Results 1,876 to 1,900 of 14966
Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion
-
09-21-2017, 10:46 AM #1876
-
09-21-2017, 10:47 AM #1877
-
09-21-2017, 11:06 AM #1878
-
09-22-2017, 07:38 PM #1879
Question for Powtron or Iggy or other ON3P official or unofficial reps. Do you guys sell the Kartels to non park peeps? I can't ski park, I am wary of the center mount, I don't like the softer tail, but I like the talk of smearability and the shorter turn radius than the Wren 98. I read that the Wren 108 sounds a bit more user friendly but with my middle ageish knees and its even longer turn radius I feel like I want the 98 Wren instead of the 108 to fill the gap between my Brahma and Billy Goat. I am considering other brands as well but I love the dampness (among other things) of ON3P's so I keep steering myself back to your store. I really want something that I can ski bumps with a little bit because I still enjoy them, but something that can also handle hard snow on top and slush at the bottom - and something that can rip an afternoon pow storm or blow in...on a soft day with am fresh I will be on my BG's anyway. My limited experience with junk park skis is that they fall down completely on hard/iceish snow. My Brahma's are shortish for me at 180 and they kill the hard snow at the top of the mountain but at my size I get crushed when the snow is punchy or slushy and I hate the metal in the bumps...and the short length when I want to go fast on the flats.
So do I consider the Kartel or not? I almost made a demo last year but just missed it by a day. I just don't want to get into the Wren 98 and end up with a ski that just wants to go fast with a tail that doesn't want to release when my form goes to shit which happens more than it used to.
Also 6' 1.5 197 formerly pretty strong skier. Hopefully back at it this year. Shopping 184 Wren not sure between 186 and 181 Kartel.
-
09-22-2017, 08:09 PM #1880
unofficial workplace rep
definitely go longer on the kartel if you land that way. my 191 caylor feel super short. i say that in a positive light, though. also versatile as hell. on the contrary, i'm getting really sick of skiing bumps on my 193 cochise, and will probably be seeking a shorter replacement.
-
09-22-2017, 08:25 PM #1881
If considering other brands, possibly give Praxis MVP a look. Similar ski, but not quite as centre mounted (-6). Plenty of backbone, but probably a little poppier and less damp. (Kartels look fun, though. And Wren 108s have me drooling)
-
09-22-2017, 08:36 PM #1882
Unofficial as well. Plenty of trad skiers here who never ski park rave about the kartel. I would say go for it.
wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
Zoolander wasn't a documentary?
-
09-22-2017, 08:54 PM #1883
I'm a very trad skier, really liked the 186 Kartel 108 mounted back from recommended. XavierD - where did you put me on those? -2? -4?
-
09-23-2017, 08:58 AM #1884
Where will you be skiing? I've got a pair of veneer kartel 98's in 181 for my fun snow days, does fine on the hard pack but for the firmer days I like how the flatter tail of the wren 98 releases. The tails on the kartel will release easier while the wren will hold a turn better. For your height and weight I'd go 184 wren or 186 kartel. Pm me if you have more questions.
-
09-23-2017, 09:14 AM #1885Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- SW CO
- Posts
- 5,597
I would bet you would prefer the Wren 98 over the K98, and that's from someone who generally prefers more progressive mount points.
The new Wren 98 is not hard to ski by any means, even easier than the Wren 108. IMO, the biggest difference between the Wren and Kartel series' is the mount point. None of the Wrenegades are really big mountain guns like the big "Wren" used to be. They all have quite a bit of tip and tail rocker and taper now. So the tail definitely doesn't stay locked in on turns. I don't think the Wren skis all that differently from the Kartel, to be honest.
But if you're willing to change your style or experiment a bit, I personally find a more progressive mount with less tip is easier to handle in bumps. In which case, the Kartel could be your ticket. It would be pretty different than the Brahma...either a good thing for quiver diversity—Kartels would be better in bumps and the tails would definitely release easier—or a bad thing because you have to change your style whenever you change skis. Bottom line: Wren 98 is a safe bet for a skier who likes traditional mounts and is certainly not hard to ski but the Kartel would be an experiment that you may really enjoy. If you decide Kartel, definitely go 186. Can't speak to mounting back -2 or -4, so maybe LVS and XavierD can chime in there."Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
-
09-23-2017, 09:33 AM #1886
I resemble that profile. I pulled the trigger on a pair of 108 184 Wrens with an extra layer of carbon. LOVE THEM. Only have 3 days on them, but they will be my daily driver in the Inland NW. I tried many varieties of non directional skis (Kartel, Jeffrey, PBJ, Bibby) decided that isn't my style. The 108's charge, make a great turn shape when you want and fly through whatever when you don't want to turn. I was worried they would feel short but with the extra carbon, they feel just right. FWIW, It's a different model year but the Swap (kai ski) has a good deal right now that may help you pull the trigger.
-
09-23-2017, 11:12 AM #1887
-
09-23-2017, 11:17 AM #1888
My now 6 foot tall 15 yr old stepson has some 102 Wrens in 179 (like Kai is selling) and he loves them, rips them. Despite my best efforts to create a shadow of myself he skis nothing like me and I can't get into the binders to try them for the time being so other than to note how much he likes them it isn't helping me decide (:
Sent from my SM-G900R4 using Tapatalk
-
09-23-2017, 07:04 PM #1889
Ugly, I agree with what others have posted - you will prefer the wrens. In fact the current design of the wren 98 is basically made for guys like you.
-
09-23-2017, 11:11 PM #1890Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 56
-
09-24-2017, 05:53 AM #1891
Also, always mount your stuff on the line for ON3P
-
09-24-2017, 09:07 AM #1892
https://shop.on3pskis.com/products/t...re_looking_for
Okay, that's pretty hilarious.
-
09-24-2017, 09:08 AM #1893Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- idaho panhandle!
- Posts
- 9,981
HAH!
-
09-24-2017, 07:18 PM #1894
You'd think for that much they could do a better top deck.
watch out for snakes
-
09-25-2017, 08:03 AM #1895
-
09-25-2017, 08:11 AM #1896
Ugly,
Some others have said it, but the Wren 98 is a great choice for what you are describing.
With that said, the Kartels are absolutely not just for park (especially the Kartel 108/116). We have many customers and employees that ski the K108 as a daily driver and with the slightly lower tail than previous versions it rails groomers and skis exceptionally well going forward.
The mounting position isn't centered, but it's farther forward than Wrenegades, absolutely (Kartel 108 @ -4.5cm in 186 from core center).
As for them skiing the same between the Kartels and wrens I would tend to disagree, but everyone has their own style and stance (or extra stiff Kartels/Jeffries)
All that spewed, the Wren 98 is your perfect ski for what you described and we made it just for your requests.You should have been here yesterday!
-
09-25-2017, 10:10 AM #1897Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Sun Valley, ID
- Posts
- 2,546
-
09-25-2017, 10:57 AM #1898
-
09-25-2017, 02:40 PM #1899Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2017
- Location
- PDX
- Posts
- 79
Like you I’m a traditional skier, and well into middle-age. Unlike you I am 5'7" 145lb. Last season and I spent quite a few days demoing ON3P skis, so maybe this will help.
As far as your concern that the Wren 98 has a "tail that doesn't want to release". The one thing that really surprised me about the Wren 98 was how easy it was to smear and slarve. I expected the tail to be quite a bit more "locked in". This ski probably has more tip rocker than any other ski in its class.....and also has a decent amount of tail rocker. I skied them on a day with 8 inches of new and it was all the powder ski I needed. I’ve got a 88, 108 (Wren) and 116 (BG) so no need for a 98 in my quiver. But deciding between the 98 and the 108 for my middle ski was tough. Also the 174 was recommended for my height/weight, but I felt they skied short and definitely preferred the 179.
-
09-25-2017, 04:05 PM #1900Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- SW CO
- Posts
- 5,597
To be fair, I was comparing stock versions based on a LL demo day in subpar conditions. I might be a slight exaggeration to say they ski the same, but my point was I found the mount point to be the most noticeable difference, not the flex or the way the tail released, etc. I should also clarify that my impressions were limited to 2D snow.
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
Bookmarks