Results 926 to 950 of 1319
Thread: Fritschi Tecton
-
03-11-2019, 08:33 AM #926
Summit- yeah, in fact it happens way too much for me. I’m finding it more frequently when i fail to bring the skis inside to melt out each night. I’ve never done it before, but the tecton seem to require it. I believe its an icing problem, never happens to me when the skis went inside.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR ForumsGravity always wins...
-
03-11-2019, 12:39 PM #927
The little fins in the heel cup are probably missing the slots in the boot heel tech insert (or the slots are plugged with ice), which pushes back the binding heel. Or there's ice in the heel cup that prevents the boot from seating properly.
-
03-11-2019, 12:42 PM #928Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 1,109
-
03-12-2019, 06:58 PM #929Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
-
03-12-2019, 07:17 PM #930
-
03-12-2019, 07:20 PM #931
-
03-13-2019, 08:40 AM #932
Thought this was interesting, taken from Lars’ interview with Powder about CAST:
https://www.powder.com/gear-locker/n...ot-performance
“Releasability in tech bindings is a messy subject. I've figured it out over the years. The long and short of it is alpine bindings were created because of lower leg injuries—it was hurting the sport. The alpine binding ISO Standards did a good job at fixing that, but with the original tech bindings there was no injury prevention and they weren't designed around the forces and anatomy.
There hasn't been more of an outcry because the sample numbers will never be near the numbers of alpine skiers, you need lateral release in the tech toe to prevent spiral fractures. There are a couple who are getting elastic travel and lateral release, so I think they're trying.”
-
03-13-2019, 10:00 AM #933
-
03-17-2019, 11:49 AM #934
Not willing to go through 39 pages to find out: Is the (current) Hoji compatible with the tecton?
If someone can provide me with a list of incompatible boots, I could add that to the first post to prevent further questions like this.
-
03-17-2019, 12:03 PM #935
Don't remember where it was published (Powder online maybe), but recently read an article about Vipec/Tecton technology where the author was thrilled with the "safety" aspect of these bindings, as had just had his ACL repaired. Maybe someone should tell him bindings that don't release laterally at the heel contribute to torn ACL's, lol. Pick your poison.
-
03-17-2019, 01:19 PM #936Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2017
- Posts
- 2,304
Google to the rescue - hit 1 and 3: key take away - compatible, but perhaps not recommended.
Source: https://www.blackdiamondequipment.co...ts_2017-18.pdf
WildSnow does some testing and a' and b'ing with other boots: https://www.wildsnow.com/25175/dynaf...ipec-fritschi/
-
03-18-2019, 08:29 AM #937Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,478
Buddy on tectons broke the forward release mechanism on first tour. All that forward release stuff popped out. He kinda got the bidding back together, but bits of plastic will end up in the ocean. Point is, I was not impressed with the toe. It has many little sensitive parts that are waiting to grenade when the binding is full of spring snow. The old toe was way simpler but worked well.
-
03-18-2019, 11:39 AM #938Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,478
First pic is the broken binding
-
03-18-2019, 08:19 PM #939Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2018
- Posts
- 33
-
03-18-2019, 08:45 PM #940Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,478
Fell on the skin track.
-
03-28-2019, 12:01 PM #941Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 306
What the hell is going on with these brakes on these things? I bought new (overpriced) 110 mm brakes, hoping to get a snug fit over my 124 mm skis, but these things actually measure over 120 mm at the narrowest point. Additionally they don't retract much, if anything, making them stick out and catch on stuff all the time.
Do I really have to get 100 mm brakes for my 124 mm skis?
-
03-28-2019, 12:11 PM #942
Fritschi Tecton
I think there is just a ton of inconsistency. I have some 100 mm brakes that fit decently well over my 95 mm skis. Sure they’re a little big but not the issue some are having here.
Would need a fair amount of bending for a 124 mm ski
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
-
03-28-2019, 01:42 PM #943
-
03-28-2019, 01:54 PM #944Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 306
-
03-28-2019, 02:24 PM #945
Maybe a stupid question, but did you mount them on the heel piece or just hold them up to the ski? I ask because when I got some 90mm brakes to replace my 100mm, they looked exactly the same as the 100 brakes until I swapped out a pair. When mounted to the heel piece the arms get compressed a bit. I had to dremel off some of the 90mm brake so they didn't get caught up on my 99mm skis when deployed. I agree that Fritschi brakes do not retract much, a lousy design for sure.
-
03-28-2019, 02:29 PM #946
The reach is a bit narrower when actually installed on the binding on the ski, since the arms get pinched lower down, pulling them inwards, IIRC.
-
03-28-2019, 02:37 PM #947Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 306
Hmm right, I didn't actually think of that. The brakes that are on there now measure the exact same as these new ones when deployed. I don't know what the width of the brakes that came on the bindings is supposed to be as I bought them used.
I'll try to mount them on the heel piece and see if that makes a difference.
-
03-28-2019, 02:39 PM #948
Mounted width is way different than unmounted.
-
03-28-2019, 02:47 PM #949
If you haven't mounted Vipec or Tecton brakes, it is a little tricky. Here's a good video....Tecton starts about a minute in....
-
03-28-2019, 04:16 PM #950Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 306
Thanks guys. Maybe I'm just a big 'ol idiot. I'll update tomorrow after mounting them.
Bookmarks