Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: math ?
-
09-12-2016, 04:48 PM #1
math ?
Hi, help my son combine like terms....
(2a + 3z) x (4a - 2z) =
Is this correct? 8a x (-6z)
Thx
-
09-12-2016, 04:52 PM #2“When you see something that is not right, not just, not fair, you have a moral obligation to say something. To do something." Rep. John Lewis
Kindness is a bridge between all people
Dunkin’ Donuts Worker Dances With Customer Who Has Autism
-
09-12-2016, 04:53 PM #3
math doesnt do shit
teach your son how to scamZone Controller
"He wants to be a pro, bro, not some schmuck." - Hugh Conway
"DigitalDeath would kick my ass. He has the reach of a polar bear." - Crass3000
-
09-12-2016, 05:08 PM #4
assuming x= multiply, then FOIL is your friend = First, Outside, Inside, Last
F = (2a) x (4a) = 8a^2
O = (2a) x (-2z) = -4az
I = (3z) x (4a) = 12az
L = (3z) x (-2z) = -6z^2
Combine terms = 8a^2 -4az +12az -6z^2
Answer = 8a^2 + 8az - 6z^2
-
09-12-2016, 05:22 PM #5
-
09-12-2016, 05:46 PM #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,037
I flunked math 12 and highschool but they gave me a pass cuz the math/science faculty were afraid I would come back and make their life hell the next year, 9 months later I got into IBM strictly on my ability to drink/smoke/party and fix a hopped up 67 mustang
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
09-12-2016, 05:49 PM #7
-
09-12-2016, 05:56 PM #8
-
09-12-2016, 07:19 PM #9
Multiplication distributes over addition:
A*(B+C) == A*B + A*C. and (B+C)*A == B*A + C*A
So (x+y) * (u+v) == (x+y)*u + (x+y)*v == x*u+y*u + x*v + y*v.
At one point, math could make you a multimillionaire. I don't know if that works anymore.
and I make mistakes...Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
-
09-12-2016, 07:22 PM #10
-
09-12-2016, 07:26 PM #11
-
09-12-2016, 08:07 PM #12
I guess another way of looking at it......
2a + 3z
4a - 2z
_____________
8a^2 + 12az
- 4az - 6z^2
_____________
8a^2 + 8az - 6z^2
-
09-12-2016, 09:46 PM #13
FOIL.
Also, if you can't explain the method, then you're completely defeating the purpose of your son learning this to begin with.
-
09-12-2016, 09:55 PM #14
hire a tutor
or tell him that the world needs ditchdiggers too."fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
"She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
"everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy
-
09-12-2016, 10:41 PM #15Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 3,281
I don't think they teach foil any more. They use a tile method that confuses the fuck out of me when my oldest was learning. I showed him foil and ended up confusing the fuck out of him. Download photo math app and it will save you and your kid alot of grief.
-
09-13-2016, 07:33 AM #16
What they have done with math instruction in schools should be considered criminal. I blame this guy for what they did to VT schools: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_I._Gross
I see hydraulic turtles.
-
09-14-2016, 12:11 AM #17click here
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- valley of the heart's delight
- Posts
- 2,478
Do our students lern good with tiles?
Sure looks confusing, though I can see some conceptual advantages when it comes to completing the square. When I learned algebra, we did axioms and theorems, and then applied them. FOIL didn't mean much to me, I just applied distributive theorem twice.
Hopefully some education wizard verified that these new approaches produce kids who laugh at (and vote out) the politicians who cut 'millions' from a trillion dollar budget.
To OP's question, think of -2 as +(-2). It's just a negative coefficient. And below I simplified by solving a different, similar problem, so you see the minus sign without the FOIL / cross multiply / whatever they call it these days.
(3z) x (4a - 2z) =
(3z) x (4a + (- 2)*z) = i.e. -2 is the coefficient of z.
3z x 4a + 3z x (-2)z = multiplied out the coefficients and unknown (a and z)
12za + (-6)z^2 = that's a z squared
12az - 6z^2 Changed the above to reflect conventions: pop the minus sign back out from the coefficient, and rearrange the unknowns to alphabetic order. Note that mathematically, all the formulas are equivalent and valid. The first and last formulas are conventional ways to write the formula. First shows a product of 3z and (4a - 2z). Last shows the result.
Hope it's clearer than mud.10/01/2012 Site was upgraded to 300 baud.
-
09-14-2016, 01:09 AM #18Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Posts
- 3,607
When you are doing equations like this, and you are not sure of the answer, it is sometimes a good idea to "sanity check" your answer. In this case, a and z are variables. Try setting them to a few values and see if your answer makes sense. For example, if you set both a=z=1, then (2+3)x(4-2)= 5x2=10. Whereas in your first answer, 8x (-6) = -48, which is clearly wrong.
Sanity checking won't prove that an equation is right all the time, especially if you are using small numbers like 1 to check with, but it is a useful tool to make math tangible and real, rather than just some abstract symbols.
Bookmarks