Results 26 to 50 of 178
-
11-12-2017, 03:46 PM #26
-
11-12-2017, 03:52 PM #27Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
What is the likelihood consent was given?
What are the potential consequences if the wrong person sees the pictures? Once something is on the internet, there is no going back.
Is it fair to place your enjoyment of the thread over the risks of the potentially unwilling and unknowing participates?
These questions aren't for you, though.
I know tgr is populated by a lot of assholes.
I want know what TGR the company thinks.
-
11-12-2017, 03:57 PM #28
-
11-12-2017, 04:03 PM #29Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
We cannot know if consent was given. Unless the person is posting pictures of themselves and even then, we can't really know it is really them.
My question, which was never answered...
Since we cannot know if consent was given, and it's not uncommon for intimate photos to be shared without consent, is it worth it?
All the potential harm that could come over the nude pictures being seen by the wrong person?
-
11-12-2017, 04:06 PM #30
-
11-12-2017, 04:10 PM #31
I have nudes I can post up if anyone wants to see !
-
11-12-2017, 04:12 PM #32Rod9301
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Squaw valley
- Posts
- 4,667
Listen, I'm not saying there posting these pictures is right. It's obviously wrong.
But the person getting harmed is the nude girl, so maybe she should be more careful who she hangs out with.
It's like crossing a street. You may be in the right, but you will be the one getting hurt, so maybe it's smarter to look out for cars.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using TGR Forums mobile app
-
11-12-2017, 04:16 PM #33Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
Personally, I don't see why there needs to be porn on a ski website, but realistically I do not see the line needing to be drawn that far in the sand.
-
11-12-2017, 04:20 PM #34Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
Well you enjoy that world where women are afraid to be intimate with anyone because anytime anything bad results, she shouldn't have been there!
She should have known he was a bad man!
How did she not know he hid camera on the dresser!
She wasnt she watching when he was snapping pictures with his phone! How dare she fall alseep naked after sex!
Seriously. Is that what you want?
-
11-12-2017, 04:21 PM #35
Apparently because:
1. skiing is a white man's sport
2. this is a white man's forum
3. white men like porn
4. if you are a female and disagree, then the response is "fuck off and go suck a dick"
5. if you are a male and disagree, you usually just say nothing
TGR has every right to exist and thrive in this form.Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 04:23 PM #36Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
And I have every right to scream about it!
-
11-12-2017, 04:29 PM #37
-
11-12-2017, 04:30 PM #38Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
11-12-2017, 04:44 PM #39
Is that all girl ski porn website still around. Just saying.
When it comes to sex, men are dogs. (locker room talk)“How does it feel to be the greatest guitarist in the world? I don’t know, go ask Rory Gallagher”. — Jimi Hendrix
-
11-12-2017, 04:52 PM #40
Guess TGR doesn't realize this is far more of a liability than someone saying Arc'teryx products aren't great.
-
11-12-2017, 05:03 PM #41
Once again...
I must've missed the part that dictates your participation here?
At what point were you told to read these posts or interact with the posters?
This is freedom of speech. Go elsewhere if you don't agree."I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road
Brain dead and made of money.
-
11-12-2017, 05:24 PM #42
Being a creeper ain't freedom of speech bobby stupid.
-
11-12-2017, 05:26 PM #43
No part of freedom of speech protections applies to a private internet board, that argument is very tired and very stupid.
-
11-12-2017, 05:36 PM #44
dude he didn't build a law school
-
11-12-2017, 05:42 PM #45
-
11-12-2017, 05:48 PM #46
You misconstrue Freedom for sole the benefit of what you want over what others want.
What matters more is what does TGR think? What is their corporate policy regarding a special reserved part this forum being a boys porn sharing freedom of speech internet platform at the expense of women in the sport? And women in general. If that is their policy then that is A-fucking-ok. That is their right. But they should have the balls to come out and say so.
Question to TGR management, not mods: is this forum primarily a white boys club where women who don't like the objectification of women* can either just ignore it or "fuck off and suck a dick" as Beer Drinker has suggested it is?
*edit, specifically the posting of previously non-public naked pictures of women without their consent, like in the Ullr thread.Last edited by neck beard; 11-12-2017 at 06:34 PM.
Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 05:59 PM #47
[is this forum primarily a white boys club where women who don't like the objectification of women can either just ignore it or "fuck off and suck a dick" as Beer Drinker has suggested it is?[/QUOTE]
« White Boys » hmm
-
11-12-2017, 06:12 PM #48
tgr management didn't give a shit about damian sanders so i wouldn't expect much.
-
11-12-2017, 06:13 PM #49
In another thread Beer Drinker defended some posts on TGR by saying:
https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...83#post5157683
I changed "males" to "boys". Because that is how some supposed men behave.Life is not lift served.
-
11-12-2017, 06:30 PM #50
Bookmarks