Page 67 of 599 FirstFirst ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,675 of 14972
  1. #1651
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729

    2016/2017 - ON3P SKIS Thread (Finally)

    This place is slipping. Magnets? How do they work???

    (A magnet strip rack is pretty clever tho!)
    I ski 135 degree chutes switch to the road.

  2. #1652
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by tenB View Post
    I ordered the same Wrens and they arrived last week. I demoed them at the end of the season and fell in love with them. 189 BGs arrived last week too and will round out my 2 ski quiver for next year.

    Anybody looking to pick up a pair of very good condition 2015 191 BGs should pm me for details. I might regret selling them.. any now they are SOLD, that was fast
    Were those my old BGs??? Damn I wish I saw this, I would have bought them back..

    Anyways, how did they work out?

    And, how did the C&Ds workout?

  3. #1653
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,841
    I still want Billygoats in a 189 or 191, stiff layup.

  4. #1654
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Leavenworth Skier View Post
    I still want Billygoats in a 189 or 191, stiff layup.
    Can you not build a 189cm through the custom program?
    (I see that only 184 is listed, but I bet if you asked .....)

  5. #1655
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NCW
    Posts
    4,610
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    Can you not build a 189cm through the custom program?
    (I see that only 184 is listed, but I bet if you asked .....)
    I mean, he could, but LS won't even spend $900 on a car.

  6. #1656
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,841
    Quote Originally Posted by kai_ski View Post
    I mean, he could, but LS won't even spend $900 on a car.
    Quoted for truth

  7. #1657
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    Hey,

    Anyone got a straight pull measurement for a 184 Billy Goat? My ideal ski length is about 187 so could realistically go either 184 or 189. Also, anyone got a rocker shot?

    Cheers

  8. #1658
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,742
    straight pull on my '15/'16 184cm BGs is .... 184!
    rocker pics ...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170828_125329.jpg 
Views:	126 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	211169
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170828_125339.jpg 
Views:	123 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	211170

    I skied the new asym 189s and ordered them in 184. They were manageable, but I'm better off on the 184, no doubt.

  9. #1659
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by rob stokes View Post
    Hey,

    Anyone got a straight pull measurement for a 184 Billy Goat? My ideal ski length is about 187 so could realistically go either 184 or 189. Also, anyone got a rocker shot?

    Cheers
    Straight pull on a 184 BG is 184. Like all of their skis.

    The 184 is just the old 186 with 2cm of the twin lopped off. So it skis a bit longer than you'd think.

  10. #1660
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    Nice, cheers. If I pull the trigger I'll go shorter I think. A true 189 is pretty big.

  11. #1661
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,987
    Quote Originally Posted by rob stokes View Post
    Nice, cheers. If I pull the trigger I'll go shorter I think. A true 189 is pretty big.
    Are you pretty small? If so then the 184 is probably money for you.

  12. #1662
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    I'm short, but stocky. Probably 5'9" and 180 nekkid. Favorite pow skis are 190lotus 120 (187 straight pull) and current everyday ski is 186 supernatural 108 which is about 184cm straight pull.

    Could go both ways really. Looking for a ski thats a versitile pow ski, more versitile than the 120's. Have some hoji 187 and love how they turn quick in the trees but are still stable in the alpine and ski whistler mank well, but can't get on with the centred mount point. I basically want to replace the hoji with something with the attributes of that ski that I like, without the forward mount.

  13. #1663
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,600
    ^^After reading that, my concern would be that you'd find the BG too similar to the 190 L120. But I haven't skied the newer iterations of the BG, so I can't speak to its improved versatility.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  14. #1664
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,321
    Hoping some folks can chime in regarding Wren 108 sizing 184 vs 189. I'm 6 ft 185 lbs. Raced in college, know how to drive the tips. Normally on the 190 Bibbys and 186 Belafontes, love the way they ski and their stability through chop/crud. Basically looking for something more on the daily driver part of the spectrum than the Bibbys, and something with more tip rocker than Belfontes that can be more soft snow specific. Seems like the Wren 108s are a great fit, however blister weighed the 184s at 2125 grams which I'm worried will be a bit too light and might not handle chop/crud as well for my build. Based on that and the feedback that these arent a super demanding ski, it seems like a logical decision to size up to 189s. Thoughts?

  15. #1665
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler, BC
    Posts
    1,496
    That's good news, I loved my 120's and have never found something I clicked with since. Always wished they had a bit tighter radius so they are more versitile on the hard stuff. A bit of tail rocker would be nice too.

    Hopefully the BG is a bit of a blend between the 120's stability and the hoji quickness. That would be amazing!

  16. #1666
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,600
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Hoping some folks can chime in regarding Wren 108 sizing 184 vs 189. I'm 6 ft 185 lbs. Raced in college, know how to drive the tips. Normally on the 190 Bibbys and 186 Belafontes, love the way they ski and their stability through chop/crud. Basically looking for something more on the daily driver part of the spectrum than the Bibbys, and something with more tip rocker than Belfontes that can be more soft snow specific. Seems like the Wren 108s are a great fit, however blister weighed the 184s at 2125 grams which I'm worried will be a bit too light and might not handle chop/crud as well for my build. Based on that and the feedback that these arent a super demanding ski, it seems like a logical decision to size up to 189s. Thoughts?
    I skied half a day on the 190 Bibby, and it skis very short, IME. If you sometimes wished it was longer, go 189. If you never want more tip/ski, go 184. If you like the progressive mount of the Bibby and just want something like a narrower Bibby, the 186 Kartel 108 might be right up your alley, and splits the difference in length a bit.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  17. #1667
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,600
    Quote Originally Posted by rob stokes View Post
    Hopefully the BG is a bit of a blend between the 120's stability and the hoji quickness. That would be amazing!
    Then go 184.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  18. #1668
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,321
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    I skied half a day on the 190 Bibby, and it skis very short, IME. If you sometimes wished it was longer, go 189. If you never want more tip/ski, go 184. If you like the progressive mount of the Bibby and just want something like a narrower Bibby, the 186 Kartel 108 might be right up your alley, and splits the difference in length a bit.
    Thanks. Never really thought about the Kartel. Interesting, but for a daily driver I'd prefer the more solid tail and rear oriented mount point of the Wrenegade.

  19. #1669
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    da hood
    Posts
    1,120
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Hoping some folks can chime in regarding Wren 108 sizing 184 vs 189. I'm 6 ft 185 lbs. Raced in college, know how to drive the tips. Normally on the 190 Bibbys and 186 Belafontes, love the way they ski and their stability through chop/crud. Basically looking for something more on the daily driver part of the spectrum than the Bibbys, and something with more tip rocker than Belfontes that can be more soft snow specific. Seems like the Wren 108s are a great fit, however blister weighed the 184s at 2125 grams which I'm worried will be a bit too light and might not handle chop/crud as well for my build. Based on that and the feedback that these arent a super demanding ski, it seems like a logical decision to size up to 189s. Thoughts?
    The 189 wren 108 may be lighter but it skis like a nimble heavyweight, especially in junky snow. I demoed them for one day and immediately put an order in to replace my worn out 192 Cochise. They are almost exactly the same dimensions, including length. At your size you could probably get away with the 184, but if you're worried about stability in crud, go 189.

  20. #1670
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,321
    Also sounds like the Wren tail rocker and profile allow the tails to release easily, which makes me believe they would ski a tad shorter than comparable lengths.

  21. #1671
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,600
    Yeah, at your size I personally think the 189 is a no-brainer, but I also think the 190 Bibby skis pretty short. FWIW, the tail on the Kartel is pretty solid. It's similar to a narrower (but better) Bibby Pro. The 186 Kartel feels similar in length to the 190 Bibby (and I would guess they measure within a cm of each other).

    Have you wished the Bibby was longer? Have you ever felt like it was too long?
    Last edited by auvgeek; 08-29-2017 at 09:17 AM.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  22. #1672
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,309
    Quote Originally Posted by rob stokes View Post
    That's good news, I loved my 120's and have never found something I clicked with since. Always wished they had a bit tighter radius so they are more versitile on the hard stuff. A bit of tail rocker would be nice too.

    Hopefully the BG is a bit of a blend between the 120's stability and the hoji quickness. That would be amazing!
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    Then go 184.
    X2, the 190 L120 and 184 BG have similar stability IME. The BG is more playful and pivots easier, and definitely skis better on hard snow. I think the BG likes a touch more upright stance than the L120. Both great skis and if you liked the L120 I think you'll like the BG a lot. The 189 BG feels like a longer ski than the 190 L120.

    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Thanks. Never really thought about the Kartel. Interesting, but for a daily driver I'd prefer the more solid tail and rear oriented mount point of the Wrenegade.
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    Yeah, at your size I personally think the 189 is a no-brainer, but I also think the 190 Bibby skis pretty short. FWIW, the tail on the Kartel is pretty solid. It's similar to a narrower (but better) Bibby Pro. The 186 Kartel feels similar in length to the 190 Bibby (and I would guess they measure within a cm of each other).

    Have you wished the Bibby was longer? Have you ever felt like it was too long?
    I would agree that the Kartel kinda skis like a narrow Bibby. The Wren 108 is definitely more of a Belafonte replacement. I would say if you thought the 187 Bela was the right size, the 184 Wren will be the right size. A 192 Bela fan would want a 189 Wren.
    I own the older version of the Bela (before the fucked up camber) and would say the Wren 108 offers similar stability, is a bit more damp, a bit easier to pivot the tail, but lacks a bit of power/rebound in the tail (due to the rocker).

  23. #1673
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,321
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    Yeah, at your size I personally think the 189 is a no-brainer, but I also think the 190 Bibby skis pretty short. FWIW, the tail on the Kartel is pretty solid. It's similar to a narrower (but better) Bibby Pro. The 186 Kartel feels similar in length to the 190 Bibby (and I would guess they measure within a cm of each other).

    Have you wished the Bibby was longer? Have you ever felt like it was too long?
    Never felt like the 190 Bibby was too long. I can maneuver them easily through steep moguled chutes. The Wren 189s might be a touch longer, but considering the Wren is lighter and narrower, I figured the 189 would suit me well too.

  24. #1674
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,321
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    X2, the 190 L120 and 184 BG have similar stability IME. The BG is more playful and pivots easier, and definitely skis better on hard snow. I think the BG likes a touch more upright stance than the L120. Both great skis and if you liked the L120 I think you'll like the BG a lot. The 189 BG feels like a longer ski than the 190 L120.





    I would agree that the Kartel kinda skis like a narrow Bibby. The Wren 108 is definitely more of a Belafonte replacement. I would say if you thought the 187 Bela was the right size, the 184 Wren will be the right size. A 192 Bela fan would want a 189 Wren.
    I own the older version of the Bela (before the fucked up camber) and would say the Wren 108 offers similar stability, is a bit more damp, a bit easier to pivot the tail, but lacks a bit of power/rebound in the tail (due to the rocker).
    Good point on the Wren/Belfonte comparison. However the Belafontes have a longer effective edge in the similar length. 186 Belafonte: 156cm, 192 Belafonte: 164cm.... 184 Wren: 153cm, 189 Wren 158cm.

  25. #1675
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    2016/2017 - ON3P SKIS Thread (Finally)

    I agree it skis pretty short, but I found the 190 Bibby needed more input than the 191 Billy Goats. I just find the BG so easy to ski, without the traditional sidecut up front.

    Both sizes would work for Rob Stokes, depends on the terrain/mountain you ski at.

    I cant wait to get on my goats this year(2017 189 regular, 2014 191 tours), after regrettably selling my 2015 191s. It's like all new twists to my favorite flavor of ice cream.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •