Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10
Results 226 to 245 of 245
  1. #226
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by robnow View Post
    I’ve tried both 120 and 130. I weigh 190lbs and found quite a difference in flex between the two in the shop. The 130 I find to be a stiff boot, the 120 maybe close to, if not less than the Freetour 130s.

    Just checked Evo and they list a 200g difference between the two, almost all liner I assume.

    BTW, for me the small circumference of the stiff Grilamid lowers makes them very uncomfortable to get into but once they’re on, I’m finding them to be the smallest volume of any of this class of boot, excellent heel hold.
    Thanks for the comparison, sounds like I am on the right track with the 130, now evo just needs to get some more 28.5s

  2. #227
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Summit Park UT
    Posts
    793
    Leelau - did you put a size 27 Protour liner in your 27 shells, or did you go up a size like people sometimes do with Intuitions?

  3. #228
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,224
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    Thanks for the comparison, sounds like I am on the right track with the 130, now evo just needs to get some more 28.5s
    Ok, little revision. Tried all three tonight with the 120 liners. The Atomics are an impressively stiff and solid boot. Small difference in flex between the 120 and 130 and the 120 is stiffer than the Freetour 130. The Langes just distort so much through the plastic.

  4. #229
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden/Breckenridge
    Posts
    5,246

    Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD aka Hawk Extended aka HawX

    Quote Originally Posted by robnow View Post
    Ok, little revision. Tried all three tonight with the 120 liners. The Atomics are an impressively stiff and solid boot. Small difference in flex between the 120 and 130 and the 120 is stiffer than the Freetour 130. The Langes just distort so much through the plastic.
    Cold temps or room temps? Shouldn’t really judge by room temps. Plastics have different thermal properties. For example, on super warm summer days, I can bottom out my Cochise 130s on the buckles and I THINK they’re softer than my old 120s in the same temps (need to try em back 2 back). Not so for cold temps.

  5. #230
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,224
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    Cold temps or room temps? Shouldn’t really judge by room temps. Plastics have different thermal properties. For example, on super warm summer days, I can bottom out my Cochise 130s on the buckles and I THINK they’re softer than my old 120s in the same temps (need to try em back 2 back). Not so for cold temps.
    Yes, room temp...so in theory the 120 should stiffen up more relative to the other two in the cold.

  6. #231
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    3,497
    Quote Originally Posted by robnow View Post
    Ok, little revision. Tried all three tonight with the 120 liners. The Atomics are an impressively stiff and solid boot. Small difference in flex between the 120 and 130 and the 120 is stiffer than the Freetour 130. The Langes just distort so much through the plastic.
    The Langes will stiffen up more in the cold than the Atomics. I have found the Hawx XTD and Ultra to have one of the least variances in boot flex over temperature ranges and the Langes to have one of the highest.

    Skiing both the Lange 130 Freetour and the Hawx XTD 130 at ~25 degrees F the Lange has more power and is harder to bottom out. The initial five-ten degrees is softer than the XTD 130, but it doesn’t fold over after 20deg of flex like the XTD.

    Freetour is an everyday resort sidecountry boot. The XTD is a freeride backcountry boot. I’d compare the Freetour against the Cochise and Freedom and compare the XTD against the ZeroG, MTN Lab, and Maestrale RS.

  7. #232
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    360
    ^Xavier, was the Atomic with stock liner? Do you think a more alpine style liner would help some?

  8. #233
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    9,857
    Quote Originally Posted by wilcox510 View Post
    Leelau - did you put a size 27 Protour liner in your 27 shells, or did you go up a size like people sometimes do with Intuitions?
    I put a sz 27 Protour in the sz 27 Atomic.

    Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

  9. #234
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    825
    First impression from just trying them on in my local shop. Acceptable flex and support for inbounds skiing, acceptable ROM for short tours, way too much volume to ever work for my skinny ankles.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #235
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    9,857
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    First impression from just trying them on in my local shop. Acceptable flex and support for inbounds skiing, acceptable ROM for short tours, way too much volume to ever work for my skinny ankles.
    The stock liner had as much support as a wet sock fwiw but that was apparently improved in production. Did you stick an Intuition in there? Curious

  11. #236
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    2,533
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    The stock liner had as much support as a wet sock fwiw but that was apparently improved in production.
    I was told they planned to use stiffer material in the front of the tongue and in the sole plus add a bit of thickness in the midfoot in the production liner.

    As far as I can tell, the stiffer material is for real but the production liner seems just as thin around the ankle, and the production boot actually weighed less than the prototype by a few grams.

  12. #237
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    I was told they planned to use stiffer material in the front of the tongue and in the sole plus add a bit of thickness in the midfoot in the production liner.

    As far as I can tell, the stiffer material is for real but the production liner seems just as thin around the ankle, and the production boot actually weighed less than the prototype by a few grams.
    Are you talking about the liner for the XTD 130 or the XTD 120?

    The sloppy fit around the ankle for XTD mentioned a few posts above contradictions some other opinions about the heel hold and ankle volume. How is the rear half of the boot for low volume feet?

    Lastly, is the ROM and weight of the XTD so much better that you guys would own them in addition to a Freetour XT 130? I skied the XT 130 LV with shims, heel lifts, footbeds, Booster straps, and Zipfits for inbounds duty about 50 days last season. They were awesome inbounds and slackcountry with those mods, but pretty heavy with poor ROM for all day or multi day tours.

  13. #238
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    2,533
    Quote Originally Posted by DGamms View Post
    Are you talking about the liner for the XTD 130 or the XTD 120?

    The sloppy fit around the ankle for XTD mentioned a few posts above contradictions some other opinions about the heel hold and ankle volume. How is the rear half of the boot for low volume feet?

    Lastly, is the ROM and weight of the XTD so much better that you guys would own them in addition to a Freetour XT 130? I skied the XT 130 LV with shims, heel lifts, footbeds, Booster straps, and Zipfits for inbounds duty about 50 days last season. They were awesome inbounds and slackcountry with those mods, but pretty heavy with poor ROM for all day or multi day tours.
    The 130. I consider the heel pocket of the Ultra 130 XTD with stock liner to be average in volume; it's fine on my foot. It's snugger than the 100mm Lange or the MTN Lab in the heel and midfoot. Similar to the Zero G Guide Pro in that area, though the Zero G is narrower in the medial midfoot under the maleolus (some people mistakenly think that is a tight heel fit).

    They are different boots. Better range of motion in both directions and weight give the Ultra XTD a distinct advantage for touring. Progressiveness of flex and stance give the XT Freetour an advantage for skiing downhill. I use the former primarily for touring with skis above 100mm in the waist and the latter primarily for lift skiing.

  14. #239
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    825
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    The stock liner had as much support as a wet sock fwiw but that was apparently improved in production. Did you stick an Intuition in there? Curious
    I tried the 120 with stock liners. My buddy / shop employee told me they’re the more substantial resort specific liners, compared to the 130. Didn’t try them with intuitions, as I wasn’t actually shopping, just goofing around on a grey day.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #240
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    308
    Lee, can the memory fit be done DIY with a heat gun or boiling the shells?

  16. #241
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    169
    I've struck out twice on 28.5 130s being in stock, but was told more shipments might be here this week. I am trying to get a set before a trip dec 1. These things are selling fast.

  17. #242
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    I've struck out twice on 28.5 130s being in stock, but was told more shipments might be here this week. I am trying to get a set before a trip dec 1. These things are selling fast.
    Where have you been looking? Local shops or online?

  18. #243
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by ffmedic84 View Post
    Where have you been looking? Local shops or online?
    Trying to buy local so I can have the shell memory fit done and I might need an extra punch after that too.

  19. #244
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    9,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevada29er View Post
    Lee, can the memory fit be done DIY with a heat gun or boiling the shells?
    I believe it can be done with both BUT the results will be uneven. At your own risk with new shells then if you wish

    Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

  20. #245
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    I believe it can be done with both BUT the results will be uneven. At your own risk with new shells then if you wish

    Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
    Yeah, I'm going to take them to a shop for molding, assuming it's needed. Pretty stoked to get into new AT boots after 6-7 years in Dynafit Titans, which I never could get really dialed in, shitty ROM, weight, etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •