Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: G3 Sendr 112

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060

    G3 Sendr 112

    any body ski it yet ?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,754
    Also curious. Think it's a fatter Manhattan or a flattened and narrowed Empire 115 Carbon?

    http://blistergearreview.com/gear-re...8-g3-sendr-112

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    5,883
    4mm wider waist than the Manhattan, and I think a bit longer turn radius, would make a bitchin ride. They aren't so popular here it seems but I've loved every G3 I've skied or owned.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    I got a buddy who is waffling between the sendr and another wailer they sound like 2 very different skis, sounds like the Sendr is bigger turns/more fun if you can control it , I am trying to convince him to go Sendr
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    PeeGee
    Posts
    196
    A friend of mine here went from DPS to the Findr and couldn't be happier. ... That's all the two cents I've got. They look rad to me

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,754
    I'd also think those are very different skis, G3 tends to be stiff and burly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    PeeGee
    Posts
    196
    FWIW my friend is not a huge charger or anything and really likes them. I don't think he would enjoy a stiff and burly ski.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,131
    You know the Sendr and Findr are totally different fucking skis, right?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    well exactly^^ except they are both 112 underfoot

    dude is putting a lot on the blister review cuz the Sendr is brand new and there is not much info out there which is why I am asking

    so i pointed out that a larger turning radius should be more fun and he he is not some fucking dentist who need the wailer to make up for his lack of ski days
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    5,883
    well the sendr and the wailer are both 112, the findr is a different story altogether...

    I'm still hoping to one day get a 185 Synapse 109, that looks like such a fun ski

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    X
    Posts
    385
    Bump for more info?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    ya, he got the sendr and likes it
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    X
    Posts
    385
    Do you know where/when he likes it?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    well only one day so far and it happened to be a 70cm pow cycle

    but he didnt say anything bad ... I think we need more testing
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    X
    Posts
    385
    Jeez, poor guy, only a one dimensional test day...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,060
    Powder king is not that steep so 70cms of early season snow would have probably been bottomless/actualy too much snow but like I said he didnt say anything bad
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    nj / 'dacks
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    well exactly^^ except they are both 112 underfoot

    dude is putting a lot on the blister review cuz the Sendr is brand new and there is not much info out there which is why I am asking

    so i pointed out that a larger turning radius should be more fun and he he is not some fucking dentist who need the wailer to make up for his lack of ski days
    Findr is 102....

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mammoth Lakes
    Posts
    3,646
    Anyone skied the Sendr? How about the weight on the 181cm version?

    Looking for a directional, pow touring ski. I like "traditionally" mounted, damp skis traditionally. I did NOT like the 4frnt Raven. Love my old skook Atomic Atlas. Want a lighter version of that really
    He who has the most fun wins!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,284
    Bumping this as I am looking at a set of 195s with techtons for touring this winter that are for sale locally at a decent price.
    I am big (6'3" 205) and tend to ski fast and point skis when I can but also am super avy cautios and spend a lot of time in the trees. Terrain is mixed PNW and I have a northern BC trip booked for march. Favorite touring ski to date were original 191 lhasa but they were tele mounted and I am locked down now. Tend to like long radii and traditional mounts.

    Quiver is: Super Goat + goliath inbounds
    Currently some old semi custom 112s + ZG95s for touring, these would replace the 112s.

    Also considering some V8s that is think will be too turny or blowing the budget on new BGT 118x192 but that would be a stretch.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mammoth Lakes
    Posts
    3,646
    I can add that the 181cm Sendr weighs 1810g per ski (1815 and 1805 for my pair) Never got to ski them so can't add much else.
    He who has the most fun wins!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    395
    I'm currently obsessing over where to mount a pair of 195s I picked up over the summer. Mine come in at 2020g. They're stiff. Quite similar shape and profile to my old 196 Moment Governors, but definitely stiffer especially in the tail. I'm psyched. I might drill pivots first and see if they're any fun inbounds, castify them later. But MTNs on them would bring the weight down to a more reasonable place for bigger days... decisions are hard

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •