Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    420

    Should the SEC step in and prevent more ski resort mergers?

    This is getting out of control. Clearly two entities are trying to get a monopoly on big resorts.

    I think this is un-American and do not want to see another one purchased by either of these entities.

    Literally Jackson Hole is the last major one standing; if that gets sold it's all over.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,043
    Yes, it's way past time to start enforcing anti trust. Capitalism requires competition or it becomes Corporatism.

    Yeah, I know, polyass.

    Vote with your dollar:CB, T'ride, Wolf Creek, Taos, etc.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,003
    "Capitalism requires competition or it becomes Corporatism."

    That
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,410
    Alta.... doubt they will get absorbed into anything.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,841
    It would be neat if the Forest Service would help establish more small local type hills.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane/Schweitzer
    Posts
    6,749
    That's not going to happen. The SEC has bigger fish to fry than the ski industry. In my former industry, there are two big players who control about 90% of the brands in the market. The other 10% are small, regional companies who offer some local competition. The reality is that the two big players are about evenly split in terms of market share and they compete fiercely. The consumer wins as the two bigs have the money to throw at improved efficiencies and the price of those products has remained relatively flat since 2005 while the products have become more diverse. The perception of what happens versus what's really happening are likely very different.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,566
    It'd be the FTC or DOJ.

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldMember View Post
    That's not going to happen. The SEC has bigger fish to fry than the ski industry.
    The SEC would be the regulatory body who investigate the new hedge-fund owners of former CNL lifestyle Properties

    Brighton Ski Resort, Utah
    Crested Butte Mountain Resort, Colorado
    Cypress Mountain, B.C., Canada
    Gatlinburg Sky Lift, Tennessee
    Jiminy Peak Mountain Resort, Massachusetts
    Loon Mountain Resort, New Hampshire
    Mount Sunapee Mountain Resort, New Hampshire
    Mountain High Resort, California
    Northstar-at-Tahoe Resort, California
    Okemo Mountain Resort, Vermont
    Sierra-at-Tahoe Resort, California
    Stevens Pass, Washington
    Sugarloaf Mountain Resort, Maine
    Summit-at-Snoqualmie Resort, Washington
    Sunday River Resort, Maine
    for corruption and bribery in their African blood mining interests.
    Last edited by PNWbrit; 05-09-2017 at 11:39 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    I-70 West
    Posts
    4,684
    The market will respond by upping visits to non Vail/KSL mountains, due to overcrowding, faux European villages, parking issues, etc. etc. long before the SEC is involved.
    Last edited by hatchgreenchile; 05-09-2017 at 11:24 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane/Schweitzer
    Posts
    6,749
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    It'd be the FTC or DOJ.
    Yeah, good point. FTC would be the agency and DOJ only if the FTC found illegal activity. Regardless, I don't see it happening.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,841
    Quote Originally Posted by hatchgreenchile View Post
    The market will respond by upping visits to non Vail/KSL mountains, due to overcrowding, faux European villages, parking issues, etc. etc. long before the SEC is involved.
    But what if there aren't any Non-Vail/KSL resorts left?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    under the hogback shadow
    Posts
    3,239
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldMember View Post
    That's not going to happen. The SEC has bigger fish to fry than the ski industry. In my former industry, there are two big players who control about 90% of the brands in the market. The other 10% are small, regional companies who offer some local competition. The reality is that the two big players are about evenly split in terms of market share and they compete fiercely. The consumer wins as the two bigs have the money to throw at improved efficiencies and the price of those products has remained relatively flat since 2005 while the products have become more diverse. The perception of what happens versus what's really happening are likely very different.
    Pepsi & Coke?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Leavenworth Skier View Post
    But what if there aren't any Non-Vail/KSL resorts left?
    No worries...Ski Hesperus and Hogadon will never sell-out.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane/Schweitzer
    Posts
    6,749
    No, much smaller industry, probably more akin to the ski industry.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    284
    Denver Post took a look at antitrust issues in the KSL-Aspen Skiing deal on Sunday

    http://www.denverpost.com/2017/05/07...rust-concerns/

    Previous antitrust concerns -- like the DOJ ordering Vail to ditch ABasin in its deal with Ralston in 97 -- revolved around a monopoly raising prices. The concern today, with season passes, is that a duopoly may price season passes so low that independent operators won't be able to compete with day tickets. Old Vern at Silverton weighs in on that issue.
    On first

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,043
    Quote Originally Posted by quienes? View Post
    Denver Post took a look at antitrust issues in the KSL-Aspen Skiing deal on Sunday

    http://www.denverpost.com/2017/05/07...rust-concerns/

    Previous antitrust concerns -- like the DOJ ordering Vail to ditch ABasin in its deal with Ralston in 97 -- revolved around a monopoly raising prices. The concern today, with season passes, is that a duopoly may price season passes so low that independent operators won't be able to compete with day tickets. Old Vern at Silverton weighs in on that issue.
    To wit:

    (from http://silvertonmountain.com/heli-sk...epic-pass-era/ linked by Meadow Skipper in another thread)
    :
    May 4, 2017
    Heli Skiing, Walmart, and The Epic Pass Era
    In case you have not heard, KSL recently purchased a multitude of big ski resorts adding to their extensive portfolio and is expected to follow the Vail Resorts Epic Pass model. Vail Resorts and KSL now own many of the best ski areas in the US, and follow a Walmart-style approach to skiing by selling very popular inexpensive season passes to the masses that provide a tremendous amount of skiing at all their resorts. On the surface, this seems like a huge win for skiers in the US with more skiing for less money and endless road trip possibilities with a single season pass. Not surprisingly, the Epic Pass is incredibly popular and driving record profits to Vail Resorts, which is why KSL wants in.

    Walmart is also quite popular and profitable by focusing on selling at a high volume which allows them to offer the lowest prices. Walmart is always busy, and so is Vail Resorts.
    If you don’t care about massive crowds, then the Vail Resorts model is a great thing for skiing. If you are a mid-sized or small ski area that is reliant solely on skier revenue to make ends meet, the Vail Resorts model presents several challenges. Typically, when a new Walmart opens, it puts pressure on the smaller independent hardware and grocery stores. The smaller stores cannot compete on pricing and many go out of business. The hardware or grocery stores that offer a unique or boutique product continually adapt and survive, and many even thrive by offering products that Walmart cannot. Perhaps it’s a unique birdfeeder that sells well and keeps the small business open.

    Mid-sized and small ski areas struggle in the Epic Pass era as they can no longer sell enough lift tickets or season passes at their actual value. It becomes impossible for independent ski areas to price their tickets at what it costs to provide the product, let alone make a profit. Mid-sized ski areas that have other profit centers, such as lodging, food and beverage, continue to do get by as best they can, but it gets harder every year to compete with Vail Resorts.

    For ski areas that are strictly reliant on skier revenue, it’s even more challenging. The Vail Resorts/KSL model has effectively devalued lift tickets, as many people scoff at paying for skiing at window rates when their Epic Pass covers so many areas. Why would anyone pay for a day ticket during a road trip when a cheap season pass comes with so many places to road trip to?

    At Silverton Mountain, the Vail Resorts/KSL model has put pressure on the ski area to adapt every season. Initially, Silverton Mountain offered season pass holders a bunch of free days at other premier ski areas through pass partnerships, and they sold well. As other independent ski areas adapted to the Epic Pass era, the Mountain Collective and MAX Passes sprouted up as many mid-sized resorts banded together to try to compete with Vail Resorts. Silverton Mountain cannot accept the volume of skiers that the Mountain Collective brings with it, and because of this, this ski area lost many season pass partners over the past five seasons.

    Without sufficient season pass and day ticket revenue to cover costs, Silverton Mountain’s unguided season was slowly reduced and eventually the ski area had to make major changes to unguided skiing based on the financial reality of the current market. Silverton Mountain can no longer sell enough unguided passes at a price people are willing to pay to cover the rising costs of doing business. Silverton Mountain loved these early additional unguided days as much as you. When people ask, “why not more unguided skiing?” or “why the need for heli skiing?” the answer is more complicated than one initially might imagine.

    Luckily, Silverton Mountain has other popular products to offer, like guided skiing and heli skiing, which allows the ski area to continue operating. These products are what keep the 45 amazing employees working at this ski area. These products are the unique birdfeeder that keep the mountain operating in the Epic Pass era. The opportunity to ski at an independent ski area shrinks every year, and the Vail Resorts/KSL/Walmart model is only one of the major contributing factors.

    In regards to heli skiing, there is so much misinformation being circulated regarding Silverton Guide’s recent heli approval that it is impossible to explain it all. But the most common misconception is heli skiers will be dropped above backcountry skiers, and the heli will be detonating explosives above them, both of which are simply not true. Silverton Guides has been operating heli skiing for many years in Silverton and San Juan County in areas much closer to popular backcountry areas, including Red Mountain Pass, and has never placed heli skiers or explosives near touring skiers. Silverton Guides has always been a good neighbor, and will continue to be so for every season to come.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    关你屁事
    Posts
    9,624
    Medium/Small ski areas can charge what customers value the experience at, they just can't make money at that price. This trend has been going on long before the current Epic Pass merger shitstorm of the 2010s.

    If the DOJ isn't interested in the emerging WalMart/Amazon duopoly, with more far reaching consequences, I doubt they'll touch ski areas.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A LSD Steakhouse somewhere in the Wasatch
    Posts
    13,235
    if you needs the fuckin guberment to solve your problems
    you gots real fuckin problems
    "When the child was a child it waited patiently for the first snow and it still does"- Van "The Man" Morrison
    "I find I have already had my reward, in the doing of the thing" - Buzz Holmstrom
    "THIS IS WHAT WE DO"-AML -ski on in eternal peace
    "I have posted in here but haven't read it carefully with my trusty PoliAsshat antenna on."-DipshitDanno

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,488
    Hey, I got real problems!


    Idk, like, I almost kinda wish VR would buy Snowbowl. They wouldn't, but a kid can dream.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    June Lake
    Posts
    2,625
    To put it in perspective, Vail Resorts and the new Aspen/KSL entity will now control about 35% of the total North American market between their 28 or so ski resorts.
    Last edited by enlosandes; 05-10-2017 at 07:33 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    This is not the SEC's concern. The Department of Justice deals with anti trust issues, and, as we have seen over the last 24 hours, they have much bigger fish to fry.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    There's No 666 in Outer Space
    Posts
    666
    Sounds like SOCIALISM to me.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    N@
    Posts
    394
    Sounds like I need to quit my day job and get into the unique birdfeeder business

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Everytime I see this thread I just think Roll Tide

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,040
    Quote Originally Posted by hatchgreenchile View Post
    The market will respond by upping visits to non Vail/KSL mountains, due to overcrowding, faux European villages, parking issues, etc. etc. long before the SEC is involved.
    I'm with Hatch on this one. :Crosses fingers that Aspen/Snowmass will still be lineless:

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,566
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    the new hedge-fund owners of former CNL lifestyle Properties



    for corruption and bribery in their African blood mining interests.
    http://www.concordmonitor.com/sunape...-sale-10567921

    State calls for public meeting amid concerns over Mount Sunapee ski lease

    After bribery schemes in Africa led the U.S. government to fine the new operator of Mount Sunapee Resort $412 million last year – one of the biggest penalties ever issued under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act – the New Hampshire attorney general wants to hold a public information meeting about plans for the resort.

    The resort is part of Mount Sunapee State Park, but ski operations are run by private companies under a lease. That lease was sold recently by its previous owner, Florida-based real estate investment trust CNL, to New York hedge fund Och-Ziff. The sale was part of a reported $830 million deal involving a number of other ski areas, including Okemo in Vermont and Sunday River and Sugarloaf in Maine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •