Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 182
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16,592
    Quote Originally Posted by mbillie1 View Post
    he was eventually banned fwiw (also I am not tgr management)
    haha. I DON'T THINK YOU ARE MANAGEMENT!! group hug for mbillie1.

    he was banned because a bunch of people got pissed and made a deal out of it. otherwise, it would have gone on ad infinitum.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    X=Z-BO
    Posts
    3,224
    Will someone post a dick pic in this thread please

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    god created man. winchester and baseball bats made them equal - evel kenievel

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeedashbo View Post
    Will someone post a dick pic in this thread please

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    damn you!

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,789
    Post them in the NSFW Ullr thread. Freedom of speech.
    Life is not lift served.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,619
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    Guess TGR doesn't realize this is far more of a liability than someone saying Arc'teryx products aren't great.
    That is absolute bullshit on many grounds.

    First, in this hypo mtngirl79 assumes that, "[w]e cannot know if consent was given." Now, holy fucking shit doesn't that apply to almost every picture on the internet?

    Now, dunfreelegaladvice seems to be implying that a private website owner, with no knowledge of any facts of the situation, and not hosting any illegal image could somehow in anyway be potentially liable for the picture subject's claimed damages to reputation or for intentional infliction of emotional harm is ludicrous without an overt act of extortion towards the subject of the image with demonstrable knowledge of the lack of consent.

    Do a little research on revenge porn laws that barely barely even provide a cause of action against the poster. 3rd party liability is ridiculous proposition given the facts of this hypo (what is more ridiculous is the actual facts, but that is just another spun out version of reality of the OP).

    I think mtngirl79 should calm her tits or find somewhere else to prosthelytize, or at the very minimum, cease all non-skiing related posting, which would be equally as effective.

    Secondly, posting one's opinion about the level of quality of a widget on a privately owned forum is just that; TGR is free to delete anything is so chooses either way.

    Oh, I guess that means every pic of every unsmart thing done, skiing or otherwise, found on this forum should deserve a congressional inquiry.

    OMG, I just saw a pro skier looking into a doorway reflection to make sure his tall T was acting tall in a photo on the internet. NS'er LAWSUIT COMMENCE!!!

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,619
    Quote Originally Posted by neck beard View Post
    Post them in the NSFW Ullr thread. Freedom of speech.
    1) that would be appropriate if it met the norms of this community which surround that thread (you better have taken it); and
    2) there is no right of free speech on a private internet forum.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    12,900
    Quote Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark View Post
    Do a little research on revenge porn laws that barely barely even provide a cause of action against the poster. 3rd party liability is ridiculous proposition given the facts of this hypo. . . .
    true

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    10,871
    MTM, making sense and shit. Will not be heeded, I bet.
    And I guess that I just don't know

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,945
    Quote Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark View Post
    That is absolute bullshit on many grounds.

    First, in this hypo mtngirl79 assumes that, "[w]e cannot know if consent was given." Now, holy fucking shit doesn't that apply to almost every picture on the internet?

    Now, dunfreelegaladvice seems to be implying that a private website owner, with no knowledge of any facts of the situation, and not hosting any illegal image could somehow in anyway be potentially liable for the picture subject's claimed damages to reputation or for intentional infliction of emotional harm is ludicrous without an overt act of extortion towards the subject of the image with demonstrable knowledge of the lack of consent.

    Do a little research on revenge porn laws that barely barely even provide a cause of action against the poster. 3rd party liability is ridiculous proposition given the facts of this hypo (what is more ridiculous is the actual facts, but that is just another spun out version of reality of the OP).

    I think mtngirl79 should calm her tits or find somewhere else to prosthelytize, or at the very minimum, cease all non-skiing related posting, which would be equally as effective.

    Secondly, posting one's opinion about the level of quality of a widget on a privately owned forum is just that; TGR is free to delete anything is so chooses either way.

    Oh, I guess that means every pic of every unsmart thing done, skiing or otherwise, found on this forum should deserve a congressional inquiry.

    OMG, I just saw a pro skier looking into a doorway reflection to make sure his tall T was acting tall in a photo on the internet. NS'er LAWSUIT COMMENCE!!!
    I'm laughing at people pulling non-great product comments but allowing perhaps non-consensual nude photos. And making money off "stalkers". It shows the bottom line is money, not "values".

    If I'm wrong, I'm ok with that and fuck you. I don't give a shit what the ski town legal fucksticks say, I think you people are assholes and always will. You do the same, I wear it as a badge of honor.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Juxtaposition
    Posts
    5,789
    "dunfreelegaladvice"... was pretty funny.
    Life is not lift served.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    10,871
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    I think you people are assholes and always will.
    I'm confused. Why are you here then? Looking to clean up the place?
    And I guess that I just don't know

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,945
    Quote Originally Posted by neck beard View Post
    "dunfreelegaladvice"... was pretty funny.
    that's the way this forum "works"

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    11,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeedashbo View Post
    Will someone post a dick pic in this thread please

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    Just sent you a PM, lover.

    Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app
    ¡Órale, vato!

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I'm confused. Why are you here then? Looking to clean up the place?
    Because you need someone to sell shit to.

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    10,871
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    Because you need someone to sell shit to.
    You lost me. But fuck off.
    And I guess that I just don't know

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    You lost me.
    I bought your ice axes. It's ok, you are old and like to perv on young tits Bob.

    I'm laughing at the "honest" board that pulls negative product reviews but allows all kinds of tit pics, including things w/o explicit consent. I think that's fucked up. If you don't, fuck you.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    6,948
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    I bought your ice axes.
    How's the curve of the shaft? Fits well in the hand?

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Imaginationland
    Posts
    3,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    You lost me. But fuck off.
    Lol. You said but fuck

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    10,871
    Quote Originally Posted by dunfree View Post
    ...
    Edit: Never mind. I went back and recognize you now.

    I've been preoccupied.
    Last edited by Meadow Skipper; 11-13-2017 at 06:12 AM.
    And I guess that I just don't know

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    PRB
    Posts
    21,260
    Quote Originally Posted by wyeaster View Post
    dude he didn't build a law school
    Ok, that's funny.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    PRB
    Posts
    21,260
    I would like to amend my last post, there's a lot of funny in this thread.
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    PRB
    Posts
    21,260
    And on the thread subject, I don't see how consent can or can't be proven for any photo, it's simply not workable. The rule certainly has to be no nude photos without subject consent, but proving it isn't posted with consent is virtually impossible. And the alternative, always assuming there isn't consent and eliminating them altogether, is kind of anathema to the history of this place. Where would TGR be without its redhead midget porn?
    "fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
    "She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vernon BC
    Posts
    1,675

    Nude photos without the subjects knowledge and or permissions

    Consent doesn't end with titty pics. elhefe posted pics of me shredding the gnar sans consent.

    And I am curious what TGR is gonna do about it.
    "Its not the arrow, its the Indian" - M.Pinto

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    16,592
    or, one could admit that sharing and olging porn on this site is not respectful to the women here. one could play with ones own porn in the privacy of their own home just as easily without offending anybody here by sharing and evaluating each others' fapping material.

    or another hand, one could admit that likely a vocal majority doesn't give a shit how women feel here in anonlandia and will object vociferously to the idea of not permitting porn.

    because, you know, we're animals and it's natural n shit.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    10,871
    Quote Originally Posted by cmcrawfo View Post
    Consent doesn't end with titty pics. elhefe posted pics of me shredding the gnar sans consent.

    And I am curious what TGR is gonna do about it.
    What are you wearing?
    And I guess that I just don't know

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •