Page 31 of 64 FirstFirst ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 775 of 1600
  1. #751
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,465
    Thanks for the feedback!! Specially from Jason, love to hear more from anyone else with any skinny RX exp or thoughts... I don't see the BC as a resort DD charging machine although it does seem to be a stellar all around design that I might pick for a go to anywhere anyhow stick. Just not what I'm looking for in this build. I want something as burly and easy and competent as an RX while as easy as a wren and just a hair narrower
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  2. #752
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    SE Idaho
    Posts
    2,178
    Quote Originally Posted by PlayItLeo View Post
    ^^^^ Interesting. The copy you posted is from the “standard edition skis” section of the website but the copy from “custom skis” reads “The Standard Edition Backcountry is offered in a #2 flex,” with this being the copy for custom suggestions “Custom build your Backcountry for resort skiing in a MAP-fiberglass with a #3 or #4 flex.”


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Well, interestingly enough these skis showed up today and are clearly marked #2 flex on both the topsheet and the build spec sheet included even though they are noted as a #3 flex on the website and shown that way on the topsheet image. I wanted to provide some clarification since there is one pair of the stock 170cm BC left. Very nice looking skis!

  3. #753
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    SE Idaho
    Posts
    2,178
    I got some clarification from Keith. The 180 / 190 lengths are #3 flex for the standard build, 160/170 are #2 flex.

  4. #754
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    On the field
    Posts
    807

    2017 Praxis Skis Info and Resource Thread

    Follow up on my Piste Jibs. After a base grind and tune these are all that I wanted in a east coast daily driver so much fun and easy to ski all sizes of bumps they smear and lock in with just a touch of pressure and so easy to maneuver in the tightest of Vermont hardwood
    Very happy but wish they came out of the wrapper this wayClick image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3576.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	228131

  5. #755
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,516
    ^great looking set

    My 184 PJs are the perfect EC daily for me too

  6. #756
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Other Side
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by Self Jupiter View Post
    ^great looking set

    My 184 PJs are the perfect EC daily for me too
    X3

  7. #757
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    shadow of HS butte
    Posts
    6,438
    Adding to the above, after the full tune on my PJs they are a complete different ski for the better. Can actually lay down some carves finally and engaging/disengaging the edges in bumps is much more consistent.



    The RXs still dominate my quiver. They are eating everything in sight out here in BS in what I'd consider highly variable conditions. Best ski evar.

  8. #758
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    Sent an email to Keith about this over the weekend but he must be busy. Any mags know the answers?

    What's the sidecut oscillation on the yeti all about?

  9. #759
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,987
    I emailed Keith over a week ago. I know the guys busy but I have yet to hear back. I want to order some new 192 ProTest with a certain build and have questions. Anyone have another way to get in touch with them?

  10. #760
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    I'm in the same boat. When I previously emailed him his responses were lightning quick. I was planning on chilling until midweek when I'd resend my queries if still unanswered.

  11. #761
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    the Sierra is getting FEET of snow a day right now ... and it's Saturday ....

    I wonder why Praxis isn't answering email?

  12. #762
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,987
    ^ But I emailed them before snowmageddon...... not looking for a response today. He'll probably respond next week when the snow settles down and everyone has their fill of face shots! Super stoked the sierra is getting hammered.

  13. #763
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    the Sierra is getting FEET of snow a day right now ... and it's Saturday ....

    I wonder why Praxis isn't answering email?
    Good. I Hope they shred to their hearts content!

  14. #764
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    everyone has their fill of face shots!
    I've never heard such blasphemy! 😀

  15. #765
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,987
    Quote Originally Posted by santaclaus183 View Post
    I've never heard such blasphemy!
    Very true....

  16. #766
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    so Keith got back to me about the oscillation in the yeti sidecut. sounds reassuring in that apparently they backed it way off when they were first playing with adding it in.

    My question to yeti owners is does yours have the oscillation and if so how subtle is it? I owned a pair of lib tech skis and hated the magnetraction but subtle it was not. It sounds like Keith and his team had the same reaction as me to overdone oscillations so I guess I'm just looking for some confirmation from current users.

  17. #767
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,410
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    ^ But I emailed them before snowmageddon...... everyone has their fill of face shots!.
    My Praxis BC’s did well in 5’ of Sierra Pow yesterday, better than my touring poles which even with powder baskets basically went all the way, hand to surface of snow while skinning.


    Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer’s Wootests also seemed like they were decent for the conditions:


    Even MapleLeafGillies’ MVP’s showed that you don’t need a big bat to send it deep out of the park:


    Saturday 3/17 was a fine day to ski Praxis in the Sierra!!!
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  18. #768
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,101
    Damn, those are some sweet shots.

    I picked up a pair of used custom 9Ds -- heavy core with carbon and #4 flex. Just mounted them up tonight and, unlike Tahoe, conditions here are perfect for them. They have an excellent, consistently stiff hand-flexing feel.

  19. #769
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    My Praxis BC’s did well in 5’ of Sierra Pow yesterday, better than my touring poles which even with powder baskets basically went all the way, hand to surface of snow while skinning.
    Didn’t you get UL GPOs this season? Why the BCs for this huge storm then?

    Curious since I just got a pair of GPOs and am just awaiting some Tectons and skins to show up before I get to tour on them.

  20. #770
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by jorion View Post
    Didn’t you get UL GPOs this season? Why the BCs for this huge storm then?

    Curious since I just got a pair of GPOs and am just awaiting some Tectons and skins to show up before I get to tour on them.
    My old 190 bcs skied powder better than the 187 gpos I had for a while. And way better than my current skinny gpos. For me at least. YMMV

  21. #771
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,163
    In my experience, the pow performance of the GPO is mount dependent. On the dimple, it dives. -1 it floats well. No one here seems to complain about the pow performance of the BC.
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  22. #772
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,410
    Quote Originally Posted by jorion View Post
    Didn’t you get UL GPOs this season? Why the BCs for this huge storm then?

    Curious since I just got a pair of GPOs and am just awaiting some Tectons and skins to show up before I get to tour on them.
    Actually I got enduro-veneer GPOs (182) and mounted them -1 with Marker Lord binders. My 180 BCs have Speed Radicals on the dimple (which is really far back compared to other Praxis skis). I should have just gone with Kingpins on the GPO, but I was trying to keep it consistent with the rest of my quiver since my wife and I have inserts on all our skis.

    Would have been a more interesting choice this weekend if I had touring bindings on the GPOs ... at -1 I have yet to experience tip dive on them in very consistent and blower storm snow pow. They haven’t yet been in ultra deep multi-layer snow yet.

    I can say that the BC tip is very wide and hard to sink - the progressive and soft flex up there keeps the tip pretty high in the snow, and also I’m a really light skier. But I had a couple moments this weekend when the tips hooked up underneath variabilities in layer density in super deep snow and I went over the bars. I think Saturday was the first time I ever toured in 150cm of pow.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  23. #773
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,357
    I've owned 180 and 190 BC's (pretty sure both were on the line) and currently own 182 UL (at -1) and 187 GPO's (at -1.5). Tips probably stays up more on the BC's, but the GPO's are surfier/ more fun. I should note that I'm old enough to have skied plenty of pow on skinny skis and still enjoy it on occasion. I tend to consider problematic tip dive "user error." But if you want skis with utterly unsinkable tips GPO's are probably not the ski for you. Something more pintailed would be the right call.

  24. #774
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,041
    I tried searching the thread and I can't seem to figure it out but what is the Praxis spring sale? How much do a set of custom protests go for approximately and do you buy them now and they are ready by the Fall? Is that the deal that I seem to gather from the bits and pieces I could find on other sites? It was from a couple years ago so prices may have gone up I don't know but basically it said you can choose your core your Flex top sheet bottom Etc

    Sent from my VS987 using TGR Forums mobile app

  25. #775
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    523
    I think it starts this weekend. 50% off so the standard 1300 would be 650. Usually you can stack codes too so I PM’d you my loyalty code which should get you another 15% off.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •