Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 361
  1. #201
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,490
    Would 160 mm work better? Trail riding is the focus; city riding is not. Some city, sure. For various reasons, I'll take all the travel I can get in a bike that is still made to go uphill.

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,971
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Would 160 mm work better?
    Minimum 170 mm, dual crown fork up front. Or this:



    or this:


  3. #203
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    where the rough and fluff live
    Posts
    4,147
    Why not a $100 anybike for city errands, and then a trail bike for when you want to ride trails? I wouldn't want to be locking up my $2k+ bike in an errand-running situation, and then there's the complete waste of machinery compared to a $100 anybike for errand-running purposes.

    Of DTM's two options, the latter, the stride-a-lot fitness-walker-bike is clearly the superior tool.

  4. #204
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Minimum 170 mm, dual crown fork up front. Or this:

    or this:
    The first bike is like a metaphor for doing as little in life as possible. The second looks like it belongs in SkyMall or on QVC. Can I get back to you?

    ETA: The second picture is from Hammacher. Even better.

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    8,368
    My bar bike was $15 at a yard sale...a Trek even. Took it on a little vaca and the tire let go. Cost me $20 for a new tire!

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by creaky fossil View Post
    Why not a $100 anybike for city errands, and then a trail bike for when you want to ride trails? I wouldn't want to be locking up my $2k+ bike in an errand-running situation, and then there's the complete waste of machinery compared to a $100 anybike for errand-running purposes.
    Yeah, there's no way a nice bike is getting chained to a traffic sign which I think is one of Dan's points.

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    17,971
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Yeah, there's no way a nice bike is getting chained to a traffic sign which I think is one of Dan's points.
    That's one of the big ones. Listen, I ride to work every day possible and do all the errand running I possibly can via bike. I also ride my Reign 10+ miles RT on pavement frequently because there are a few trails I prefer to ride from home. Never ever ever has the thought crossed my mind to use the Reign for the urban stuff.

  8. #208
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    where the rough and fluff live
    Posts
    4,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    That's one of the big ones. Listen, I ride to work every day possible and do all the errand running I possibly can via bike. I also ride my Reign 10+ miles RT on pavement frequently because there are a few trails I prefer to ride from home. Never ever ever has the thought crossed my mind to use the Reign for the urban stuff.
    Ditto. I have 7 miles of mostly pavement to my furthest & most common trailhead destination, so 14 RT. I even have a 29er SS that feels more efficient on the cross-town pavement, but I ride the 26" trail bike 99% of rides. And wouldn't ever use the trail bike for errands.

    If you want max double-duty for your errand bike, mine is probably a $350 bike in cost (wheels expense mostly) but looks like nothing anyone would want. It's a singlespeed non-descript steel cyclocross bike with rim brakes. No issues locking it anywhere in my town. I can do trail rides on it, they're fun but a completely different type of fun compared to the trail bike.

  9. #209
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,165
    Quote Originally Posted by creaky fossil View Post
    It's a singlespeed non-descript steel cyclocross bike with rim brakes. No issues locking it anywhere in my town. I can do trail rides on it, they're fun but a completely different type of fun compared to the trail bike.
    "Type 3 fun"
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,008
    IMO/IME you don't need suspension for city/town/paths and roads, I took the front suspension fork off my mtn bike when I repurposed it as a touring bike

    my buddy has that style of recumbent in the pict and he sez its not that good around town because yer sitting down low/gotta bring the legs up to peddle so it sucks for the stop n go but what its good for is grinding out the touring KMS and so he has been gone for > 2yrs / 30,000 kms across Canada, down the eastern seaboard thru mexico , central america and I think the last FB post was in Boliva
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  11. #211
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    The only thing I'll be racing for is a beer at the end of a ride. Riding will be mostly trail and some running around the city.

    jono, you mentioned a list of less than desirable brands. Who would you include?
    I am doing a lot of riding on a bike with a Horst-link like that Nukeproof and it's a hell of a fun bike (at speed anyway). But I'm not convinced that I'd look for a Horst for long term use. Either a single pivot with giant bearings or another 4-bar that offers a big advantage over single pivot seems better.

    I have a short list of companies to avoid, others might add a few, but of course single data points can be kind of meaningless. Ellsworth comes to mind...but engineers aren't really allowed to like Ellsworth. I've also had the opposite experience with Santa Cruz service than many here, but it's probably luck and different people: I hear they basically disbanded their tour/demo group lately, so...I'll STFU on that. Not a product issue anyway. Other companies are maybe just too small/niche and don't speak to my desires. It's easier to say a model to avoid than a company, since most make different enough models to find some that aren't a good fit but others that would be.

    Have you ridden and liked (or hated) anything besides your current bike? I'll second the 140-150mm range; finding some downsides to a 160mm fork (though not enough to shorten it yet, personally) but I haven't felt like dropping to 120 vs. 140 or 150 is all that beneficial unless you can do it on the fly.

  12. #212
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    572
    Again get a nice hardtail for your purposes. My carbon epic rips my 40 mile round trip bike commutes to work with half pave half gravel rail bed, is an amazing light flickable capable trail bike. Zippy around town. Way Less maintenance than a boingo bike.

  13. #213
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    10,843
    post #9
    Hardtail is out of the question.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  14. #214
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    post #9
    Yes I know. But considering his intentions? Unless maybe he just wants to look cool or something. Not a troll, just trying to give sound reasonable advice here. Get a higher component spec for less money too. I only see wins here. Could always throw a thud buster or some such thing on it. With a 27.2 diameter post on my Epic it's amazing how much flex/comfort that I get out of that post.

  15. #215
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,340
    Your love of your own equipment is well documented, Rog.

  16. #216
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,490
    6' 4" 220 lbs., two hip scopes, and a sensitive taint. Suspension required.

  17. #217
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    Ellsworth comes to mind...but engineers aren't really allowed to like Ellsworth.
    Due to the rear-most pivot point? The Ellsworth Truth was a great looking bike back in the day.

  18. #218
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    6' 4" 220 lbs. and two hip scopes and a sensitive taint. Suspension required.
    Ok got it. DW link bikes like Pivot and Ibis would be my rec for best pedaling full sussy's

  19. #219
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,739
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMan View Post
    Again get a nice hardtail for your purposes. My carbon epic rips my 40 mile round trip bike commutes to work with half pave half gravel rail bed, is an amazing light flickable capable trail bike. Zippy around town. Way Less maintenance than a boingo bike.
    Recommending Special Ed?


  20. #220
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Due to the rear-most pivot point? The Ellsworth Truth was a great looking bike back in the day but it's obviously not the same company now.
    Debatable.

    But that's all it had going for it.


  21. #221
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,739
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMan View Post
    Ok got it. DW link bikes like Pivot and Ibis would be my rec for best pedaling full sussy's
    Also - look for designs with lower leverage ratios - otherwise your rear shock may have to have RETARDED amounts of pressure in it. Which can be problematic.

    Of course, if you go coil... you get extra cool-cred.

  22. #222
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Recommending Special Ed?

    Nah just a HT in general. If full suss, anything over 100mm travel for the OP's purpose seems silly to me. Like skis over 100mm underfoot for groomers, bumps, and shallow snow lol.

  23. #223
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    6,707
    If I was getting my first bike in a decade, I'd sure as shit want a full squish machine. Fuck the hardtail. You get back into biking, you want to experience the wonders of modern technology. If down the road you find that your real love is logging tons of XC miles and spinning your pedals until your taint is hard and calloused, by all means you'll know it's time for a hard tail. But in the beginning, everyone wants to feel like they're skiing powder when riding downhill.

    I'd avoid any Yeti. I've literally lost count of the number of people I know who've broken them. One friend has broken 3. I've seen 2 broken ones on trail rides. Carbon AND alloy. And I can't say that all reports were rosy in regards to dealing with their CS.

    I'd avoid Specialized. Partly because they're a shitty company. Partly because they build their frames really light and prone to breakage. And partly because of shit like that fucking yoke shock attachment. That said, lifetime warranty to original owner could be helpful.

    I'd avoid Intense. Loads of stories of breakage. Saw one that was broken in half. Not cracked, not dented. Front half & Back half held together by brake/shifter cables.

    Personally, I had a bad experience with Rocky. So many little parts in their bushing intensive rear linkage. Every single one of them was custom, and tiny. If one rolled under the workbench, or cracked, or whatever, bike was out of commission until you could convince a dealer (good luck finding one stateside) to order the bushing/hardware set for you for $150 bucks just so you could get one little plastic cone washer. Fuck that. I hear it's different now?

    I'd probably also avoid complicated rear linkages. Four Bar, Horst, Single Pivot Variations are great and ride great. Most of them are easy to work on and get bearings/parts for which means in 10 years you'll still have a great bike. Double or triple the number of linkage parts and make them all custom to that one sub-model of that one line from that one brand for that one year and shit is going to suck for you in the future when all you need is a weird bolt/nut/bushing combo thing but can't get it.
    However many are in a shit ton.

  24. #224
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,739
    Quote Originally Posted by 406 View Post
    <snip>
    I'd probably also avoid complicated rear linkages. Four Bar, Horst, Single Pivot Variations are great and ride great. Most of them are easy to work on and get bearings/parts for which means in 10 years you'll still have a great bike. Double or triple the number of linkage parts and make them all custom to that one sub-model of that one line from that one brand for that one year and shit is going to suck for you in the future when all you need is a weird bolt/nut/bushing combo thing but can't get it.
    You know, you make a lot of sense.

    Perhaps a Guerilla Gravity The Smash, Shred Dogg or Trail Pistol?

    Simple design. Standard hardware. Good specs at a given price point.

  25. #225
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    572
    Hahaha!

    So why no love for Specialized as a brand?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •