Page 269 of 599 FirstFirst ... 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 ... LastLast
Results 6,701 to 6,725 of 14969
  1. #6701
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    As this will all be out really soon, here is everything but the Woodsman.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_BillyGoat_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	262 
Size:	841.5 KB 
ID:	278931Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Cease&Desist_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	287 
Size:	966.3 KB 
ID:	278932

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Wrenegade96Ti_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	256 
Size:	412.9 KB 
ID:	278933Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Wrenegade108Ti_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	228 
Size:	647.6 KB 
ID:	278934

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Wrenegade96_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	212 
Size:	689.7 KB 
ID:	278935Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Wrenegade108_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	224 
Size:	688.3 KB 
ID:	278937

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Jeffrey96_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	215 
Size:	631.1 KB 
ID:	278938Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Jeffrey108_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	218 
Size:	687.3 KB 
ID:	278939Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Jeffrey116_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	224 
Size:	711.6 KB 
ID:	278940

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Magnus90_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	209 
Size:	832.0 KB 
ID:	278941Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Magnus102_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	211 
Size:	734.7 KB 
ID:	278942

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Jessie96_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	210 
Size:	781.5 KB 
ID:	278943Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Jessie108_Preview_330x2000x72x-01.png 
Views:	214 
Size:	882.0 KB 
ID:	278944
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  2. #6702
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Everything looks really solid this year Iggy! Great job!
    Excited for the woodsman

  3. #6703
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    511
    No worries I know you’re super busy.

    Love the new graphics. Especially the TI series. Can’t wait to see those in person.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #6704
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,304
    Man, you guys have done it again Iggy.

    A daemon eating a man was a classy move for sure for going full on evil graphics Jessies/Magnus/Jeffreys look like they will have one helluva on-snow presence. I am guessing the colors will pop like crazy.

    And to whoever bought the 179 BG/BGtours blem skis - thank you You saved me from impulse buying wren-ti-s as well The inevitable conclusion over obsessing which width to get would have just resulted in me getting both. Can't wait for people to start getting on the new ti wrens and providing feedback. PowTron seems to have gotten along with his pretty well

    Can't wait for more info on Woodsmans as well.

    Also, ON3P 5 cannot come soon enough too. Considering the current list of back country magicians you have riding for you, that one should be an instant hit 4 was kinda interesting, if not 100% relatable

  5. #6705
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    15
    Hey Iggy,
    About that post on the ON3P Instagram regarding bringing out some more throwback top sheets, will it be like at the end of the season again or when were you thinking?

  6. #6706
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,938



    I want the first 4 pair pictured and the woodsman. why is my ski rack already full

  7. #6707
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Woodsman96_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	187 
Size:	630.6 KB 
ID:	279193Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Woodsman108_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	255 
Size:	786.2 KB 
ID:	279194Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2020_Woodsman116_Preview_330x2000x72px-01.png 
Views:	216 
Size:	839.1 KB 
ID:	279195
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  8. #6708
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,122
    waaaant

  9. #6709
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,717
    WOODSMAN!! Try and keep those in stock. Take all 3 and await a 122

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  10. #6710
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,732
    Have an inquiry in on some blemished Wrens but shit.... kinda want a 114 woodsman...
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  11. #6711
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    13
    Dere she is in all her glory. The Woodsman is here!

    Sent from my Z839 using Tapatalk

  12. #6712
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,691
    Wait— a wren 108 ti? Titanal? Can you elaborate?

  13. #6713
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,304
    oh my - so fresh and so clean! The Woodsman has arrived in style!

    Can't wait for the specs. The coloring had me confused there for a micro second too

    Gaijin - yes, ti as in titanal. The plate is recessed into the core to offset stiffness, meaning they are not "just" a regular wren + titanal, they are specifically engineered for titanal with comparable stiffness to stock (if i understood it correctly). According to PowTron minds have been blown over the performance of ON3P's traditional layup + titanal. Edge hold is supposedly very, very good (duh) while retaining the traditional performance of ON3Ps that we know and love. Other than that not much is known as far as I know. I guess all will be made known over the next week

    Especially wren96ti really get me excited. A narrow shape that slays fresh and variable, but with improved edge grip and + on the damp scale? Sign me up! That just begs the question though - mount my standard 96 wrens, or sell those and get me some ti's instead?

    The other big cononudrum is what to do with my k108/k116s. Remount a bit further back (#Iggyspoison), or leave as is? Decisions decisions. They will both stay on for the 2020 ski season though I think. Yeah, I am pretty sure.

    I always thought that improving on the 2019 range was a tall order, but Iggy&crew seem to have pulled it off yet again! I am not sure if wrens with titanal gets me the most excited, or Woodsmans. I've said so before, but these are fine days to be an ON3P fanboy
    Last edited by kid-kapow; 04-20-2019 at 06:01 AM.

  14. #6714
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,176
    Excited on the Woodsman.

    Could replace my Peacemaker for a chargy-fun ski

  15. #6715
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    await a 122

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    Now you're speaking my language! Although I was thinkin' 124 in keeping w/ +8mm theme.
    Seriously though, is this 122 a thing?(if so, no brainer for me)

  16. #6716
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,717
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Now you're speaking my language! Although I was thinkin' 124 in keeping w/ +8mm theme.
    Seriously though, is this 122 a thing?(if so, no brainer for me)
    Haa no idea. Seemed like a good idea at the time. Without seeing the rocker profile, the numbers and shape looks like it'd good in that width as well

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  17. #6717
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    The other big cononudrum is what to do with my k108/k116s. Remount a bit further back (#Iggyspoison), or leave as is? Decisions decisions.
    get out of my head

  18. #6718
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,304
    I really like it when the details and references in the graphics become apparent. If you check ON3P's insta one can see that the pattern on the new Jeffreys are stylized B-52s or some such, a pretty clear reference to the cloudy Jeffrey 114/122s. Classy. Their on snow presence with tectured top sheets must be pretty amazing imo.

    Quote Originally Posted by detuned View Post
    get out of my head
    Snicker For now my conclusion is to remount my k116s minus two, or 1.5, and leave my k108s as is for now. The k108s might transition into a purer freestyle / glacier role in my quiver, so on the line should be fine if so. If they will retain an all mountain daily driver status then minus two is prob the way to go for them as well.

  19. #6719
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Davis California
    Posts
    261
    Iggy. When can we buy the woodsman? Congrats on 10 years and here’s to 10 more. What Woodsman length will be more comparable to the 189 BG in terms of maneuverability- 187 or 192?
    Go Sox!

  20. #6720
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    Haa no idea. Seemed like a good idea at the time. Without seeing the rocker profile, the numbers and shape looks like it'd good in that width as well

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    Agreed.
    Possible DD candidate for me.
    116 looks good too, but for me personally, the smaller widths are kinda pointless

  21. #6721
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Less flat
    Posts
    3,783
    I donno... a 186/96 woodsman or possibly a w96ti as an ec dd. I think both these skis in a variety of widths are going to cut a wide swath across skier ability/style/technique and snow conditions in the marketplace... Bravo on3p

    Could fit in where I was about to drop a dynastarx96/88 for next year's quiver. Being on the substantially same core assembly within the quiver could pay forward. Both skis would fill the softer condition ec/dd and cover hard crude bustin/old snow big mtn quiver slots
    Last edited by Gepeto; 04-20-2019 at 07:20 PM.
    ​I am not in your hurry

  22. #6722
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,717
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Agreed.
    Possible DD candidate for me.
    116 looks good too, but for me personally, the smaller widths are kinda pointless
    Damn! Not a bad problem to have if thatd be your DD. Really liking everything about these woodsmans so far. I'm envisioning their splay and rocker somewhere between the bg and Jefferies.

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  23. #6723
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    the pattern on the new Jeffreys are stylized B-52s or some such
    good eye, i like the bomb graphic as well. very...dr. strangelove...


    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    The k108s might transition into a purer freestyle / glacier role in my quiver, so on the line should be fine if so. If they will retain an all mountain daily driver status then minus two is prob the way to go for them as well.
    i'm on board for -2 myself. lord knows i waffled enough early on and finally mounted at rec. my plan is to get the woodsman and compare rocker/sidecut/mount point. prolly go rec on the woodsman which should go to my dd slot and move the K108 to my pedestrian/low tide slot that my wren 98's had

  24. #6724
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    Can't wait for people to start getting on the new ti wrens and providing feedback.
    I skied the Wren 108 TI. It does have really good edge hold on hardpack and it is probably the most damp ski I have ever skied. The day I skied it, it snowed 3 inches on top of refrozen hardpark. It handled transitions from refrozen crap to pockets of fresh snow very well. It also worked fairly well in moguls for how stable it is. If I was forced to have only one ski this would most likely be it.

    One negative to the ski, is it may be too damp. It is less lively than either my wren 114 or bodacious.

  25. #6725
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by tpacent View Post
    Iggy. When can we buy the woodsman? Congrats on 10 years and here’s to 10 more. What Woodsman length will be more comparable to the 189 BG in terms of maneuverability- 187 or 192?
    Ability to purchase early next week. First production batches start up late next week, so shipping will be around mid May on 182/187, a bit later on 177/192.

    10 year really comes in late May, but figured we'd start rolling it out in some capacity now. Gone by fast though.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	WoodsmanRocker-01.png 
Views:	165 
Size:	109.8 KB 
ID:	279297

    Length wise vs the BG I would size up (guys skiing a 184cm BG would likely want to be on a 187cm Woodsman, 189cm BG on the 192cm Woodsman).

    Quote Originally Posted by TimersMix View Post
    Hey Iggy,
    About that post on the ON3P Instagram regarding bringing out some more throwback top sheets, will it be like at the end of the season again or when were you thinking?
    No timeline right now. We just made about 50 pairs with throwback tops (a lot of which are gone, but some still left).

    We've considering maybe bringing back our favorite individual topsheet per season, as a custom option, but we're also a bit concerned right now on just having too many choices - particularly with some new customs tops rolling out soon. We might be de-listing some of the less popular current options, along with adding an input section, just so that we can keep the page more manageable for people. We'll see.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •