Page 104 of 599 FirstFirst ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... LastLast
Results 2,576 to 2,600 of 14972
  1. #2576
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    Speaking of, the wife and I are thinking of using our Mountain Collective Pass the week between Christmas and New Years at Squawlpine. Let's shred.
    I do have my three free Squawlpine days so I will very likely use one that week to mix it up. Also, with blackouts those places can be amazing and empty over holiday weeks. One of my best powder days ever went that way.
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

  2. #2577
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    1,496
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    Personally I think they ski great on the line (and I’m almost always more of a Wren type skier). If you are going to go back and prefer that style mount I would go -1cm from the line tops for your size.

    Let me know if you have any other questions
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    FWIW I liked the older Jeffreys about 2cm behind the line quite a bit better than the recommended point. The Kartel's I only skied on the line for a couple runs, but I would have considered mounting them back 1-2cm if I purchased as well. I am very definitely a Wren style skier though and strongly dislike centered mount points, so I'm probably a bit of anomaly. Powtron's recommendation of 0-1cm is probably good.

    I do feel like the skis with elliptical sidecut are more tolerant of moving the mount point since the sidecut is pretty straight underfoot. Anything bi-radius should stay within 1cm of recommended and anything RES should always go on the line.
    Thanks for the input fellas. I'm comfortable on both progressive and more traditionally mounted skis so I'm going to put them on the line.

  3. #2578
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    Quote Originally Posted by JaytaeMoney View Post
    Thanks for the input fellas. I'm comfortable on both progressive and more traditionally mounted skis so I'm going to put them on the line.
    Just to throw Chaos into the mix, Mine are at -2 and I love em there.

  4. #2579
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    1,496
    Did you start on the line and move back because you didn't like it or did you just go -2 right off the bat?

  5. #2580
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    Quote Originally Posted by JaytaeMoney View Post
    Did you start on the line and move back because you didn't like it or did you just go -2 right off the bat?
    I went minus 2 at the recommendation of ON3P at a demo event, liked it, and saw no reason to change.

  6. #2581
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    387
    On a pair of 186 K106s, I went -2 after experimenting at 0 and -1. I'm 6'2" 220-230, and I think I would have end up -1 on 191s.

  7. #2582
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,279
    What is this not mounting on the line business!? Shenanigans, I tell you!

  8. #2583
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    7,915
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    What is this not mounting on the line business!? Shenanigans, I tell you!

    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post

    I do feel like the skis with elliptical sidecut are more tolerant of moving the mount point since the sidecut is pretty straight underfoot. Anything bi-radius should stay within 1cm of recommended and anything RES should always go on the line.

    Seems like a solid summary.

  9. #2584
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    What is this not mounting on the line business!? Shenanigans, I tell you!
    In hindsight I really wish I had tried remounting my Jeffrey’s a bit behind the line since I am not a center mount skier. But Wrens and any RES ski needs to be on the line without a doubt.
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

  10. #2585
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    511
    Iggy or Powtron any info if the demo is happening at LL on 12/16?
    Thanks!

  11. #2586
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Portlandia
    Posts
    2,724
    Directional skier. Love the K108 on the line.
    Training for Alpental

  12. #2587
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,939
    I had an old set of wrens at +3 out of necessity. They skied great in my opinion. You guys are over thinking this

  13. #2588
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    Quote Originally Posted by ffmedic84 View Post
    Iggy or Powtron any info if the demo is happening at LL on 12/16?
    Thanks!
    Yep, just added it to the calendar. We will be there.
    You should have been here yesterday!

  14. #2589
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by PhiberAwptik View Post
    Directional skier. Love the K108 on the line.
    2nd - Wren(s) owner as well as Billygoat owner (193 Supergoats on the way)and thanks to Powtrons input and guidance I mounted my 191 116 Kartels on the line and F'ing love them...

  15. #2590
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    In hindsight I really wish I had tried remounting my Jeffrey’s a bit behind the line since I am not a center mount skier. But Wrens and any RES ski needs to be on the line without a doubt.
    Same here, I wish I tried my Jeffrey 114s -1.5cm behind the line, before I got rid of them.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #2591
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,939
    I've never understood the mindset that a ski that isn't doing it for you is going to metamorphosize when your change your boot center by 1.5 cm? it really shows a lack of ski sophistication on my part

  17. #2592
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    SG stoke

    You should have been here yesterday!

  18. #2593
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,939
    thois look sweet. Any chance you've seen a pair of 189 wren 108s with K116 topsheets roll through production?

  19. #2594
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729
    Quote Originally Posted by klauss View Post
    I've never understood the mindset that a ski that isn't doing it for you is going to metamorphosize when your change your boot center by 1.5 cm? it really shows a lack of ski sophistication on my part
    I don't think anyone is saying that. I really, really liked the Jeffrey's but in some cases felt like I was forced to lean back more than I wanted... especially since they were 181... so just that slight adjustment could have made a big difference. I liked them enough that I bought some BG's and then my ON3P addiction was solidified from there.

  20. #2595
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by klauss View Post
    I've never understood the mindset that a ski that isn't doing it for you is going to metamorphosize when your change your boot center by 1.5 cm? it really shows a lack of ski sophistication on my part
    It’s more when a ski is close for someone, but not quite there.. like the jeffrey 114s were for me.

    I find that sometimes it can make or brake a ski for me. I didn’t like katanas at +2cm, but on the line I love them. I want to go -1cm on my skinny Quixotes, I think that will make a difference.

    Sometimes on a center-ish mounted ski, going back -1.5 or 2cm can get rid of that “tail sensation”, and give you just a little more tip to allow for a bit more shin pressure and leaning-into. Just as long as they aren’t noodles, in which going back too far translates to tails washing out.




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #2596
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by klauss View Post
    I've never understood the mindset that a ski that isn't doing it for you is going to metamorphosize when your change your boot center by 1.5 cm? it really shows a lack of ski sophistication on my part
    It's not going to change a ski I hate into a ski I love, but I can absolutely feel a 1cm change in mount point and it can absolutely affect my experience on a ski.

    Some people just aren't sensitive to mount point though, nothing wrong with that. Personally I can't feel ramp angle in bindings at all, and some people on here report massive differences when they change their ramp angles by a few mm. Like all things, YMMV.

  22. #2597
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Sensitivity, shmensativity..

    The problem is our lack of sophistication


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #2598
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,939

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    On the contrary, your ability to sense differences in the mount point shows your astute awareness of the ski you're on.

    I definitely notice flex, running length and sidecut so not a complete heathen

  24. #2599
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    I’m very sensitive.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by Betelgeuse; 12-01-2017 at 01:45 AM.

  25. #2600
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    SG stoke

    More. MORE!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •