Page 278 of 598 FirstFirst ... 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 ... LastLast
Results 6,926 to 6,950 of 14948
  1. #6926
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,659
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    I know TGR might make it seem like we are selling lots of CDs, but it's about the same as always. We build em one, maybe two days per year. No plans right now for a wider Woodsman or Jeffrey. Maybe someday, but the demand for a wider ski (aka people asking) is very small and at this point - production prioritizes volume or customs. Custom pricing is standardize this year - and includes the topsheet swap.



    To me, BG vs CD decision comes down to time in variable snow. The CD and BG Tour are similar in that rounder, more even flex pattern. Floats better, but doesn't have the same punch as the stock BG. If you are skiing somewhere that you need power through variable, the stock ski is just more powerful and stable. If you can generally stay in the trees or more consistent snow, then the CD is a lot of fun.
    So there be tour layups of the BG or the C&D available next season or is that a custom job? Apologies if this was already covered. Steeple? Just not seeing any on the site.

  2. #6927
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    So there be tour layups of the BG or the C&D available next season or is that a custom job? Apologies if this was already covered. Steeple? Just not seeing any on the site.
    C&D comes w/ tour layup stock

  3. #6928
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    I know TGR might make it seem like we are selling lots of CDs, but it's about the same as always. We build em one, maybe two days per year. No plans right now for a wider Woodsman or Jeffrey. Maybe someday, but the demand for a wider ski (aka people asking) is very small and at this point - production prioritizes volume or customs. Custom pricing is standardize this year - and includes the topsheet swap.
    Damn! Well someone's gotta be 1st to ask.
    Guess I'll just keep whoarding Boneshakers.

  4. #6929
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    So there be tour layups of the BG or the C&D available next season or is that a custom job? Apologies if this was already covered. Steeple? Just not seeing any on the site.
    Custom only on BG. As Tuco noted - CD is tour layup on the stock ski.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  5. #6930
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,183
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    To me, BG vs CD decision comes down to time in variable snow. The CD and BG Tour are similar in that rounder, more even flex pattern. Floats better, but doesn't have the same punch as the stock BG. If you are skiing somewhere that you need power through variable, the stock ski is just more powerful and stable. If you can generally stay in the trees or more consistent snow, then the CD is a lot of fun.
    I love that description and comparison. I agree with it wholeheartedly. If you get a lot of deep snow, the two skis can complement one another, especially is you get dry deep days as well as variable deep days. I could see the C&D being a favorite in places where you get deep and dry as the norm, where the rounder flex and better float are nothing but a benefit.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  6. #6931
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,019
    I have a hard believing anything would better in deep untracked or cut up funk than my SG’s in the 1 flex.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  7. #6932
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by detrusor View Post
    I have a hard believing anything would better in deep untracked or cut up funk than my SG’s in the 1 flex.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    1 size up(126)Woodsman would
    Beleeeeedat

  8. #6933
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Mostly the Elks, mostly.
    Posts
    1,283
    Quote Originally Posted by detrusor View Post
    I have a hard believing anything would better in deep untracked or cut up funk than my SG’s in the 1 flex.
    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    respectfully, as for 'deep untracked' .. think pillow fight!!!

    Name:  IMG_3942.jpg
Views: 859
Size:  85.6 KB

    However I agree whole-heartedly with the 'cut-up funk' part. super goats rage here.

    Ordered 2020 C/D 189's ... quiver of 3: pillow fights, super goats, and cease and desists.

    what a time to be alive

  9. #6934
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    So you guys get first crack before we post em publicly, we just put a bunch of in-stock customs in the store if anyone wants a custom at with sale discount, but without the wait.
    https://shop.on3pskis.com/collection...k-ship-customs

    A Woodsman 126 would certainly be quite the ski. Would take a good bit of interest to get there, though.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  10. #6935
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by noturnsnecessary View Post
    Sorry to double post, but another question regarding sizing. I'm also 5'6 150, consider myself relatively advanced, and mostly ski Tahoe with the occasional trip to Whistler or Utah. Currently have the 108 Wrens in 179 (19oz fiberglass) and 96 Kartels in 176 (stock).

    (Got the Kartels 2nd as a 50/50 park/spring ski as I've recently been getting more into park and generally a more playful skiing style. I really love how the Wrens can charge through anything but at times—eg trees, spinning off features, at the end of a day—they can feel like a lot of ski for me.)

    So I'm trying to decide if I should get the Woodsman in 177 stock or in 182 with the softer fiberglass. The Kartels in 176 feel perfect in spring conditions, but I've def hit the speed limit outside the park before. Would be using Woodsman as a playful daily driver.

    Thoughts?
    Any input here? Leaning toward 177

  11. #6936
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by noturnsnecessary View Post
    Any input here? Leaning toward 177
    Yep I would lean stock 177cm as well. Quite a bit more stable than 176cm Kartel 96, but won't require you to be going down the fall line as much as the Wren 108.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  12. #6937
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    So you guys get first crack before we post em publicly, we just put a bunch of in-stock customs in the store if anyone wants a custom at with sale discount, but without the wait.
    https://shop.on3pskis.com/collection...k-ship-customs

    A Woodsman 126 would certainly be quite the ski. Would take a good bit of interest to get there, though.
    I was looking at the black wren custom and noticed on the site it said it is the stiffest ski you make. Is it stiffer both longitudinally and torsionally stiffer than the 108 ti?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #6938
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    22
    Iggy, any word on when the stock woodsman will be done?

  14. #6939
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    ahead
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    Custom only on BG. As Tuco noted - CD is tour layup on the stock ski.
    What I don't understand is why the SuperGoat is 1.5x stiffer that the normal BillyGoat? I ride the 189 Goats and while I don't think I need any extra stiffness, I would have loved the extra length on the SG for those powder days.

    I was just worried that 1.5x stiff might actually reduce the SG's float relative to the 189 BG, so I went BG.

  15. #6940
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    4,605
    Quote Originally Posted by VON View Post
    What I don't understand is why the SuperGoat is 1.5x stiffer that the normal BillyGoat? I ride the 189 Goats and while I don't think I need any extra stiffness, I would have loved the extra length on the SG for those powder days.

    I was just worried that 1.5x stiff might actually reduce the SG's float relative to the 189 BG, so I went BG.
    You can get the stock goat flex in the supergoat. Many guys have that ski.

  16. #6941
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by jackattack View Post
    You can get the stock goat flex in the supergoat. Many guys have that ski.
    That would be me... 6'4" and 205 lbs and went SG in std flex... I own and owned 191 BG and the newer Goats are stiffer than the OG 191... There were no issues in the std flex for any of my Goats including the SG when it came to crud and have zero complaints on POW... Float is the shit...!

    Attached pic is my 193 SGs in std flex along with my beloved 189 108 Wrens... I wont lie as the only ski I am ordering for next season is 192 116 Woodsman...Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20190409_161416.jpeg 
Views:	214 
Size:	68.0 KB 
ID:	283326

    Sent from my SM-G955U using TGR Forums mobile app

  17. #6942
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    The man gets injured. 5 seconds later you snag his skis. Ski the damn things. Fuck a custom top sheet they’re skis.
    SMH over here lolClick image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1558627742.698003.jpg 
Views:	184 
Size:	1.25 MB 
ID:	283470
    You should have been here yesterday!

  18. #6943
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,740
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    SMH over here lolClick image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1558627742.698003.jpg 
Views:	184 
Size:	1.25 MB 
ID:	283470
    Hey dude. Have you started PT?
    How's it feeling so far?

  19. #6944
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,183
    Quote Originally Posted by VON View Post
    What I don't understand is why the SuperGoat is 1.5x stiffer that the normal BillyGoat? I ride the 189 Goats and while I don't think I need any extra stiffness, I would have loved the extra length on the SG for those powder days.

    I was just worried that 1.5x stiff might actually reduce the SG's float relative to the 189 BG, so I went BG.
    Without the extra carbon, they are virtually the same ski, IMO. Oh course, I didn’t figure that out until I had bought a standard flex SG and then bought a 189 BG later that same year thinking/hoping it would feel like a little less ski than the standard layup SG. Nope. Hard for this guy to tell the difference. So I decided to man up and learn to ski the SG better. Now that we are better acquainted, the SG is my go to for PNW variable pow/deep days. Plus, I went with the America topsheets and they just look amazing.

    I’m keeping the 189 BG for junior since he is growing like a weed.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  20. #6945
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Without the extra carbon, they are virtually the same ski, IMO. Oh course, I didn’t figure that out until I had bought a standard flex SG and then bought a 189 BG later that same year thinking/hoping it would feel like a little less ski than the standard layup SG. Nope. Hard for this guy to tell the difference. So I decided to man up and learn to ski the SG better. Now that we are better acquainted, the SG is my go to for PNW variable pow/deep days. Plus, I went with the America topsheets and they just look amazing.

    I’m keeping the 189 BG for junior since he is growing like a weed.
    Coulda sworn SG had a thicker core profile too.
    Iggy?
    Mine seem thicker in the middle than my other On3P's. Don't have BG's yet though.. And mine are 2x

  21. #6946
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,183
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Coulda sworn SG had a thicker core profile too.
    Iggy?
    Mine seem thicker in the middle than my other On3P's. Don't have BG's yet though.. And mine are 2x
    I’ll get the calipers out later and check overall thickness. Not completely scientific but I am curious to see the outcome.

    Also, probably more accurate to say they “feel” or “ski” virtually the same...at least to me.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  22. #6947
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    4,605
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Coulda sworn SG had a thicker core profile too.
    Iggy?
    Mine seem thicker in the middle than my other On3P's. Don't have BG's yet though.. And mine are 2x
    The SG's are noticeably thicker than my other ON3P's as well. I'm riding 1.5x.

    A lot of additional info in the original PSA https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...3P-Limited-Run

  23. #6948
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,019
    My SG’s in the 1 flex are much thicker than the wife’s BG’s. Of course there is a length difference.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  24. #6949
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    Hey dude. Have you started PT?
    How's it feeling so far?
    Its day 6 since surgery and already losing my mind. BUT I’m off of crutches and lifting today and then start official PT tomorrow

    Feels like I had my hamstring ripped out and then screwed into my tibia and femur...which is what they did.

    Haha
    You should have been here yesterday!

  25. #6950
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,285
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    Its day 6 since surgery and already losing my mind. BUT I’m off of crutches and lifting today and then start official PT tomorrow

    Feels like I had my hamstring ripped out and then screwed into my tibia and femur...which is what they did.

    Haha
    Work the extension & the harvest site! Best.

    PM w any questions!

    Iriponsnow MSPT, PT, CSCS, Cert-DN, FRCms, M|WOD Cert

    Physical Therapist
    Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist
    Dry Needling Certified / Credentialed
    Functional Range Conditioning Mobility Specialist
    M|WOD Movement & Mobility Certified

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •