Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Jury clears snowboard maker in liability suit

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    111

    Jury clears snowboard maker in liability suit

    http://www.registerguard.com/news/20...dict.0529.html

    May 29, 2005

    Jury clears snowboard maker in liability suit

    The Associated Press

    PORTLAND - In what is believed to be the first liability verdict in the nation involving a snowboard manufacturer, a jury ruled a Swiss company was not to blame for the 2002 death of a young woman on Mount Bachelor.
    Frank and Ellen Svitek of Ambler, Pa., sued Nidecker of Rolle, Switzerland, after their daughter, Kate Svitek, 22, was trapped in a well of deep snow surrounding a tree and died on Feb. 8, 2002, at the central Oregon ski resort.

    The trial centered on the snowboard's bindings. Unlike ski bindings, which automatically release in a fall to prevent injury, snowboard bindings do not release.

    The Sviteks' attorney, Joseph Chaiken of Philadelphia, argued that nonreleasable bindings increase the risk of death if a snowboarder falls into a well of deep snow. Unable to kick off the board, a rider can become trapped in the snow and suffocate.

    But the attorney for Nidecker, Brad Stanford of Portland, argued nonreleasable bindings are safer overall because they allow the snowboard to act as an anchor when a rider falls.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The U of K
    Posts
    750
    Let's sue the ski patrol for not grooming the tree lines.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,833

    crazy skiers

    I don't wait for skiers who loose a ski on a powder day.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Unlike ski bindings, which automatically release in a fall to prevent injury...
    Not always, idiot. Plenty of skiers have died in tree wells, a maggot had a near miss not too long ago.

    This suit was yet another example of grieving parents filing a BS suit trying to find someone other than their child to blame. I empathise, but certainly don't sympathise.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Baconzoo
    I don't wait for skiers who loose a ski on a powder day.
    OK, but do you wait for skiers who lose a ski on a powder day?
    "Can't vouch for him, though he seems normal via email."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Logan, Utah.
    Posts
    2,053
    Thank god for a sane verdict.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    In the parking lot
    Posts
    1,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Twoplanker
    Thank god for a sane verdict.
    Agreed. There was a similar suit against Burton a number of years ago with a verdict that ruled in favor of Burton. That was over a death at Mt. Hood Meadows, again a rider who was caught in a tree well.
    The post mortem on Kate stated that she died almost instantly from suffocation due to snow being forced into her airway. It was and is a tragic accident and a great loss to those who knew Kate. It was and is nothing more.

    As Scot Schmidt said: "People who sue ski areas should be shot".
    The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches.
    ~ e.e. cummings

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •