Page 11 of 38 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 941
  1. #251
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    After a couple/few seasons with the canadian tire full winter tires on my 1/2 tonne, I decided to size down my wheels from 20" to 17" and get all weather tires to avoid having to change them.

    I bought Kumho Road Venture AT51 tires from 1010tires.com for a little over $600 Canadian including shipping.

    My subjective opinion is that they are just as good as the old full winters I had... in that they still slide a little on glare ice but everywhere else they're very confidence inspiring and I feel just as comfortable with them as my previous winters.

    I also add over $300 pounds of weight directly over the rear axle until about April to help with rear wheel traction.

    Sent from my SM-A505W using Tapatalk
    I think it was that 300lbs... Or your old winter tires sucked ass. These at51s do not compare to any snow tire I've driven in any slippery winter conditions.

    At51 are not any better than all seasons imho.

    Goodyear wrangler silent armors are waaaaaaay better all arounder at that handles winter conditions. I got the at51 for the forerunner because they were cheaper than gysa we had previously. regrets, will replace them with GYSA as the summer/fall at tire once the at51 wear out.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  2. #252
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,881
    I know guys who just drive around small town narthern BC not very much milage so they just run the same tires all year round but its snow tire they run all year

    I just shelled out < 1800$ for new steel rims and 10ply LT3 Haks cuz they are simply zee best, at my current tire usage I won't be buying tires for 10 yrs
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  3. #253
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Almost Mountains
    Posts
    1,883
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    I know guys who just drive around small town narthern BC not very much milage so they just run the same tires all year round but its snow tire they run all year

    I just shelled out < 1800$ for new steel rims and 10ply LT3 Haks cuz they are simply zee best, at my current tire usage I won't be buying tires for 10 yrs
    My last rig (older Xterra) got snow tires shortly after I bought it and then I never bothered buying summer tires because I've also got a motorcycle. Living at 5,000 feet and playing at 7-11k in Montana, that worked pretty well (when I really didn't want to ride the bike, the snow tires usually weren't a bad thing).

    Sent from my SM-G892A using TGR Forums mobile app

  4. #254
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,676
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    I think it was that 300lbs... Or your old winter tires sucked ass. These at51s do not compare to any snow tire I've driven in any slippery winter conditions.

    At51 are not any better than all seasons imho.

    Goodyear wrangler silent armors are waaaaaaay better all arounder at that handles winter conditions. I got the at51 for the forerunner because they were cheaper than gysa we had previously. regrets, will replace them with GYSA as the summer/fall at tire once the at51 wear out.
    I had the weight in the back with the old tires too.

    Maybe they sucked... not sure.

    Sent from my SM-A505W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  5. #255
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    32
    I like the Nokian All-Weather & they have handled summer fine. They are good at picking up screws & nails but expect a soft tire would. The real test is whether they have the same grip as last winter.

  6. #256
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    I know guys who just drive around small town narthern BC not very much milage so they just run the same tires all year round but its snow tire they run all year

    I just shelled out < 1800$ for new steel rims and 10ply LT3 Haks cuz they are simply zee best, at my current tire usage I won't be buying tires for 10 yrs

    What size LT3's? And what vehicle are you putting them on? I've been looked at the non studded version of those, but there isn't a lot of info out there.

  7. #257
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    And to think it takes me 30-40 minutes to switch tires.

    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  8. #258
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    And to think it takes me 30-40 minutes to switch tires.

    Pretty sure my old tires are better on snow than their new tires..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  9. #259
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,881
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    What size LT3's? And what vehicle are you putting them on? I've been looked at the non studded version of those, but there isn't a lot of info out there.
    245/75R16 on a new Tacoma, I think they come studded, I been driving to the top of the Chair and there seems to be lots of traction
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  10. #260
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Nice, thanks. Think I'll pull the trigger on a set. They're available in factory studded and non-studded versions, at least here in the US. If I was going studded I would look at the Hakk 9's, since they have the little air cushion thing and are supposed to be quiet/handle well on dry pavement for a studded tire. Definitely don't need the studded LT3's where I currently reside.

  11. #261
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,285
    Last season I ordered a pair of unstuded Haka LTs, but they showed up with studs. I knew that I would need snow tires after the Studded tires April 15th ban. However, I decided to just run the studs, and I was super happy with them.

    In April I bought a set of Mazama Open Range A/Ts with a mountain snowflake. They have been a good tire on spring snow, logging roads, and towing all summer.

    I bet the Mazama Open Range would be good for year-around with the occasional need to chain-up. With the Hakas I only need chains if towing. Also, it was nice towing with the Hakas when making a Christmas RV trip and driving over roads with a bit of ice/snow/frost but never enough to need for chains

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    How was the noise level with the studded ones?

  13. #263
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,285
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    How was the noise level with the studded ones?
    Plenty quieter than my pretty quiet diesel.

  14. #264
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Almost Mountains
    Posts
    1,883
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    How was the noise level with the studded ones?
    IMO, with my LT2s, it's noticeable but I don't tend to find it obnoxious until I get a couple of warm April afternoons that I'm driving home from skiing with the windows open. It is more noise than my AT tires, but with the windows closed and radio on, I have to listen for it to hear it.

  15. #265
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Thanks for the input. I was primarily curious but I do too much wet, cold driving (i.e. 32-42ish degrees F and raining) to justify the hit to wet road braking and handling that comes with studs.

    I've never run studded tires, but I can always hear a car on studded tires coming from about 2 miles away. Bet they're noisier from outside the car than within.

    Also, sorry for the hijack: this is the 3PMSF all season thread, not the thread to discuss what is probably the most capable snow tire on the market.

  16. #266
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    IDK.. A studded all season tire would be totally bad ass! Maybe make the studs out of diamonds so they bite asphalt and concrete like crazy
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  17. #267
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    Thanks for the input. I was primarily curious but I do too much wet, cold driving (i.e. 32-42ish degrees F and raining) to justify the hit to wet road braking and handling that comes with studs.

    I've never run studded tires, but I can always hear a car on studded tires coming from about 2 miles away. Bet they're noisier from outside the car than within.

    Also, sorry for the hijack: this is the 3PMSF all season thread, not the thread to discuss what is probably the most capable snow tire on the market.
    For the driving you describe, Blizzak DMV2 or Hakka R3 are the ultimate in performance.

    If you rarely have exposed pavement and are always driving on ice and hardpack between fresh snows, that is when studded is worth it over stud-less (which truly do have comparable performance on hardpack/ice). I'd choose a Hakka studded for top studded performance.

    Mich Xi3 is the preferred long life studdless snow. Hankooks seems to be the budget choice.

    Whatever you get: narrow your section width by 10-20mm, so if you were a 265/65/17, a 245/75/17 will give you much more performance because in deeper stuff, instead of planing or getting pushed around, you will cut through slush and get the tire on the road surface. Narrowing the section width also offers the opportunity to lower the tire height which gives you less snow tire squirlies on the corners and a lower center of gravity. Dropping your ride height can be a good idea unless you frequently are encountering snow that is near or above your car's clearance.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  18. #268
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    10,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    For the driving you describe, Blizzak DMV2 or Hakka R3 are the ultimate in performance.

    If you rarely have exposed pavement and are always driving on ice and hardpack between fresh snows, that is when studded is worth it over stud-less (which truly do have comparable performance on hardpack/ice). I'd choose a Hakka studded for top studded performance.

    Mich Xi3 is the preferred long life studdless snow. Hankooks seems to be the budget choice.

    Whatever you get: narrow your section width by 10-20mm, so if you were a 265/65/17, a 245/75/17 will give you much more performance because in deeper stuff, instead of planing or getting pushed around, you will cut through slush and get the tire on the road surface. Narrowing the section width also offers the opportunity to lower the tire height which gives you less snow tire squirlies on the corners and a lower center of gravity. Dropping your ride height can be a good idea unless you frequently are encountering snow that is near or above your car's clearance.
    This. Well said and put together.
    I experienced this first hand when I moved from Eastern WA to Western. Although it was kinda fun to side-slide/power-spin through wet concrete curves with worn Hankook studded. Not fun knowing that traction wouldn’t be there if needed in an evasive manuever.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  19. #269
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Well said, Summit. Although the real reason that you feel a shorter tire biting more in slick conditions has to do with the LENGTH of the contact patch, not the width. The tread width difference between a 265 and 245 are negligible when they're mounted on a vehicle, but that smaller diameter tire will have a substantially shorter contact patch. This is also the reason that tall, skinny tires are preferred for off-roading pretty much everywhere in the world except this country, where morons are obsessed with running the widest tire they can possibly shoehorn under a truck. Don't get me started on negative offset wheels...

  20. #270
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    Well said, Summit. Although the real reason that you feel a shorter tire biting more in slick conditions has to do with the LENGTH of the contact patch, not the width. The tread width difference between a 265 and 245 are negligible when they're mounted on a vehicle, but that smaller diameter tire will have a substantially shorter contact patch. This is also the reason that tall, skinny tires are preferred for off-roading pretty much everywhere in the world except this country, where morons are obsessed with running the widest tire they can possibly shoehorn under a truck.
    That makes sense! Although I can say that when I'm cutting through slush piles, say chaging lanes, I feel less pushed around. Maybe that is surface area pushing through, or maybe its the contact patch? Or both probably.

    Fat tires make sense for flotation and grip in the loose: sand, deep snow, etc. I put 275 AT51s on the 4Runner for summer, wasn't feeling the need to mod for extra width. Next set might be stock 265s GYSAs.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  21. #271
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    7,446
    Just ordered up a set of studded Hakk 8's for the milf mobile ( XC60 T6 ). Went through the last couple of winters on unstudded IPikes that were meh. We ran studded IPikes on a previous RX350 (sucky AWD) and XC90 and XC70 (awesome AWD) which we liked better. Let's see how these do.

    Tires Easy had a great deal, $94 each and free shipping.

  22. #272
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Almost Mountains
    Posts
    1,883
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    IDK.. A studded all season tire would be totally bad ass! Maybe make the studs out of diamonds so they bite asphalt and concrete like crazy
    Some AT tires are studdable (I think the Duratrac is, General Grabber AT, and maybe the KO2?). I've also heard of studding MT tires, which sounds like an interesting idea for deep-snow driving or just keeping your bro-dozer from sliding off the road.

    I'm currently considering options for the wife's XV. She doesn't think she needs snow tires, but the all-seasons on it are worn enough that I'd disagree, but not worn enough to be trash. Putting an all-weather tire on still sounds appealing from a "not needing to swap in the spring" perspective, as she wants to replace the car soon enough that I'm not convinced buying a set of wheels is worth the effort.

  23. #273
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,104
    Just a reminder that weight and pressure determine contact patch area. I don't think a slight change in diameter you would see from, say the next size up or down that would still work on the same vehicle is going to have much of an effect on shape though. Clearly, if I make my tire 20mm narrower, the patch will need to be 20mm longer. But what change would I see from going like 1/2" shorter in diameter?

    In addition to a narrower tread having some benefit in looser stuff, deep snow, slush (rally cars use hilariously narrow tires in the winter btw), the other part if it has to do with what's called slip angle. When you corner, there's a difference between where the wheel is pointed and where the car is actually going. Part of this slip angle comes from deflection of the tire casing, some comes from deflection of the tread, and some comes from parts of the tread slipping in relation to the road. More slip angle, more cornering force, more cornering force, more slip angle. On pavement, a lower slip angle is preferable, so low profile, wide, stiff tires. Makes the car more responsive and keeps tire temps lower. On ice and snow and low grip situations however, softer, taller, narrower tires mean higher slip angles and more feedback to what's happening between the tire and the road before you are fully sliding out of control. A tall, skinny snow tire being pushed on pavement might get up to over 10 degrees, where a low profile high performance tire would only be at like 2 degrees of slip at the same cornering force.

    The downside there being more floating and squirming around on the dry pavement but you get used to that and it works better in the snow.
    Last edited by jamal; 10-18-2019 at 09:58 AM.

  24. #274
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    30,881
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster View Post
    How was the noise level with the studded ones?
    studded Haks on the Ranger were noisy but studded Haks on the Taco are not that noisy, you hear the tic tic but the rest of the road noise gets filtered out, I suppose the old ranger was an old and noisey design
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  25. #275
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    21,938
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Just a reminder that weight and pressure determine contact patch area. I don't think a slight change in diameter you would see from, say the next size up or down that would still work on the same vehicle is going to have much of an effect on shape though. Clearly, if I make my tire 20mm narrower, the patch will need to be 20mm longer. But what change would I see from going like 1/2" shorter in diameter?

    In addition to a narrower tread having some benefit in looser stuff, deep snow, slush (rally cars us hilariously narrow tires in the winter btw), the other part if it has to do with what's called slip angle. When you corner, there's a difference between where the wheel is pointed and where the car is actually going. Part of this slip angle comes from deflection of the tire casing, some comes from deflection of the tread, and some comes from parts of the tread slipping in relation to the road. More slip angle, more cornering force, more cornering force, more slip angle. On pavement, a lower slip angle is preferable, so low profile, wide, stiff tires. Makes the car more responsive and keeps tire temps lower. On ice and snow and low grip situations however, softer, taller, narrower tires mean higher slip angles and more feedback to what's happening between the tire and the road before you are fully sliding out of control.

    The downside there being more floating and squirming around on the dry pavement but you get used to that and it works better in the snow.
    Good post!
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •