2350g/ski in a wider ski, before I even consider buying.

    Good Luck!

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Dude these guys can rip on skis, don't get twisted up on weights. They aren't building some rando twig. A combination of weight, materials, shape, camber etc make the difference in a skis in snow feel.

    (Oh and ps, the lithic guys and I both agree that more mass to skis is better than less. We've had multiple conversations about it. In fact for their bc skis they've made them a bit heavier than they theroretically could, to improve downhill performance.)

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by kai_ski View Post
    If there's a time that works for you guys, I'd like to come take a look at what you've got. I'm in Wenatchee.
    Unless we’re skiing we are in the shop daily. My email is on our site. Give me a heads up of when you’re wanting to come by and we’ll try to make it work.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by jmars View Post
    That Prine 108 really perks me up. Looks like just a fun ski. Any further comment on it? Thanks
    It’s a great daily driver. Quick edge to edge, can hold a nice carve but can also release our if a turn nicely if you like throwing your skis sideways. I’d consider it one of our more playful models but with our core makeup it still has a damp feel.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Weight is good for inbounds skis!!!

    1900g/ski is WAYYY too light for me on a 110mm waist, inbounds ski. My thinnest, 92mm skis weigh 2100g/ski.

    I would love to hop onboard, but need more weight!

    Soft and heavy cores make for the best “playful charger” skis, at least IMO. I would take that any day over stiff/light.

    Not trying to knock on you, I just dont want you to forget about all the clydesdale skiers from the get go..Looking forward to buying your beefiest, baddest ski in the future! Needs to be at least 2350g/ski in a wider ski, before I even consider buying.

    Good Luck!

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    We completely agree with you on most of these points. However, I tend to lean towards medium stiff and somewhat heavy for an inbounds charger. Everyone skis differently, though. If you plan on riding chairs then weight shouldn’t be a consideration at all, in my opinion. That’s coming from someone who only skis pivot 18s on every ski I ride.

    The reason we don’t particularly like carbon in skis is precisely because that composite gives you that stiff/light dynamic that gets deflected by the slightest snow variation (and breaks easily!)...I think we are on the same page in that regard.

    And, honestly, if you’re not going on mega tours, I tend to steer folks towards our inbounds core makeup for their touring rig. That’s what I tour on and get about 25 backcountry days in a year. However, if I’m on a volcano mission I’ll lighten things up, for sure.

    Our beefiest and widest ski is our Guthrie 120 and the first iteration of that ski was super burly, fast and really badass...honestly, though, my legs couldn’t even ski them until February last winter. We’ve chilled that one out a bit by tweaking the core thickness and have found a really happy medium. However, if anyone is a bigger person, who skis strongly we can make adjustments to our flex, which correlated to our weight, to accommodate. It’s a simple email request and it’s done.

    Hope some of these thoughts help.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    Those practices work well when you're dealing with a very small volume of skis, but I believe it is far more common for skis to be paired at QC based on weight, camber, rocker height/length and possibly flex.
    That sounds like a really bad way to do it but I suppose it happens. However, most presses that are worth their weight can press a pair at a time.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •