Page 172 of 598 FirstFirst ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... LastLast
Results 4,276 to 4,300 of 14944
  1. #4276
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,512
    ^throw on the metal tip from the head Monster series, a great GaperImpala

  2. #4277
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,909
    Quote Originally Posted by markcjr View Post
    I like what blister does to show actual rocker (tip and tail pics, laying flat on a table, squeezed together not squeezed together Etc) as opposed to just listing a line drawing with the numbers. It's easier for me to compute that way. Obviously the best way is to just fondle them but I can't always do that if I'm ordering online.

    Sent from my VS987 using TGR Forums mobile app
    If nothing else, having an independent 3rd party doing the measurements is helpful just because the numbers are comparable between brands, whereas the manufacturers that do list numbers all tend to measure them differently.

  3. #4278
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,655
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    I vote for a pointy tipped super Wren so that we can impale gapers that get in the way.
    Here's my vote:


  4. #4279
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    Honestly, conceptually the Oar was really interesting, and remember, it made enough sense that we spent time/money on building them.

    I think the one that stands out was one with the working name "The Dead Lung"....though so long ago hard to remember. Essentially a non-rockered, super super super damp, super super soft ski that would, in theory, just sort of flow over everything.
    That name came from Kip haha.

    Soft, 110 underfoot and no sidecut - straight skis are back baby. Thought it would be an interesting testbed for rocker profiles and less hooky in 3D snow. Sidecut is for sissies.

  5. #4280
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    79
    I have a question about tail rocker, as pertaining to ski length and mounting point. Using the Kartel 108 as an example of a ski that has a heavily rocker tail...if never riding switch or spinning, does the 5 cm at the end do anything? For example if I chop 5 cm off the tail (as in my photoshop pic), would this affect the way it skis, or be totally unnoticeable?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.jpg 
Views:	115 
Size:	272.6 KB 
ID:	235471   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20180220_125628.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	110.6 KB 
ID:	235472  

  6. #4281
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,909
    You'd die instantly.

  7. #4282
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey311 View Post
    I have a question about tail rocker, as pertaining to ski length and mounting point. Using the Kartel 108 as an example of a ski that has a heavily rocker tail...if never riding switch or spinning, does the 5 cm at the end do anything? For example if I chop 5 cm off the tail (as in my photoshop pic), would this affect the way it skis, or be totally unnoticeable?
    You could cut it off if you want - but you would want to do so in a way that keeps the integrity of the edges and core that both extend in the tip. That said, not sure you gain much for the time/effort unless the tail is bothering you for some reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    You'd die instantly.
    Also this.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  8. #4283
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    79
    I guess I wasn't clear. I would not consider actually chopping the tail off a ski. I was just pondering the way I think about ski length and mounting point. For instance if I ignore the back 5cm of a 181cm ski mounted at -4.25 from center. I can think about it as being very similar to a ski with a flatter tail 176cm length mounted -6.75 from center.

    [QUOTE=iggyskier;5343685]You could cut it off if you want - but you would want to do so in a way that keeps the integrity of the edges and core that both extend in the tip. That said, not sure you gain much for the time/effort unless the tail is bothering you for some reason.

  9. #4284
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,041
    You would lose 5 extra cm of support for when you are wheelying on your tails out of a drop or if you like to butter etc

    Sent from my VS987 using TGR Forums mobile app

  10. #4285
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    967
    stoked, just got a 179 BG to replace my 176 I sold yesterday! Long wait ahead...

  11. #4286
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by easternskr View Post
    I'm 5'9" and 155. I have 179 Wren 108s and when I was at Big Sky this winter those skis seemed custom made for that place. However, when back home at Stowe, and skiing tighter trails, especially in the woods, the Wrens wanted to run faster then I was comfortable with. I am most likely going to pick up a pair of 18/19 Kartel 96 for next season with the idea that the slightly narrower waist and tighter side cut and softer flex should make for a great east coast all around ski, especially in the trees. Seeing you got to try both the Wren 98 and the Kartel 98 at Smuggs, would you agree that the Kartel is simply quicker and easier for tighter East Coast conditions? Thanks
    let me know if you are thinking in selling the w108 to fund you new ski!

    EDIT: Never mind, gotta my answer a few posts after this!

  12. #4287
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    1,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey311 View Post
    I have a question about tail rocker, as pertaining to ski length and mounting point. Using the Kartel 108 as an example of a ski that has a heavily rocker tail...if never riding switch or spinning, does the 5 cm at the end do anything? For example if I chop 5 cm off the tail (as in my photoshop pic), would this affect the way it skis, or be totally unnoticeable?
    I actually always wanted to do this with my last Bibby's since I thought same (but it seemed more like 10 useless cm's to me), but sold them and got something without the twin.

    I honestly think skis like the Bibby and Kartel are "easier" only because the swing weight is more balanced. And when we are talking about 2300g skis, that starts to get significant. But I'll take the extra work for more tip and a tail that isn't pointed up to the sky.
    Last edited by FlimFlamvanHam; 05-11-2018 at 04:21 PM. Reason: correcting my retarded spelling holy shit

  13. #4288
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    824
    No touring option for the Kartel 96? Send em an email?

  14. #4289
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by NWFlow View Post
    No touring option for the Kartel 96? Send em an email?
    If you want a Kartel 96 tour, email us and we can get it done.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  15. #4290
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,512
    Iggy- love the product descriptions on the website. They keep it 100, as the kids would say.

  16. #4291
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,163
    Extended the custom sale to 5/20. Another 5 days to stare at an unnecessary pair of skis in the cart. Amirite bevergeusegreene?
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  17. #4292
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Iggy, want to tell us more about the new c&d?
    Now that it is back as more of a inbounds ski, why does it still have the tour core and 19oz fiberglass? Other options too burly? Or other reasons?

  18. #4293
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Self Jupiter View Post
    Iggy- love the product descriptions on the website. They keep it 100, as the kids would say.
    Haha Thanks! Which ones? 8.5 years of writing ski copy has me pretty much cringing at all of it - how many different ways can you describe an "all mountain ski"...

    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    Extended the custom sale to 5/20. Another 5 days to stare at an unnecessary pair of skis in the cart. Amirite bevergeusegreene?
    So all the cards are on the table - we extended the custom sale because it's going better than expected. So well that I'm basically trying to figure out how much more custom production I can find the rest of the summer while getting stock skis handled. As such, we'll likely have another smaller custom ski sale opening in June to fill out our custom capacity into July and go from there - so this is likely not the last custom window, though the available pairs are going fairly quickly. We're likely not going to have any sort of in-season custom sale like we did last year, so we want to provide a few more options this summer to those who might have missed this first discount window.

    And in bevergeusegreene defense - there are a bunch of you with custom skis in the cart. Say hi next time I hit you up on chat .

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Iggy, want to tell us more about the new c&d?
    Now that it is back as more of a inbounds ski, why does it still have the tour core and 19oz fiberglass? Other options too burly? Or other reasons?
    It's still a powder ski. We want those tips to float & the decrease in rocker has stiffened it up a bit. Not sure how many here spent a lot of time on the pre-super-rockered-pre-tour-flex Cease & Desist but the weight of that ski made it a handful. The "Tour" core straddles the line on weight and it's plenty stable with the updated rocker. We're done on the design so getting the final production component built now and it will go to production soon. It will be updated on the website soon.

    A few other things:

    Just introduced a Custom SuperGoat page: https://shop.on3pskis.com/products/custom-supergoat

    Base price for just a custom topsheet is $799 right now (same as a Custom Billy Goat) but will go up to $849 in June. We'll keep that open for a month - but we added the full range of tops + custom bases. Production really hates building these (big + heavy + long ) and I can personally feel their hatred when I put them on our Upcoming production sheet so...I limited inventory and don't know if there will be another round this year. We do have a couple stragglers in stock too.

    I've also been getting more interest to update the Billy Goat to a women's version - so we likely will be putting up a women's BG page with an updated 164cm/174cm and if you like, you can add your email to the informal wait list. We're working on getting specs updated and a test build done while it is still spring - but if we find enough interest I will find time to get that build done before the season.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  19. #4294
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    It's still a powder ski. We want those tips to float & the decrease in rocker has stiffened it up a bit. Not sure how many here spent a lot of time on the pre-super-rockered-pre-tour-flex Cease & Desist but the weight of that ski made it a handful. The "Tour" core straddles the line on weight and it's plenty stable with the updated rocker. We're done on the design so getting the final production component built now and it will go to production soon. It will be updated on the website soon.
    Thanks for the update on the C&D! Roughly what do the weights come in at in the two different lenghts?

  20. #4295
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,520
    I'll leave this here

    I'm looking for Steeple 102 in 174
    Are there going to be custom pressings of non-current skis? I would certainly be interested in that ski with the middlin layup. I'm sure the interest from other customers is non-existent.

  21. #4296
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    Extended the custom sale to 5/20. Another 5 days to stare at an unnecessary pair of skis in the cart. Amirite bevergeusegreene?
    Gotta collect em’ all!

    I am broke though. Gonna take a break from ski buying, at least until early next season. I gotta buy my northstar mtb pass soon. I didn’t buy a praxis custom this year either..

    I did say I’m not selling anything, and keeping what I got... but part of me wants to trade/sell my 186 K108s for 191 K108s.



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #4297
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    On the mountain
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    I've also been getting more interest to update the Billy Goat to a women's version - so we likely will be putting up a women's BG page with an updated 164cm/174cm and if you like, you can add your email to the informal wait list. We're working on getting specs updated and a test build done while it is still spring - but if we find enough interest I will find time to get that build done before the season.
    This will make the wife really happy... She’s very interested in this version. We’ve talked about it quite a lot and she’s decided she wants a BG, but is a little intimidated by the weight/layup of a 179 (her custom W88’s are 179’s). A 174 version could be just what’s she’s after.

  23. #4298
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    2,965
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post

    I've also been getting more interest to update the Billy Goat to a women's version - so we likely will be putting up a women's BG page with an updated 164cm/174cm and if you like, you can add your email to the informal wait list. We're working on getting specs updated and a test build done while it is still spring - but if we find enough interest I will find time to get that build done before the season.
    Same width Iggy? Or slightly skinnier?

  24. #4299
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    612
    Just saw this on instagram
    Name:  20180516_173413.jpg
Views: 557
Size:  53.2 KBName:  20180516_173347.jpg
Views: 561
Size:  54.5 KB
    Looks like these are the customs that were being discussed a few weeks ago

  25. #4300
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    Same width Iggy? Or slightly skinnier?
    Skinnier. I don't see us deviating from the previous widths, which we felt were dialed (112mm in 164cm, 114mm in 174cm). That said, we're just talking now - so I haven't really dived into the design updates just yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Teenaged View Post
    Just saw this on instagram
    Name:  20180516_173413.jpg
Views: 557
Size:  53.2 KBName:  20180516_173347.jpg
Views: 561
Size:  54.5 KB
    Looks like these are the customs that were being discussed a few weeks ago
    These are actually different.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •