Page 360 of 599 FirstFirst ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 ... LastLast
Results 8,976 to 9,000 of 14972
  1. #8976
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Where full grown men pretend to be cowboys
    Posts
    564
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    longtime bg fan, checking in with building excitement for the bg & woodsman pairing for soft snow dominaaaationnnn
    Did this for the last two seasons: Stock WD108/stock BG inbounds, and Steeple116 (old layup) for touring.

    The only box this quiver didn't crush for me was extreme freeze/thaw conditions in the BC, so I pivoted there.

    I put the WD108 Tour through its paces in the Beartooths this summer, and my brutally biased opinion is that they ski well above their weight class in refrozen bullshit. I had my stock WD 108s with me for skiing the lifts on, but never even thought about grabbing them.

    Gimme a shout if you make it back to your motherland this season. Snowed up there a little bit yesterday!

  2. #8977
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    Right on Al. I'll get ahold of you if I get a chance to ski out there this year. Shit is pretty uncertain. Can't quite remember if we ended up skiing when you had the demos at Alpy... I recall partying in the camper, though.

    Already got light carbonated blades for long/spring/firm, and a few others for flavor, but the ON3P side of the stable will be:

    189 BG 108 T - midwinter tour
    192 WD 108 - daily
    191 BG - lift pow
    186 Tychoon - dadski/firm/dickaround

    Ah, the turn is here and I'm stoked.

  3. #8978
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    Another shot of the tour core I think. With milled out region @ binding? Retention plate or heavy weave?

    Name:  Screenshot_20200904-060851_Instagram.jpeg
Views: 1239
Size:  40.7 KB

  4. #8979
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Right on Al. I'll get ahold of you if I get a chance to ski out there this year. Shit is pretty uncertain. Can't quite remember if we ended up skiing when you had the demos at Alpy... I recall partying in the camper, though.

    Already got light carbonated blades for long/spring/firm, and a few others for flavor, but the ON3P side of the stable will be:

    189 BG 108 T - midwinter tour
    192 WD 108 - daily
    191 BG - lift pow
    186 Tychoon - dadski/firm/dickaround

    Ah, the turn is here and I'm stoked.
    Norseman is a man of culture and sophistication

    I'll have:

    182 Wood 108 - everyday inbounds
    186 Wren 112 - running over texans
    186 BG 116 - inbounds pow
    184 BG 116 Tour - everyday touring

    Also have narrower and wider touring skis but I'll probably be on one of the ON3Ps most days

  5. #8980
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,255
    looking at 182 woodsman 108 vs 181 jeffrey 108 for my 15yo
    woodsman is more directional w/ longer turn radius; jeffrey described as "do-it-all west coast ski" on the website -- that's kind of what i'm looking for here
    thinking jeffrey also might be more forgiving cuz while he's grown a lot, he's not fully adult sized yet [height yes, weight no]
    he isn't a park kid but likes a more centered stance
    he skis a lot of heavy snow & some actual pow every now/then
    he has skied the woodsman briefly

    what would sway the thinking one way or the other?

  6. #8981
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Driving2VT
    Posts
    4,599
    I don’t think you can go wrong. More casual centered stance vs. driving the tips of the ski fall-line focused directional style. Skier presence. Guessing the mount point of the Jeffery a bit more forgiving so slower out of the start gate but will charge hard when driven.
    Uno mas

  7. #8982
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    94
    Looks like there's a weight for the 187 Woodsman 108 tour listed on the site:

    https://shop.on3pskis.com/products/woodsman-108-tour

    1.79 kg = 3.946 lbs/ski

    Pretty happy with that weight!

    Apologies if I'm jongin and this has already been posted previously

  8. #8983
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Where full grown men pretend to be cowboys
    Posts
    564
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    looking at 182 woodsman 108 vs 181 jeffrey 108 for my 15yo
    woodsman is more directional w/ longer turn radius; jeffrey described as "do-it-all west coast ski" on the website -- that's kind of what i'm looking for here
    thinking jeffrey also might be more forgiving cuz while he's grown a lot, he's not fully adult sized yet [height yes, weight no]
    he isn't a park kid but likes a more centered stance
    he skis a lot of heavy snow & some actual pow every now/then
    he has skied the woodsman briefly

    what would sway the thinking one way or the other?
    What were his thoughts on the Woodsman? The mount point on the 20/21 Woodsman 108 will be *slightly* further back. (-.75cm from 19/20 in 182 length).

    Jeffrey would be my suggestion based on your initial post, but I'm still curious to hear what he thought.

  9. #8984
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,255

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    He grunted something that sounded like enthusiasm, but made words that sounded like cautiously disdainful acceptance...
    “They were ok - I wish they were more centered.”

    I know he doesn’t really spend a lot of time going switch so isn’t in dire need of a proper twin, but he likes them insofar as they qualify as cool.

    If you ask him his favorite skiing type, he’ll say freeride.

    Anyone speak teen here?

    Prolly the thing to do is get him on a Jeffrey demo if the factory has one early this season

  10. #8985
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,409
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    He grunted something that sounded like enthusiasm, but made words that sounded like cautiously disdainful acceptance...
    “They were ok - I wish they were more centered.”

    I know he doesn’t really spend a lot of time going switch so isn’t in dire need of a proper twin, but he likes them insofar as they qualify as cool.

    If you ask him his favorite skiing type, he’ll say freeride.

    Anyone speak teen here?

    Prolly the thing to do is get him on a Jeffrey demo if the factory has one early this season
    I'm later 20s so can still speak a little teen I think. My interpretation? Jeffery's.

    I was in a similar debate in looking for a "freeride" pow ski and was comparing the BG and the Jeffery 116 and after describing my skiing style on this thread, most everyone recommended the Jeffery. I hardly ever ski switch but always looking for things to pop off of and like a more centered ski.

    If he's describing his skiing as freeride and saying "I wish they were more centered" when referring to the Woodsman. That has Jeffery written all over it.

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  11. #8986
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,255
    Thx I appreciate that input

  12. #8987
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    "likes a more centered stance" = Jeffrey, especially with the Woodsman data point about being a bit too far back.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  13. #8988
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,255
    Thx, iggy
    Will you have a demo Jeffrey 108 in the fleet in pdx?

  14. #8989
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    Thx, iggy
    Will you have a demo Jeffrey 108 in the fleet in pdx?
    At this time, we have no plans to run a demo fleet out of factory (or any factory tours) while Covid remains a risk. Both Next and Timberline should have some demo skis - though not sure what models/sizes yet or their timeline.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  15. #8990
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    “They were ok - I wish they were more centered.”
    I would have already leaned slightly towards Jeffrey for him just based on the technique and skis most kids these days would have learned on, but this seals the deal.

  16. #8991
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Evergreen Co
    Posts
    982
    Trying to keep track of the well regarded older versions of Billy Goats. Is the 12/13 191cm version one of the sought after versions?

  17. #8992
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,255
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    At this time, we have no plans to run a demo fleet out of factory (or any factory tours) while Covid remains a risk. Both Next and Timberline should have some demo skis - though not sure what models/sizes yet or their timeline.
    Ah, understandable
    thx

    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    I would have already leaned slightly towards Jeffrey for him just based on the technique and skis most kids these days would have learned on, but this seals the deal.
    k, appreciate the comment, thx

  18. #8993
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailwind View Post
    Trying to keep track of the well regarded older versions of Billy Goats. Is the 12/13 191cm version one of the sought after versions?
    According to me, yes, for reasons however. Also Norseman skis it so that’s cool.

    Looking like:
    189 Billy Goats - skiing Reserved powder or chowder
    182 Woodsman 116 Tour - Unreserved powda
    186 Kartel 108s - many of the days I can get a Reservation
    182 Woodsman 96 - the other days I can get a reservation

  19. #8994
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,951
    Can we order the wren pro soon?

  20. #8995
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,305
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdeaner14 View Post
    Looks like there's a weight for the 187 Woodsman 108 tour listed on the site:

    1.79 kg = 3.946 lbs/ski

    Pretty happy with that weight!
    I am surprised that not more comments have been made since this nice little tidbit was posted yesterday but 1.79kg for 187 woods108tours is a mighty fine weight - good job Iggy&crew!

  21. #8996
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    824
    Yeah, if the jeffrey weights are in line with that, that's a winner.

  22. #8997
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    449
    Can we get a teaser shot of the Mera 102 graphic? I’ve been holding off on getting my wife new skis until she gets to see it.

  23. #8998
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    According to me, yes, for reasons however. Also Norseman skis it so that’s cool.
    you got a good reason i guess

    open invite to the bearclaw partay for the e-dweebos. XavierD will bring the beers

  24. #8999
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    also, BRAVO to iggy & the crew... those weights for the tour builds are fuckin money

  25. #9000
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    I am surprised that not more comments have been made since this nice little tidbit was posted yesterday but 1.79kg for 187 woods108tours is a mighty fine weight - good job Iggy&crew!
    Not too heavy, not too light.......but juusssssst right!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •