Results 951 to 975 of 1129
Thread: Amazon Prime Instant Video Rec
-
09-11-2022, 08:52 AM #951Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,677
I was a hudge LOTR fan as a kid. I loved the old animated Hobbit/LOTR movies. Read the books many times. All that. Maybe I'm just too old now, but the new movies and shows just don't do anything for me. Too polished, too weird, never how I pictured any of it in my mind. I think I'm just more of a fantasy book reader than I am a movie watcher.
Cool seeing NZ in the background though, as I spent time there when they were filming the original movies and stuff. Need to get back.
-
09-11-2022, 10:24 AM #952
I strongly disagree on the Films. They are not perfect, but easily in the 8 to 9 out of 10 range concerning book Adaptions. ( only the expanse gets a 10 from me)
The series ( until early episode 2) is just lavish landscapes and expensive cgi.
The dialouge is corny sometimes. No character really gets me to feel for him and the proto Hobbits are just plain annoying. And I don't see a real Story arc except " the ominous return of evil". Or something or ....?
The wokeness or short hair cut Elves don't bother me, but I'm not a due hard Fan.It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
-
09-11-2022, 10:48 AM #953
Amazon Prime Instant Video Rec
For me the latest iteration is trying too hard to hide characters from us. Remember Sauron created all but the one ring with the help of the elven smiths. Also, the realms of man, with the exception of Númenor, seem so much more diminished than I recall from the text, where it was stated several times that men multiplied and created/destroyed their kingdoms on a frequent basis. Perhaps the screenwriters are trying too hard to bring in mystique for the non-readers of the series that feels too forced to those that have a good grasp of the canon.
-
09-11-2022, 06:01 PM #954Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
I came to Tolkien relatively late (SF for boys, fantasy/fairy tails for girls; what can I say - young and stupid), and never got that invested. I came into the prequel with low expectations, in part because The Hobbit was just sad. So far I've been pleasantly surprised. Agree though, the first and early second episodes was pretty shakey. The whole obnoxious rope scene on the raft was horribly clumsy. Late second and third episodes definitely recovered nicely, though. I'm just taking it as a whole new story that may or may not have something to do with my vague memories of what may have been revealed in the LOTR core.
-
09-12-2022, 07:56 AM #955
The Hobbit movies are utter crap. I don't know what Jackson thought..... some sort of weird megalomania?
Still haven't watched. Episode 3 or finished 2. And I'm more curious about house of the dragon tbh. But rings is "free."It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
-
09-12-2022, 08:54 AM #956
Rings probably deserves its own thread?
Aim for the chopping block. If you aim for the wood, you will have nothing. Aim past the wood, aim through the wood.
http://tim-kirchoff.pixels.com/
-
09-12-2022, 09:43 AM #957
-
09-12-2022, 10:08 AM #958Aim for the chopping block. If you aim for the wood, you will have nothing. Aim past the wood, aim through the wood.
http://tim-kirchoff.pixels.com/
-
09-12-2022, 10:09 AM #959Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
-
09-13-2022, 10:10 PM #960
THE OUTFIT
This is a wonderfully taut psychological drama-cum-gangsters with guns-cum-noir-cum-one room neo thriller teeming with hints of Hitchcock, Mamet, and Tarantino.
Propelled by a stellar cast, some downright fantastic dialogue, and myriad twists, it is tightly knit and seamless. While some of the plot elements are ultimately predictable, they never feel forced or faux and often times they emerge with a sense of off-handed subtlety, having been obscured by the bravura acting and numerous sleight-of-hand red herrings. Lurking underneath the subdued action is a wonderfully complimentary score by Alexandre Desplat.
The whole film is as well-tailored as one of the bespoke suits cut by the lead protagonist.
RIYL
The early plays of David Mamet (think American Buffalo) as well as his early films; Reservoir Dogs; The Petrified Forest (1936)
-
09-14-2022, 10:01 AM #961Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
Agree 200%. Felt like a perfectly screen adapted play. Mark Rylance for the MFW.
-
09-14-2022, 10:14 AM #962
-
10-21-2022, 02:43 PM #963
Peripheral is pretty good so far. I might have to read a few gibson novels.
It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
-
10-21-2022, 05:34 PM #964Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
-
10-21-2022, 11:40 PM #965
-
11-09-2022, 10:57 AM #966Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
The English drops this Friday on Prime. Brutal/gritty western with Emily Blunt FTMFW
-
11-11-2022, 10:33 AM #967Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
-
11-16-2022, 07:05 PM #968Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
Finished The English several days ago, and had to ruminate a while. Started out not terribly impressed, having gone in with high expectations, but around the 3rd episode I felt myself being snagged and reeled in. Took a while to adjust to the time and character history jumps, but began to really appreciate how what seems to be so disconnected began to come together, building to a really good resolution. Be patient with this one, it's truly worth the effort.
-
11-20-2022, 11:31 PM #969
3 eps in and liking it enough to keep going.
Only complaint is that Ms Blunt looks like she spent several hours in makeup before each take: her lips are always ruby red and her cheeks rouged and skin almost alabaster smooth and clean whilst every other female character looks dirty, weathered, and actually like they’ve been riding horses and killing people all day…
There’s a wee bit of spaghetti sauce spattered throughout the title sequence animation and the first ep, but after that it kinda veers more traditional American western in look and tone ( though it does smack a bit of Tarantino at times, too).
-
11-21-2022, 10:23 AM #970Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
She weathers in nicely by the end; remember where she's coming from.
I was annoyed at the rather wasted inclusion of Hinds and Jones - almost throw away roles intended to draw in a more sophisticated viewer?
Be prepared for Spall, however - delightful!
-
11-21-2022, 01:03 PM #971
Spall?
As for THE ENGLISH, I enjoyed it for the most part. Heck, I binged it in one evening.
However…I was sorely disappointed in the Harlequin romance styled “forbidden love” angle and the reliance on the tired, outdated, and boring “White Savior” and “Noble Savage” tropes. Given the first episode, I was expecting something far more revisionist, but it ended up being like a Hallmark Midnight Madness effort (if Hallmark made romantic westerns with violence and mayhem, that is…).
Still, despite its many unnecessary flaws, it was an entertaining diversion.
-
11-21-2022, 02:50 PM #972Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 9,938
Rafe Spall is David Melmont, mr. nasty.
-
11-21-2022, 03:59 PM #973
-
11-21-2022, 04:06 PM #974
-
11-24-2022, 09:29 PM #975
Another recommendation for The Peripheral if you are into sci fi. Very different plot from thhe book… but apparently Gibson said it should be considered a separate and different work of art as if it lives in another stub. His books are great obviously if you are into that kind if stuff.
Bookmarks