The Fight for the Padded Room (NSFW)

[mtngirl79]

There are parts of the site that are more of a boys club Mtngirl, if you don't approve of the content, you need to stay away.
If you are here fucking up stuff for everyone else, you need to go. The rights of the many outweigh the rights of the few.
Please stay out of threads that may offend you or we will all tell you to fuck off.

Fuck you. You do not have the right to beat off to photos posted without consent. No matter how many of you want to do it, the rights of the women in the photos supersedes yours.

[buttahflake]

Jelly, I'll let you clean up...

So you guys are banging!
Good for you.

[NW_SKIER]

don't you have a sheep to fuck?

This is disappointing and weak, you're an IT dork so I guess it's to be expected.

you are not the ER dishwasher?

? Don't work in the ER.

my mistake - thought you did

No, no, no. Aaron is the Magellan of men's buttholes, remember? Dude goes exploring in buttholes like a bum looks for cans in the trash. Full commitment.

[MagnificentUnicorn]

No, no, no. Aaron is the Magellan of men's buttholes, remember? Dude goes exploring in buttholes like a bum looks for cans in the trash. Full commitment.

I have found some interesting items in men's rectums. We once extracted, with great difficulty, a full, sealed 1000 caplet bottle of Kirkland ibuprofen. The guy told us he was a pain in the ass.

[farmer]

You know what's next? They're going to tell us we can't swear anymore.

Seems like running that cunt mtngirl off would solve both problems.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using TGR Forums mobile app

[spindrift]

Funniest thread ever. It is a hoot to watch the pathetics howl while mtngirl pwns you for your idiot "He Man Woman Hater Club" mindset. Is porn really the most important thing to you here? More than having a more vibrant ski community? If so, you suck.

The claims of "just don't look at it" are BS. It is no different than any other bigoted excuse for hostile environments. Including racist ones. I mean hey, stay at the other end of the restaurant or the back of the bus. Sure, we can have 2nd class citizens who are cut out of the total life of the community.. I mean why not - because what ski forum is not primarily about jerking off?

[buttahflake]

Yeah, and she is a member of this community.
Don't lose sight of that. It should mean something.

[GeezerSteve]

I mean why not - because what ski forum is not primarily about jerking off?

Stoke or stroke? That is the question

[Mazderati]

Lol at all the people here complaining about MtG fucking up threads who then run out and start five new threads because people think it’s wrong to post pictures of naked women without consent.

But they know they have lost the argument so now they’ve resorted to gaslighting, personal attacks and slippery slope arguments because they can’t admit they are wrong.

This thread is the only thread started specifically to discuss implications of banning offensive content in the Padded Room. Did you want to try again?

[Cosmic Suncloud]

.....because what ski forum is not primarily about jerking off?

exactly.
if you keep your expectations tiny, in the end you won't be so whiny.

[pfluffenmeister]

Attachment 216158

Whoa!
Poor one armed defender gets punched in the face, t-bagged, and dunked over by Mr Armcock.

[Supermoon]

This thread is the only thread started specifically to discuss implications of banning offensive content in the Padded Room. Did you want to try again?

Sure but there’s the SFW Ullr thread, the show your man junk thread and a couple of others. Plus every other thread with butthurt comments (even doggie stoke).

[shroom]

i will only read what the overlords feed me

where is my insulin?

[Mazderati]

Sure but there’s the SFW Ullr thread, the show your man junk thread and a couple of others. Plus every other thread with butthurt comments (even doggie stoke).

I don't know about the comments but you suggested people complaining about mtngrl were starting a bunch of threads as some sort of retribution. mtngrl is the one who started the show your man junk thread and the SFW Ullr thread was started to support her.

[Supermoon]

I don't know about the comments but you suggested people complaining about mtngrl were starting a bunch of threads as some sort of retribution. mtngrl is the one who started the show your man junk thread and the SFW Ullr thread was started to support her.

Ok, so maybe not tons of threads started, but the butthurt is real strong with a bunch of PR folks and it’s permeated everywhere. Fucking embarrassing display. Just so they can see some creeper picks.

[iceclimb]

Anyone remember when Mitch nuked ff topic at Telemarktips? This has that vibe.

[JayPowHound]

Is anyone beating off to pictures posted in the PR?


Anyone?



Beuller..?


Wanker...?








Didn't think so.

[willywhit]

No. But we are eager to learn

shut the fuck up, you fucking fuck

[DaHeel]

Simple really!
"Tits or GTFO"
-Makers 2000 whatever

[The AD]

The claims of "just don't look at it" are BS. It is no different than any other bigoted excuse for hostile environments. Including racist ones. I mean hey, stay at the other end of the restaurant or the back of the bus. Sure, we can have 2nd class citizens who are cut out of the total life of the community.. I mean why not - because what ski forum is not primarily about jerking off?

Totally disagree. It's the difference between censorship and self-policing. We're perfectly capable of calling out those who deserve it. Who exactly is getting "cut out" here?

[Vt-Freeheel]

Is anyone beating off to pictures posted in the PR?


Anyone?



Beuller..?


Wanker...?








Didn't think so.

This is what I find amusing. Some clowns think anytime a man sees a picture of a naked woman they whip it out and rub one out. Really not the case.

[Flyoverland Captive]

Anyone remember when Mitch nuked ff topic at Telemarktips? This has that vibe.

Yeah, I remember. But I don’t think Mitch was getting much ad revenue at that point, so losing some members was no big deal. TGR might take a different view.

[neufox47]

I feel like this belongs

Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.

This is a developed recap from what I’ve been saying in various comments here and there in the last two years or so. as a radfem I’ve always said PIV is rape and I remember being disappointed to discover that so few radical feminists stated it clearly. How can you possibly see it otherwise? Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.

As FCM pointed out some time ago, intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death (See factcheckme.wordpress.com for her work on the reproductive harms of PIV, click on the “intercourse series” page or “PIV” in the search bar). If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy. PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.

If we look at the act in more detail (skip this parag if you can’t take it), PIV is a man mounting on a woman to thrust a large member of himself into her most intimate parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked, banging himself against her with the whole weight of his body and hips, shaking her like he would stuff a corpse, then using her insides as a receptacle for his penile dejection. How is this a normal civilised, respectful way to treat anyone? Sorry for the explicit picture, but this is what it is and it’s absolutely revolting and violating.

The term “fuck you” is not an insult for nothing, men know why – it’s the worst thing you can do to a human being. It is in itself an extremely physically invasive act, very often painful, generally at the beginning before the pain may be cut off by the genital arousal; causes all sorts of tears, bruises, swelling, discomfort, STDs, vaginal infections, urinary infections, genital warts, HIV and death. Not to forget the additional sado-gynecological interventions/ costs of PIV-maintenance, and all the secondary physical mutiliation and financial costs that go with our duty to make ourselves look decorative for male sexual consumption – such as hair removal, make-up, starvation or forced feeding, torturous limb deforming or cutting up, etc.

The fact intercourse causes so many infections and tears and warts attests to the unnaturalness of intercourse, that it’s not meant to be. The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth. They are two muscle tissues / sphincters pressed against each other to help the baby be pushed out. Penetration of the penis into the vagina is completely unnecessary for conception.

There’s a reason men need to groom us into it, and why this grooming takes so long- because it’s so grossly violating and traumatising that we would otherwise never submit to intercourse. The only reason we may now not feel raped or have the impression we desired or initiated PIV, is because men broke down our barriers very skillfully and progressively from birth, breaking down our natural defences to pain and invasion, our confidence in our own perceptions and sensations of fear and disgust that tell us male sexual invasion is painful, harmful and traumatic.

Through an all-pervasive and powerful male propaganda, they stuff our minds from infancy with the idea that PIV is normal, desirable and erotic, before we can even conceive of it as something horrifying, and make sure we never see any alternative to their lie – or that if we do, we can no longer take in the information, are punished for thinking and saying otherwise. The fact we may not immediately feel raped doesn’t mean it’s not rape, objectively speaking. To give a classic example, many women in prostitution may not identify the act of prostitution as rape, except if the act wasn’t paid for. It doesn’t stop us from saying that all prostitution is rape. We know that our subjective feelings or thoughts may be colonised by men’s perspectives and as radical feminists we don’t let that override and erase the objective reality of violence. (PS -The reason why ONLY the lack of payment is defined as rape is because the offence here isn’t against the prostituted woman but the pimp who was deprived of his income. Rape comes from rapt, which is an old word for theft of woman-as-property.)

Lastly, from a structural point of view, as a class oppressed by men, we are not in any position of freedom to negotiate what men do to us collectively and individually within the heterocage. Men, by whom we are possessed, colonised and held captive, are the sole agents and organisers of PIV. Men dominate us precisely so we can’t opt out of sexual abuse by them; intercourse is the very means through which men subordinate us, the very purpose of their domination, to control human reproduction.

[Tri-Ungulate]

Meh. In Mtngirls defense, the Ullr thread has lost its tongue in cheek / "here's my gf with a few well placed Alta stickers" feel and now has like an upskirt/rapey vibe. It's gotten much creepier.

Buried on page 1, but QFT. I think that was mg79's main beef, she can correct me if I'm mistaken. Somehow her call for accountability in re: consensual vs. nonconsensual nekkid chick pics has the excitable GamerGate 4chan wannabee Men's Rights snowflakes acting like she wants no pr0n on TRG forever more, getting 'em so worked up they wanna ban her. Pathetic.

[MagnificentUnicorn]

Buried on page 1, but QFT. I think that was mg79's main beef, she can correct me if I'm mistaken. Somehow her call for accountability in re: consensual vs. nonconsensual nekkid chick pics has the excitable GamerGate 4chan wannabee Men's Rights snowflakes acting like she wants no pr0n on TRG forever more, getting 'em so excitable they wanna ban her. Pathetic.

I think that may be an oversimplification of why people want her banned. It's not her message it's the delivery of that message. That said, she's no worse than the constant haranguing and scolding soap box rants others bring to the table.

I don't care if she's banned or not and I don't care if the owners of this forum decide that they don't want porn on here anymore. None of it really matters. There's really no victims here.