Page 38 of 53 FirstFirst ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... LastLast
Results 926 to 950 of 1319

Thread: Fritschi Tecton

  1. #926
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    1,990
    Summit- yeah, in fact it happens way too much for me. I’m finding it more frequently when i fail to bring the skis inside to melt out each night. I’ve never done it before, but the tecton seem to require it. I believe its an icing problem, never happens to me when the skis went inside.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  2. #927
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    The little fins in the heel cup are probably missing the slots in the boot heel tech insert (or the slots are plugged with ice), which pushes back the binding heel. Or there's ice in the heel cup that prevents the boot from seating properly.

  3. #928
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,109
    Quote Originally Posted by Adrgha View Post
    I sprayed both the bindings and the rear part of my boots with silicone spray, and that fixed it - at least for a while. So it's definitely caused the forward pressure spring being compressed, which then makes the riser stick to the sticky rubber sole of the boot.

    On another note: Where can I buy brakes for these bindings? The 120 mm brakes are way too wide for the 124 mm skis I have them mounted on. The 110's would probably be more than wide enough.
    I have some extra brake arms that I think are the 110's $20+shipping. PM me
    TLDR; Ski faster. Quit breathing. Don't crash.

  4. #929
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    Quote Originally Posted by flowing alpy View Post
    happened to me once this past weekend, same thing. i cycled thru the heel motion a couple times and it clears. gotta be a wet snow icing thing cuz it’s not ever happened in the cold dry snow. i do bring these in each night, cuz well i really like em.
    The things I miss in a Continental snowpack
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  5. #930
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,708
    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    The things I miss in a Continental snowpack
    Heh, that and stability. I always knew Colorado was sketch but this year is a whole new level.

  6. #931
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Heh, that and stability. I always knew Colorado was sketch but this year is a whole new level.
    Its pretty normal snowpack actually. What isn’t normal is large amounts of snowfall hah

  7. #932
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Thought this was interesting, taken from Lars’ interview with Powder about CAST:
    https://www.powder.com/gear-locker/n...ot-performance

    “Releasability in tech bindings is a messy subject. I've figured it out over the years. The long and short of it is alpine bindings were created because of lower leg injuries—it was hurting the sport. The alpine binding ISO Standards did a good job at fixing that, but with the original tech bindings there was no injury prevention and they weren't designed around the forces and anatomy.

    There hasn't been more of an outcry because the sample numbers will never be near the numbers of alpine skiers, you need lateral release in the tech toe to prevent spiral fractures. There are a couple who are getting elastic travel and lateral release, so I think they're trying.”

  8. #933
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    Thought this was interesting, taken from Lars’ interview with Powder about CAST:
    https://www.powder.com/gear-locker/n...ot-performance

    “Releasability in tech bindings is a messy subject. I've figured it out over the years. The long and short of it is alpine bindings were created because of lower leg injuries—it was hurting the sport. The alpine binding ISO Standards did a good job at fixing that, but with the original tech bindings there was no injury prevention and they weren't designed around the forces and anatomy.

    There hasn't been more of an outcry because the sample numbers will never be near the numbers of alpine skiers, you need lateral release in the tech toe to prevent spiral fractures. There are a couple who are getting elastic travel and lateral release, so I think they're trying.”
    Good point.

    I think it is truly praisworthy what Fritchi/BD (Vipec/Tecton) and Salomon (Shift) have created plus the well intentioned efforts of La Sportiva (TR2).
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  9. #934
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    Not willing to go through 39 pages to find out: Is the (current) Hoji compatible with the tecton?

    If someone can provide me with a list of incompatible boots, I could add that to the first post to prevent further questions like this.

  10. #935
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    Don't remember where it was published (Powder online maybe), but recently read an article about Vipec/Tecton technology where the author was thrilled with the "safety" aspect of these bindings, as had just had his ACL repaired. Maybe someone should tell him bindings that don't release laterally at the heel contribute to torn ACL's, lol. Pick your poison.

  11. #936
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,304
    Google to the rescue - hit 1 and 3: key take away - compatible, but perhaps not recommended.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2019-03-17 kl. 20.15.23.png 
Views:	85 
Size:	615.3 KB 
ID:	274532Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Skjermbilde 2019-03-17 kl. 20.15.33.png 
Views:	79 
Size:	192.7 KB 
ID:	274533
    Source: https://www.blackdiamondequipment.co...ts_2017-18.pdf

    WildSnow does some testing and a' and b'ing with other boots: https://www.wildsnow.com/25175/dynaf...ipec-fritschi/

  12. #937
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,478
    Buddy on tectons broke the forward release mechanism on first tour. All that forward release stuff popped out. He kinda got the bidding back together, but bits of plastic will end up in the ocean. Point is, I was not impressed with the toe. It has many little sensitive parts that are waiting to grenade when the binding is full of spring snow. The old toe was way simpler but worked well.

  13. #938
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,478
    First pic is the broken binding

  14. #939
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by daught View Post
    Buddy on tectons broke the forward release mechanism on first tour. All that forward release stuff popped out. He kinda got the bidding back together, but bits of plastic will end up in the ocean. Point is, I was not impressed with the toe. It has many little sensitive parts that are waiting to grenade when the binding is full of spring snow. The old toe was way simpler but worked well.
    What did your buddy do to break the toe?

  15. #940
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,478
    Fell on the skin track.

  16. #941
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    What the hell is going on with these brakes on these things? I bought new (overpriced) 110 mm brakes, hoping to get a snug fit over my 124 mm skis, but these things actually measure over 120 mm at the narrowest point. Additionally they don't retract much, if anything, making them stick out and catch on stuff all the time.

    Do I really have to get 100 mm brakes for my 124 mm skis?

  17. #942
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    523

    Fritschi Tecton

    Quote Originally Posted by Adrgha View Post
    What the hell is going on with these brakes on these things? I bought new (overpriced) 110 mm brakes, hoping to get a snug fit over my 124 mm skis, but these things actually measure over 120 mm at the narrowest point. Additionally they don't retract much, if anything, making them stick out and catch on stuff all the time.

    Do I really have to get 100 mm brakes for my 124 mm skis?
    I think there is just a ton of inconsistency. I have some 100 mm brakes that fit decently well over my 95 mm skis. Sure they’re a little big but not the issue some are having here.

    Would need a fair amount of bending for a 124 mm ski

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #943
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Adrgha View Post
    What the hell is going on with these brakes on these things? I bought new (overpriced) 110 mm brakes, hoping to get a snug fit over my 124 mm skis, but these things actually measure over 120 mm at the narrowest point. Additionally they don't retract much, if anything, making them stick out and catch on stuff all the time.

    Do I really have to get 100 mm brakes for my 124 mm skis?
    Those can't be 110's, my 110's needed a bit of grinding to fit over Helio116.

  19. #944
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by 1000-oaks View Post
    Those can't be 110's, my 110's needed a bit of grinding to fit over Helio116.
    Came wrapped in plastic that says 110 mm on it. How hard can it be to get brake sizes right?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20190328_210008.jpg 
Views:	67 
Size:	1,000.0 KB 
ID:	276318

  20. #945
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by Adrgha View Post
    Came wrapped in plastic that says 110 mm on it. How hard can it be to get brake sizes right?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20190328_210008.jpg 
Views:	67 
Size:	1,000.0 KB 
ID:	276318
    Maybe a stupid question, but did you mount them on the heel piece or just hold them up to the ski? I ask because when I got some 90mm brakes to replace my 100mm, they looked exactly the same as the 100 brakes until I swapped out a pair. When mounted to the heel piece the arms get compressed a bit. I had to dremel off some of the 90mm brake so they didn't get caught up on my 99mm skis when deployed. I agree that Fritschi brakes do not retract much, a lousy design for sure.

  21. #946
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,708
    The reach is a bit narrower when actually installed on the binding on the ski, since the arms get pinched lower down, pulling them inwards, IIRC.

  22. #947
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Hmm right, I didn't actually think of that. The brakes that are on there now measure the exact same as these new ones when deployed. I don't know what the width of the brakes that came on the bindings is supposed to be as I bought them used.

    I'll try to mount them on the heel piece and see if that makes a difference.

  23. #948
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    Mounted width is way different than unmounted.

  24. #949
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    270
    If you haven't mounted Vipec or Tecton brakes, it is a little tricky. Here's a good video....Tecton starts about a minute in....

  25. #950
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Thanks guys. Maybe I'm just a big 'ol idiot. I'll update tomorrow after mounting them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •